Krugman (
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/28/pretending-to-be-stupid/):
"When people ask me what I think of the Obama administration, I have a stock answer: they’re not stupid and they’re not evil, which represents a vast improvement.
I stand by that position. But it’s sad that they apparently feel the need to pretend to be stupid:
"Families across the country are tightening their belts and making tough decisions. The federal government should do the
same. (Applause.) So tonight, I’m proposing specific steps to pay for the trillion dollars that it took to rescue the
economy last year.
Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. (Applause.) Spending related to our
national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary
government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and
sacrifice what we don’t. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will. (Applause.)"
This is exactly — exactly — what John Boehner said last year:
"Boehner said Americans want government to practice the same financial restraint they have been forced to exercise: “It’s
time for government to tighten their belts and show the American people that we ‘get’ it.”"
It was stupid then, and it’s stupid now.
The saving grace, such as it is, is that administration officials know better; they’re well aware that the spending freeze will make no difference to the long-run budget outlook. This is just a sop to public prejudices and/or centrist Democrats in the Senate.
But it’s a spectacular demonstration of Obama’s failure to change the narrative. Not only is he accepting the general Republican world view, he’s parroting their dumb attacks on his own policies."
But Krugman says also, "On A More Positive Note" (
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/28/on-a-more-positive-note/):
"Jon Cohn says that the speech was a modest boost in the arm for efforts to save health care reform."