Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GAME ON.... (and we can still get a public option)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:57 AM
Original message
GAME ON.... (and we can still get a public option)
GAME ON....

<...>

There's no public option, though there wasn't expected to be one, and its fate will be considered later in the Senate.

Perhaps most importantly, Obama's plan improves the subsidy rates for those who'll be buying coverage, with a more generous package for the middle class than the Senate legislation.

As for legislative strategy, the White House seems fully on board with pursuing reconciliation in the Senate.

"The President expects and believes the American people deserve an up or down vote on health reform," White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer said on the call.

Pfeiffer said no decision had been made how to proceed, pending the outcome of the summit. But he added that Obama's proposal is designed to have "maximum flexibility to ensure that we can get an up or down vote if the opposition decides to take the extraordinary step of filibustering health reform."

That is the right way to characterize this -- call for an up-or-down vote, and characterize Republican obstructionism as something "extraordinary." If the GOP refuses to play a constructive role, Dems will have no choice but to proceed anyway.

more






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is the right strategy as Rethugs will never get on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohiodemocratic Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. How likely do you think it is for us to get 51 votes for the P.O.? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. If we get a PO, I will buy you a nice cigar.
And it will be my pleasure to do so.

But I have abandoned all "hope."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. We can but....
.... with the President NOT including it in HIS plan, it gives those in Congress who are opposed to it an excuse.

To his credit, the PO rally didn't happen until last week, after the Presiden't plan had been written.

But perhaps this allows the WH and Congress to play good cop/bad cop with the PO. The President has offered a plan WITHOUT a PO ... one which the GOP will no doubt filibuster. When they do that, the Senate will have an excuse to include a PO via reconciliation.

.... IF we can get 50 senators on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't think so.
There are a lot of Senators pushing it. There were more than 50 votes for a public option. It's understandable that the President wouldn't include it in the plan for the summit.

Anything can happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sounds like a time to return to one of my favorite poems...
"Listen to the mustn'ts, child. Listen to the don'ts. Listen to the shouldn'ts, the impossibles, the won'ts. Listen to the never haves, then listen close to me... Anything can happen, child. Anything can be."
— Shel Silverstein
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. PO RIP N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Premature. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Odd how certain folks never mention pressuring Congress and Obama
for the public option by mentioning what they can do, just sort of mentioning how you can still have it while the President leaves it out and pressures its removal.

http://whipcongress.com/

Trust Obama and Dem Leadership, folks, sure sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC