Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You know who I could crucify right now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 12:46 AM
Original message
You know who I could crucify right now?
Max fucking Baucus, who single-handedly delayed the bill for months while he endlessly negotiated with Chuck Grassley.

Had it not been for him, this would have been done in September.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ok, let me add, why did we bother reaching out to Snow-who obviously was put there
by the repubs to stall the entire thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. We needed her blessing on the compromises they'd already made
with the lobbyists - as long as they could claim 'bipartisanship', then they had a ready made excuse for not producing a more progressive bill.

Then when Snowe didn't play along, they were stuck there exposed as the lobbyist suck up pigs that they are as well, without benefit of being able to blame the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Didn't they need Snowe to get it out of the committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. No - there were 13 Democrats to 11 Republicans, the significance was "it was bipartisan"
Though one Republican giving a lukewarm (if that) yes, hardly makes it a real bi-partisan bill. He had all the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Who made that decision? Rahm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think it was Baucus, who was very set on writing a genuinely bipartisan bill
The fact is that the overall structure Baucus constructed IS very close to what was bale to get 60 votes in the Senate. I think it was an effort to produce a bill that most people could tolerate. I think he was very slow to give up that dream, but unlike Reid, he has yet to say that he wishes he would not have done that. A second thing I would fault him for was changing the thresholds on the Cadillac Plan from the $25,000 which the unions had grudging agreed not to fight.

I think Reid could have pushed Baucus to take less time and he could have not tried to work with Snowe as much as he did - but in both cases, I think it was a matter of degree. They did demonstrate good faith in trying to work with the Republicans, but they could have cut it off faster. I think the Democrats would have been so much better had everything been pushed up at least a month. (Especially as there is almost a month lost with the recess.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. I remember reading that someone turned Down Snowes public option trigger
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 01:27 PM by dkf
For a strategic reason. Who was that? Reid? And what were they hoping for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I think it was because that was less likely to get the votes than the state opt out plan
(that Dean liked better) had a better chance of being accepted. I also think that the public option was not the only thing stopping Snowe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. You have Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh out there
and you pick Max Baucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Uh yeah. I'd be more angry at Max Baucus too.
Robertson and Limbaugh are irrelevant. Baucus was in the position as a gatekeeper to either allow or discourage substantive change in health care.

His crimes are far greater than the idiocy of some right wing loons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Actually, from that angle
I can totally agree. The really dangerous ones are the ones who pretend to be on our side.

Unfortunately, the people in Max's state overwhelmingly want him to be right where he is. His seat isn't in jeopardy at all, as sucky as that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. A bit more to it than that, but you're on the right track
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 01:13 AM by depakid
He and his girl friend ought to be looking at indictments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ok, I nominate you to plan the next party convention. The mass crucifixion of the blue dogs will...
really be something to behold. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not into torture.
I'd settle for replacing him with a better Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Oh please
You really think he did that without Obama's blessing? If Obama wasn't living in a fantasy world in which he thought he could have a bipartisan bill, we could have had this wrapped up months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. And the DLC, the fools who are afraid of progressivism. K&R
That's why the Democratic Party is not very ambitious to advance liberal values and are so submissive to Republican intimidation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. If Coakley loses Tues.
we'll be nostalgic for Snowe and the triggered option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I'm already there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. And not Mitch McConnel, Olympia Snowe and Chuck Grassley?
.... I'd also throw in John Boehner, Jim Demint, Glen Beck, Rush and that Palin woman.

If THEY had not vowed to jeopardize the health and welfare (seems like there's something in the Constitution about that) of the American people in an effort to "destory" the President, we wouldn't be talking about this right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. +1 for Clio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Yeah, but those assholes are supposed to be opposed to us. They're Republicans.
Baucus, Conrad, Landrieu, Bayh, Nelson, Stupak, etc. (and technically Lieberdouche) call themselves "Democrats" and SHOULD be on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. They take an oath to defend the Constitution....
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 09:22 PM by Clio the Leo
.... and the Constitution says its purpose is to (among other things) "promote the general welfare." To FAIL to do so in order to score political points is high treason IMO.

The GOP has NEVER been in lock step against ANY and ALL legislation like they are now .... they do it because they have to .... they have the misfortune of being of the opposite sides of the aisle of one of the greatest political forces we have seen in our lifetimes ... but that still doesn't justify what they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. Jesus?
Is that you Pontius?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadesofgray Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. Obama enabled both of them, though. They're all in it together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. This crap is really getting ridiculous. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
22. Blame the entire party leadership for letting the health care debate drag on so long.
They should have drafted a bill during the transition period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueMTexpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
23. In all fairness to Max (and I admit that I am totally disgusted with his HC actions),
he was merely doing what Rahm Emanuel wanted him to do.
When even Harry Reid had had enough of the Joe Lieberman shenanigans, it was the Rahm team that forced him to give in to Joementum.
There is enough blame to go around ... not just one single person to crucify.
So if you're going to get all bloody about it, don't just stop at Max. I personally would begin with all Republicans. After all, they did and are continuing to do everything that they could/can to obstruct anything meaningful. They are the real villains of this debacle; let's not forget that.

******
Frankly, I prefer to get what we can on the books now, disappointing as it may be for those of us with much higher hopes and aspirations. Republicans will take nothing now as a huge victory and will continue to stall and block ANYTHING that Dems try to do. Why give them ANY encouragement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC