Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Prepares for Possibility of 2 Supreme Court Vacancies (Stevens and Ginsburg)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 07:59 AM
Original message
White House Prepares for Possibility of 2 Supreme Court Vacancies (Stevens and Ginsburg)
White House Prepares for Possibility of 2 Supreme Court Vacancies
SCOTUS Watchers Believe Justices Stevens and Ginsburg Could Decide to Step Aside

By ARIANE de VOGUE
WASHINGTON, Jan. 4, 2010—

Lawyers for President Obama have been working behind the scenes to prepare for the possibility of one, and maybe two Supreme Court vacancies this spring.

Court watchers believe two of the more liberal members of the court, justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, could decide to step aside for reasons of age and health. That would give the president his second and third chance to shape his legacy on the Supreme Court.

Last week, when Obama took the nearly unprecedented step of criticizing the court's opinion in a major campaign finance case during his State of the Union speech, some believed he was showcasing for the American people that presidential elections, and Supreme Court nominations count.

<SNIP>

Vacancies Could Spark Political Fire

It is widely believed that Justice Stevens, 89, sent a strong signal of his intention to retire when he confirmed for The Associated Press last fall that he wasn't going to hire a full complement of clerks for next term. The justice has been coy with the press, telling USA Today's Joan Biskupic that he was surprised by the media frenzy regarding his potential retirement.

"That can't be news" he said, declining to reveal his plans. "I'm not exactly a kid."

Justice Ginsburg, 76, announced a year ago that she had undergone surgery for early stage pancreatic cancer.

Sources close to Ginsburg dismissed retirement speculation, pointing out that she has been a lively and active participant in oral arguments this term and has on several occasions expressed an interest in serving for more years to come.

In a September press release from the court, Ginsburg revealed that she had had a "comprehensive assessment of health" last summer and that she was in "completely normal health with the exception of a low red blood cell count caused by deficiency of iron."

If one or both of the justices retire, the administration would have to calculate whether it could nominate candidates who could deliver votes as consistently liberal on major ideological issues as Stevens and Ginsburg do in an age of increasingly political confirmation wars.

<SNIP>

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Supreme_Court/white-house-prepares-possibility-supreme-court-vacancies/story?id=9740077
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. We need some other vacancies
Scalia 73
Thomas 62
Kennedy 73
Roberts 55 health ?s
Alito 59 stuck w/ this turd for a long time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. By any means necessary. Of course, all replacements will have to be OKed by the pukes, so any
real liberals need not apply.

The best that will happen is another center-reich "moderate" like Sotomoyer. In the entire history of the Court, there has never been any Justice as far to the left as the five cretins you list are to the right.

It's a wonder that the courts have ever made a "good" decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Again ...
Dream on with Roberts ... Bushco left a LOT of long terms FUs to this country, and Roberts is tops ont that list. I am going to be 44 in a week, and I just HOPE to see a different Chief Justice ...

Thomas is going NOWHERE, what else is that clown going to do with his life ... Scalia will NOT willingly step down with a dem president. He will have to pretty much die to not step down under an R president ...

Kennedy is the guy, and it will be a literally holy war, most likely anarchy from the right if he leaves or his health forces him out under a D.

But, as someone else noted, with the health care these people get, they will have the 95% machine like Darth Vader and rolled into chambers at the age of 110 if possible ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I might be wrong but by their ages and the number of them the odds ....
..... favor @ least one of the nasty 5 will be gone because of health reasons or death if Obama
gets 2 terms.

My money for the next to go is Scalia

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. unfortunately, it will probably end up with the SCOTUS skewing further
right ...

I mean, with today's "liberal media" taking its talking points from Drudge, any left-center candidate would be labeled as "extremist activist loony lefties" ...

and the true "judicial activists" will be remaining on the SCOTUS ... and the medical care they receive these days will ensure that they would remain in power even if they were in a less cognitive state than Terri Schiavo ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You're probably right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. We'll see how much courage the president has - will he skew it further...
...to the corporate right and away from democracy - or will he use this opportunity to help the country reach its potential?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I disagree because Justice Sotomayor .....
Was a great pick and both Gingsburg and Stevens would likely be replaced
by a "good judge" picked by the Constitutional Law Prof., B. Obama. Real change
on the court will be seen only when Scaila, Kennedy, and Thomas go ...... and
they will ...... and if Obama is still in office. Obama is also making good picks
for the Federal Bench now but we have tons of turd buckets that were installed
by Reagan, H.W., and W that might as well be called Pro Republican Federal Judges.

If Obama gets 8 years then the SCOTUS will get a lot better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. come now ... do you really think that a "moderate" judge would be allowed
to be voted on, in today's atmosphere? The term thrown around during Bush43's years, "nuclear", would be like a Snap-n-Pop (small thing that makes a noise, not really much of an explosive) in comparison ...

Any "moderate" submitted by Obama these days would be portrayed by "the liberal media" as a psychotic radical lefty activist ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I think your right. Puke Pres. get Fascist judges while Dem. Pres. get's Conserva Dem's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's nuclear option time
(If we want Justices at least no more conservative than those who might retire)

I vote that the Federalist Society be banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Take Kennedy with you!
He is getting up there. Of course, I wold love to see Scalia retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. I've been waiting for the day this happens! Hoowah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's best if they go now, because after November there is no gurantee that the Dems
Edited on Thu Feb-04-10 09:45 AM by WI_DEM
will control the US Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC