Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nancy Pelosi takes swipe at President Obama's campaign promises

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:24 AM
Original message
Nancy Pelosi takes swipe at President Obama's campaign promises
Pelosi swipes at Obama's promises
By: Patrick O'Connor and Glenn Thrush
January 5, 2010

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, piqued with White House pressure to accept the Senate health reform bill, threw a rare rhetorical elbow Tuesday at President Barack Obama, questioning his commitment to his 2008 campaign promises.

A leadership aide said it was no accident.

Pelosi emerged from a meeting with her leadership team and committee chairs in the Capitol to face an aggressive throng of reporters who immediately hit her with C-SPAN’s request that she permit closed-door final talks on the bill to be televised.

A reporter reminded the San Francisco Democrat that in 2008, then-candidate Obama opined that all such negotiations be open to C-SPAN cameras.

“There are a number of things he was for on the campaign trail,” quipped Pelosi, who has no intention of making the deliberations public.

People familiar with Pelosi's thinking wasted little time in explaining precisely what she meant by a “number of things” — saying it reflected weeks of simmering tension on health care between two Democratic power players who have functioned largely in lock step during Obama’s first year in office.


Senior House Democratic leadership aides say Pelosi was pointedly referring to Obama’s ’08 pledge not to raise taxes on the middle class, which she interprets to include a tax on so-called Cadillac health care plans that offer lavish benefit packages to many union members.

The House aides, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Pelosi has been miffed with Obama’s tilt toward the Senate plan and his expectation that the House would simply go along with the Senate bill out of political necessity.

A Pelosi aide later downplayed the remark, saying, "It was a quip, not a jab at anyone."

“She’s setting up for the conference,” said a leadership staffer. “It’s strategic. She’s staking out her territory.”

It wasn't the first time she's done so.

Pelosi has repeatedly expressed her frustrations about the inclusion of the Cadillac tax in the Senate bill and has sparred with Obama about the issue during face-to-face meetings. Her hope now, House aides say, is to get the administration to accept a tax that starts on family plans worth $28,000 — $7,000 more than the threshold favored by Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

The White House has shown a clear preference for the Senate product in the months-long, bifurcated health care debate. And Reid holds the two best trump cards in the form of Sens. Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman, two wavering moderates who have already threatened to vote against a final compromise if it deviates significantly from legislation the Senate passed late last year.

That means the speaker needs to play her cards wisely — even if it means directing some well-timed fire at the president.

All year, liberal Democrats have been clamoring for Obama to get more involved in the health care negotiations, hoping he would weigh in to push their top priority — the public option. The president is now promising to take a much more active role in these final negotiations — his staff will convene a meeting with House and Senate aides as early as Wednesday to start laying the groundwork for the talks. But that might not be a good thing for the speaker or her liberal colleagues because of the White House preference for the Senate bill.

Continue Reading: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31180.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't sound like a swipe, to me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Pelosi doesn't like the middle class tax increase on health care plans.
Finally someone cares about keeping Obama's campaign promises. Too bad it's not him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It is just reality. Congress does have a say even though people want to ignore that fact. Obama is
not a dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I do not trust this report, and I did not interpret her comments as being a "swipe."
I think this is an overplayed moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. it's politico.
The comment that spurred the quote tells all.

A reporter reminded the San Francisco Democrat that in 2008, then-candidate Obama opined that all such negotiations be open to C-SPAN cameras.

“There are a number of things he was for on the campaign trail,” quipped Pelosi, who has no intention of making the deliberations public.

The comment is her way of saying his campaign wishes mean nothing to her because it's up to her and Reid to decide if they should make it public. Congress is not beholden to the things he was "for" on the campaign trail. She has her own mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tpm reporting pelosi is steamed over white house pressure to swallow the senate bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Well, we could go with the House Bill which has no chance of passing the Senate. Sometimes reality
sucks but it is what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. She wants modifications to the Cadillac tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I would think they could raise the $$$ when the tax starts but they want to keep it because it is
one of the ways to try to slow the increase in health care spending. I would bet they up the $$$ when it hits but leave it in.

Hopefully it makes it so unions can bargain for higher wages instead of so much focus on HC benefits.

We'll see - as usual, the main problem is what you can get Lieberman and Nelson to vote for. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. If only they would give something on tort reform.
That would have been huge. I know it's out of the blue and unlikely but one can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. she is the only one that can truly make it happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. i much prefer the house's tax on millionaires to the "cadillac" tax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Politico in full spin mode.
Gotta love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones..
A pretty hypocritcal swipe coming from someone who staunchly supported public option, until yesterday when she announced that it isn't not so much a "public option" that she supports but "the public's option" for lower costs. Uh huh.

That sounds you just renegged on your public option support, Nance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. it's easier to blame someone else i suppose. don't see how you can blame the pres for what the house
and senate put in their own bills...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Exactly. And I don't blame Pelosi for backing off the public option
if she knows they can't get the votes for it in the Senate -- that's politics and the art of compromise. But she of all people should realize that sometimes you have to adjust your positions in order to get something passed, instead of blaming Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC