Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sec. Sebelius: Putting Health Care in the Hands of Consumers – Not Insurance Companies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 08:10 PM
Original message
Sec. Sebelius: Putting Health Care in the Hands of Consumers – Not Insurance Companies

Putting Health Care in the Hands of Consumers – Not Insurance Companies

Posted by Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

As families across the country struggle to make ends meet in this troubled economy, many are getting difficult news: their health insurance premiums are rising. Significantly. And a new report today indicates that premiums for seniors in Medicare Advantage plans will continue to rise. This is the continuation of an unfortunate trend. This is the continuation of an unfortunate trend. Seniors who remained enrolled in their Medicare Advantage plans between 2009 and 2010 have experienced rapidly increasing premiums, at 32 percent on average, with a steeper 78 percent average increase for enrollees in private fee-for-service plans.

But while seniors are suffering, insurance companies are doing better than ever. Humana earned $452.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 from its Medicare Advantage plans, compared with $267.3 million a year earlier, a 70 percent increase. At the same time, these companies are being vastly overpaid by the federal government, making huge profits and sticking seniors with higher bills.

This news comes just one day after we at the Department of Health and Human Services released a report showing how insurance companies are driving up premiums at unnecessary, alarming rates. In California, beneficiaries recently received letters from Anthem Blue Cross announcing their rates would go up as high as 39 percent. Elsewhere, in the last year alone, large insurers have requested premium increases of 56 percent in Michigan, 24 percent in Connecticut, 23 percent in Maine, 20 percent in Oregon and 16 percent in Rhode Island.

What makes this harder to take is that insurance premiums aren’t the only numbers on the rise -- insurance industry profits are also growing by leaps and bounds. The five largest health insurance companies – WellPoint, UnitedHealth Group, Cigna, Aetna, and Humana – earned combined profits of $12.2 billion in 2009, 56 percent more than the previous year. Moreover, the CEOs of these same companies are each taking home up to $24 million per year.

Insurance companies say that if consumers don’t like it, they can shop elsewhere. Yet we all know that finding a policy on the individual market is not as easy as it sounds. In many cases, insurers can slash your coverage when you need it most. If you have a pre-existing condition, they may deny you coverage altogether.

To show how out of touch insurance companies are with middle-class families, a recent study found that nearly 75 percent of consumers looking for coverage on the individual market never bought a plan – and most of them cited cost as their primary reason. Yet insurers are turning a blind eye. As reported in Arkansas, one Blue Cross plan wanted to increase rates by 28 percent, but regulators forced the plan to settle for just 11 percent. In a broken health care system without competition, transparency, or choice there is little stopping insurance companies from jacking up rates, and putting greater costs onto the backs of working Americans.

Our broken system is working for insurance companies, not families. While profits and premiums are going up, coverage is going down. And three of the top five insurers cut the proportion of premiums they spent on customers' medical care last year, committing more to salaries, administrative expenses, and profits.

Without health insurance reform, we will continue to get more of the same. That is unacceptable.

Reform will protect consumers from abusive insurance industry practices. It will encourage competition among insurance companies in order to drive down costs and offer consumers choices to get the coverage that’s right for them. Reform will also bring down premiums and limit out-of-pocket costs that eat into the family budget.

These efforts won’t just help our health care system – they will also help our economy. Lowering health care costs through reform could generate between 250,000 and 400,000 jobs a year.

It's time we put the health of American families back in the hands of consumers – not the insurance industry.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gotta admire these people who
keep doing their best in spite of all the ugliness trying to bring them down.:patriot::patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. We are NOT fucking consumers!
We are PEOPLE! We don't merely exist to feed corporate America's greed. That is the problem with today's democratic party--they buy into all the rhetoric and ideas of the rethuglicans without ever realizing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. You don't understand the term "consumer".
Producers of goods can also be consumers, since oftentimes they must consume some goods in order to manufacture other goods.

A farmer produces food, but he must also consume fertilizer, feed/seed, farm equipment, fuel, etc.

A car company manufactures cars, but they also consume steel, plastic, energy, etc.

When speaking of economics, you must always speak in terms of producers and consumers. But not all consumers are people. And a consumer in one scenario might be a producer in another.

It has nothing to do with your personhood.

Having stated that, I still don't believe that corporations should be allowed to fund candidates. If they can't vote, they shouldn't be allowed to contribute campaign funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yup, I'm not a consumer but a patient. I'm not shopping but rather seeking treatment
This is of course more market based bullshit, see the deal is the "consumer" will now get to be their very own death panel by being forced to try picking which ailments to treat and which to ignore based on what they can afford to deal with versus the immediate severity of the problem and hope for the best.

The average American is not a doctor and depends heavily upon trained professionals to guide them to the most appropriate treatment and as such cannot decide to go Rustler over Levis or hamburger instead of steak for a meal.

This entire mentality is born out of having to provide some plausible element of cost containment but without touching such sacred cows as the employer based system or health industry profits so a wrongheaded and dishonest campaign was launched to pretend the real problem is over usage despite most people probably giving the doctors office too wide a berth to keep a step ahead of illness.

"Consumer" based healthcare is a fraud and millions of desperate, quiet, and confused little death panels waiting to happen all over this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Does this mean she now opposes the mandated purchase of insurance from those companies?
Cause that is the only way this could make any sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. She's putting them on notice
that if they raise rates again, they will have to write her another letter of explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. LOLLLLLL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC