|
the Bushwhack Financial 9/11, due to good leftist policy and good government--and, critically important, due to their rejection of U.S./corporate "neoliberal" and World Bank/IMF policy and advice. Argentina climbed out of total ruination by the World Bank/IMF, reversed course, got help from Venezuela, paid off its debt, and has been well on the road to recovery over the last decade. Venezuela has done the opposite of U.S. policy in every way--it has acquired control of its major resource, oil, and a 60/40 split of the oil profits, and has been using the money to quickly bootstrap the poor, boost small business, initiate land reform (for food security), and create infrastructure and local manufacturing, while saving $42 billion in international cash reserves against a "rainy day." That money would otherwise be in Exxon Mobil's bloated coffers, doing no one any good. It gives Venezuela a good cushion against Bushwhack "shock and awe" economics. Brazil--headed by a center-left president, and close ally of the leftists in Venezuela and other countries--has also done well, by spending money on the poor, and on regional development projects (to help the poorest countries, such as Bolivia and Paraguay), and by rejecting the cruelty and looting of U.S./European economic advisers. Bolivia, under leftist Evo Morales, has doubled its gas revenues to $2 billion per year, and has thus been able to provide a pension for the poorest elderly and to initiate educational, medical, resource development and land reform projects, and has also weathered a full on Bushwhack fascist coup attempt.
I'm glad to hear that Chile has also be blessed with good government. Batchelet has been an increasingly strong ally of Chavez as well--something I only recently learned. Apparently, she told Condi Rice to stop demonizing Chavez. I was guided by a previous action of Batchelet--back in 2006, she seemed to cave to U.S./Bushwhack pressure on Venezuela taking its rightful turn on the UN Security Council. Chile didn't vote against it; they abstained, but the effect was the same, to deny Venezuela its seat. But things have changed. Batchelet was a key player in fending off the U.S./Bushwhack fascist coup plot in Bolivia, and I don't know when she talked to Condi about Chavez, but it seems that Batchelet has sought more and more solidarity with Bushwhack targets--the strongest leftists and best governments in South America. Why this is important in an economic discussion is that Venezuela is the leader in declaring its sovereign independence from U.S. dictation, and U.S. dictation always has to do with enriching the rich, and further impoverishing the poor, always at the expense of good policy, and to the detriment of most South Americans. What this means is that Batchelet, who was already a socialist--but a more "centrist" one--is moving more to the left, and this is paying off as to Chile's economy.
Help the poor, and the country will prosper. Help the rich, and watch your country die.
|