Just to mention several outstanding examples of disinformation in this article:
"Elsewhere in the region, many of the leaders have already solidified their hold on power, in part through referendums and new constitutions overwhelmingly approved by voters. In Venezuela, other branches of government including congress and the judiciary are stacked with Chavez allies, leaving his opponents with few options for getting back into power."First, the "stacked" Congress. What this article doesn't point out--and should--is that Venezuela's National Assembly members are ALSO ELECTED, and that Venezuelan voters have overwhelmingly approved a pro-Chavez National Assembly (congress), in elections that are far, FAR more transparent than our own.
The Associated Pukes are implying that Chavez "stacked Congress"--hand-selected the members of the National Assembly. They are objecting not to a "strongman," but to democracy! They rightfully acknowledge that Chavez and most of his government's initiatives have overwhelming approval among Venezuelans, but then they just ride their horse right over that reality, and
still feed this lie that he is a "dictator."
The use of the word "solidified" ("solidified their hold on power") also colors the FACT of popular, DEMOCRATIC support with the smear of "tyranny"--as if the democratic institutions and honest elections in these countries mean nothing. They're saying, 'oh, yeah, well, the ignorant poor voted for them--but what do they matter?' They just hate it that the "ignorant poor" can elect leaders who attend to their interests, in these DEMOCRATIC countries, and smugly consider our own 'model democracy,' where the poor cannot do so, to be superior.
The article also promotes uncontradicted LIES by rightwing politicians, for instance, Venezuelan opposition leader Jose Luis Farias saying that "Chavez has violated the constitution a lot more than Zelaya did."
Chavez and his government have not only scrupulously adhered to the Venezuelan Constitution, when the "opposition" in Venezuela attempted their coup, in 2002, what did they do? They SUSPENDED THE CONSTITUTION, the National Assembly, the courts and all civil rights!
WHO has contempt for the rule of law? To ignore this egregious hypocrisy is to support it. The Associated Pukes support it, as they have proven time and time and time again.
I urge readers to beware of everything in this article; to be particularly wary of all AP articles on Latin America, and to be generally wary of our corpo/fascist press as a whole, on this subject. The NYT is as a bad as AP. There is NO trustworthy news source on Latin America anywhere in our corpo/fascist 'news' monopoly landscape.
Some antidotes:
www.venezuelanalysis.com
www.narconews.com
www.BoRev.net (accurate, and funny)
http://www.incakolanews.blogspot.com/ (mostly economic angle)
In fact, BoRev has comment on this very AP article today.
http://www.borev.net/2009/08/ap_on_the_fence_about_new_era.html