|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:38 PM Original message |
IN-Sen: Hill would be a much better Democrat than Ellsworth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric Condon (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'd be really happy with Hill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. I don't like either to be my Senator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. Superficially, understanding the Bayh phenomenon, I see Ellsworth as easier beating the "R"s..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Hill's a pretty great campaigner, actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. You mention Coats or Hostettler. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Pence is such an incredible moron. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. But he would have to be selected by the party apparatus, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 04:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yes, the party would select |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
5. Thanks for your perspective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 03:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. They're REALLY different shades of Blue Dog though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
10. A Democrat without a 100% progressive voting record? Throw him out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 04:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
13. For clarity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC