|
is a "keep your powder dry" mindset.
The family got together and persuaded him to run. The family got together and agreed to drop out.
He has said he made a personal decision to stick to doing the best he could in the Senate after the previous try. They persuaded him to put himself out there and jump into that toxic arena again; he did, and the results were discouraging, to say the least. From what little interaction I had with them (Jim, Hunter) it was clear they were 1000% on board with the effort, proud as peacocks. I am certain that if he had said he wanted to hang in there they'd have been for it.
Iowa is not necessarily a good predictor of future success, but the fact is that it is very highly weighted toward his style of campaign - the barnstorming, close up and personal stuff - and it did not succeed. Granted, the caucus process obscures whatever first-round support a non-viable candidate had, so he well may have garnered over 10% initially, for all we know. May have been stronger than Richardson, but just distributed such that his support evaporated differently, leaving Richardson slightly more puddles. With the luck of a coin toss, their results might have been reversed and he might have been the fourth one in last nights debates. Had that occurred, he'd have cleaned the floor with the others, particularly on the Pakistan portion. It was a venue where he'd have gotten equal time for a change.
For want of a nail...
I expect he and the family are acutely aware of this and as frustrated by it as we. But it is what it is. If he had not withdrawn, he still would not have been there. He'd be lumped with Gravel and Kucinich by the general public as the "idiot fringe" or whatever most of the sheeple think of the non-American-Idol candidates.
I want a competent president. I was a Gore supporter well before Clinton got the nod, and was hoping against hope he'd enter the race. I still wish Joe or he would somehow get anointed - preferably Joe.
Damn, it is sad to watch America being consumed by the Oligarchs before our very eyes. Of those left standing, there is only one who at least acknowledges that is a problem. I don't know whether it is opportunism, as many here seem to think, or real commitment. I do know that the others talk far too much about accommodating the enemy (the oligarchs) and the MSM is striving mightily to get one of them anointed.
I truly believe now that the best hope for the country is to work like hell to get Edwards the nod (yes, hold your noses if you have to), and cross our fingers that Joe and Al would both have big roles to play in the administration (or in Joe's case, as SFRC Chair, if he prefers).
The steamroller is just about finished with the coup. This is the last election with any hope whatsoever of stopping it. Obama is not that hope. Clinton clearly is not. Continuing to devote energy to getting Joe (or Al) into the WH is about as useful as fighting for Kucinich or Gravel, IMO.
I guess I'm humming that song "Know When to Hold 'Em" and I am not the least bit happy about it.
Maybe, just maybe, the planets will align and there will be a deadlocked convention. Or who knows what? Who would have thought when Nixon/Agnew were elected that before 8 years was up Ford would be President?
jeez, this is frustrating.
|