Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Curbs Secrecy of Classified Documents (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 10:18 PM
Original message
Obama Curbs Secrecy of Classified Documents (NYT)
Obama Curbs Secrecy of Classified Documents
By CHARLIE SAVAGE

WASHINGTON — President Obama declared on Tuesday that “no information may remain classified indefinitely” as part of a sweeping overhaul of the executive branch’s system for protecting classified national security information.

In an executive order and an accompanying presidential memorandum to agency heads, Mr. Obama signaled that the government should try harder to make information public if possible, including by requiring agencies to regularly review what kinds of information they classify and to eliminate any obsolete secrecy requirements.

“Agency heads shall complete on a periodic basis a comprehensive review of the agency’s classification guidance, particularly classification guides, to ensure the guidance reflects current circumstances and to identify classified information that no longer requires protection and can be declassified,” Mr. Obama wrote in the order, released while he was vacationing in Hawaii.

He also established a new National Declassification Center at the National Archives to speed the process of declassifying historical documents by centralizing their review, rather than sending them in sequence to different agencies. He set a four-year deadline for processing a 400-million-page backlog of such records that includes archives related to military operations during World War II and the Korean and Vietnam Wars.

Moreover, Mr. Obama eliminated a rule put in place by former President George W. Bush in 2003 that allowed the leader of the intelligence community to veto decisions by an interagency panel to declassify information. Instead, spy agencies who object to such a decision will have to appeal to the president.

<SNIP>

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/30/us/politics/30secrets.html?src=twt&twt=nytimespolitics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. I distinctly recall Obama promising more transparency in government, - didn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. He is JUST LIKE BUSH!
Oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. yah! - I'll wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. But this doesn't count as an "accomplishment" because
it's not finished, yet. Right? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No-it doesn't count because
ANY Dem. would do this (according to a poster yesterday).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I say they don't count..bc they're
not out doing the work..only snipping on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I agree!
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another one for the Prez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm mixed on this.
Some of the WWII secrets are still in use *today*, albeit in much more modern forms.

Good on him for making progress, but do we really need to make our, oh, nuclear weapons technology secrets, freely available?

When should we declassify (if not indefinitely) our nuclear weapons documents?

After every nation, and extra-national group, has also figured it out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I gotta think there is an asterisk
I don't think we're giving out nuke secrets anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Where does the asterisk stop?
This has always been the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC