|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 12:46 AM Original message |
You know who I could crucify right now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Ok, let me add, why did we bother reaching out to Snow-who obviously was put there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BR_Parkway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 07:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. We needed her blessing on the compromises they'd already made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 07:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Didn't they need Snowe to get it out of the committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 08:34 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. No - there were 13 Democrats to 11 Republicans, the significance was "it was bipartisan" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 08:44 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Who made that decision? Rahm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:14 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I think it was Baucus, who was very set on writing a genuinely bipartisan bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. I remember reading that someone turned Down Snowes public option trigger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 02:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I think it was because that was less likely to get the votes than the state opt out plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
2. You have Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 02:11 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Uh yeah. I'd be more angry at Max Baucus too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 05:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Actually, from that angle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
3. A bit more to it than that, but you're on the right track |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
4. Ok, I nominate you to plan the next party convention. The mass crucifixion of the blue dogs will... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. I'm not into torture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 02:23 AM Response to Original message |
7. Oh please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 03:36 AM Response to Original message |
8. And the DLC, the fools who are afraid of progressivism. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 08:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFLforever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 04:20 AM Response to Original message |
9. If Coakley loses Tues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 07:11 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I'm already there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 08:24 AM Response to Original message |
15. And not Mitch McConnel, Olympia Snowe and Chuck Grassley? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:19 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. +1 for Clio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Yeah, but those assholes are supposed to be opposed to us. They're Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. They take an oath to defend the Constitution.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
19. Jesus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadesofgray (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
21. Obama enabled both of them, though. They're all in it together. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. This crap is really getting ridiculous. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iceman66 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
22. Blame the entire party leadership for letting the health care debate drag on so long. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueMTexpat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-18-10 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
23. In all fairness to Max (and I admit that I am totally disgusted with his HC actions), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC