Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would you like him to send you a fucking PUPPY? Newsweek bemoans Obama's "cold cool"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 06:27 PM
Original message
Would you like him to send you a fucking PUPPY? Newsweek bemoans Obama's "cold cool"
Jacob Weisberg
Alone in a Crowd

Why Obama's cool comes off as cold.
Published Jan 22, 2010
From the magazine issue dated Feb 1, 2010

http://www.newsweek.com/id/232065



In electing a Republican senator, the normally liberal voters of Massachusetts were surely voicing their unhappiness over many things: unemployment, bank bailouts, the health-care plan Congress was on the verge of passing, and the expansion of government in general. But if you believe the polls, they were also expressing a degree of discontent, echoed around the country, with the president himself. Few people hate Barack Obama the way many did both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. But Middle America isn't feeling the love, and it may be for reasons that have more to do with his temperament than his policies.

The way Obama connects to people is the opposite of a Clinton, a Bush, or a Ronald Reagan. Those presidents were all relaters. They bonded with people based on common feelings, experiences, and interests. Reagan did this best through the medium of television. Bush did it best in person. Clinton could do it blindfolded and hanging upside down. For all three, connecting emotionally was part and parcel of their political skill. As a result, people tended to love them or hate them, without much neutral ground in between.

Obama's coolness and detachment put him in a different category that includes Lincoln (on the positive side) and Jimmy Carter (on the negative). His relationship with the world is primarily analytical rather than intuitive or emotional. As he acknowledged in his interview with George Stephanopoulos the day after Scott Brown's victory, his tendency to focus on substance can make him seem remote and technocratic. So while many people deeply admire him, few come away from any encounter feeling closer to him. He's not warm, loyal, or deeply involved with others. His most fervent enthusiasts tend to express affection more for the ideas he represents—America transcending its racial history, a fairer society, rational decision making—than for the man himself.

A sense of separateness from other people, organizations, and causes runs through Obama's biography. In Chicago, where I grew up, one learns to quickly place people in relation to the city's big political narrative. There was the old ethnically based Daley machine. There were the reform liberals (including my parents and their friends) who challenged it. There was the Harold Washington movement, which brought blacks into the mainstream and finally finished off the machine. Since 1989, the second Daley has presided over a synthesis of these elements. If you know this story, it's easy to locate anyone from Chicago in relation to it. The funny thing about Obama was he somehow passed through without forming the normal attachments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's the Rove method. Take your enemies' greatest strength and turn it into a weakness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You'e right...I hadn't thought of that.
I don't need warm fuzzies from a guy who stepped into the aftermath of eight years of Bush-Cheney.

My immediate reaction to the article was the desire to see a list of lifetime accomplishments from author Jacob Weisberg. Other than slinging this kind of mud, has this man actually accomplished anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. This is asinine. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Excellent point. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I bemoan Newsweek's corporate ownership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ronnie was going senile, Clinton had personal problems, and Bush was...well we know
Please. I just need a damn adult. Not a Daddy figure to hold my hand and tell me it will be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Post your comment on newsweek under this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks, I did. You can see it below, or at the link you gave me:
Got his name wrong ("Jacob" not "Jason"...ask me if I care.

:rofl:

:patriot:

Member Comments
Reply Report Abuse Posted By: AmerigoVespucci @ 01/23/2010 7:11:15 PM
Would you feel better about President Obama if he sent you a puppy, Jason? Maybe a Vermont Teddy Bear? Or one of those Harry & David baskets of fresh, ripe pears? Would that make you feel that President Obama is human?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. ..
:toast::patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. That' s so ridiculous it barely deserves publication
Obama loves people. You can see it whenever he goes into a room.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. He's calling Obama a sociopath. What an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. He's not calling him a sociopath. A sociopath would be able to superficially connect to people.
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 10:08 PM by applegrove
Obama keeps his feelings in reserve except when it comes to people close to him. You can tell he absolutely adores his wife and kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Few people hate Barack Obama the way many did both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush"
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 11:34 PM by PopSixSquish
Is this guy serious? There are a lot of people who hate him more than Clinton and W and it has nothing to do with President Obama' temperament but rather his pigment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. Great comment by someone there:
So now we finally know what's wrong with Obama: apart from the fact that he is too intelligent, he is not sufficiently troubled psychologically. He would surely be a better president if only he was perennially stuck in adolescence and had W's pathological inability to care about the distinction between right and wrong, or if only he had the hubris and callousness of Clinton. This analysis is yet another example of the media irresponsibly contributing to the rampant irrationalism and anti-intellectualism of American political discourse. With the economy in shambles, the issue of healthcare reform, environmental problems, Iraq, Afghanistan, China on the rise, etc., Newsweek is telling us that we should care about the president's ability to "connect" on an emotional level? As though there weren't already way too much mindless, destructive emoting in politics... Ninety percent of political commentary and spin has no bearing whatsoever on substance. It's all about a candidate's or a politician's ability to "connect," the image he or she projects, the vibes, and so on--because, presumably, that's what "people" care about, not policy detail. But a huge part of why most people indeed end up taking sides on the basis of such irrelevant considerations is that pundits, talking heads and columnist talk as if politics was primarily a matter of communication and marketing. The mainstream media pretend merely to respond to what people care about, passively adopting to a pre-existing demand. Yet they actually bear an enormous burden of responsibility for shaping that demand, i.e. for dumbing down political discourse and emptying it of real substance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC