Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, when he said the bill he signs "must include a public option" he didn't really mean it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:11 PM
Original message
So, when he said the bill he signs "must include a public option" he didn't really mean it?
Edited on Tue Feb-23-10 09:12 PM by rateyes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. it sure rallied him a lot of support though didn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. This time. Not next time; nobody will believe any of his campaign promises. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warm regards Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. Believing in campaign promises is like believing in the Easter Bunny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Perhaps we should insist on a contract in writing?
Really, there's no doubt that Obama *COULD* have executed on
quite a few of his campaign promises. Many were entirely possible
just considering the power of the Executive branch. Many others
were possible given the enormous mandate and momentum that
the elections of 2006 and 2008 had provided.

But he defaulted.

The only conclusion I can draw now is that he knowingly lied.

And if you think my believing his public, oft-repeated promises
prior to the election is the equivalent of "believing in the Easter
Bunny", then we have nothing further to say to each other.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Guess not. Wish he'd fought for it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
58. It really makes them look like wussies. Rahmbo my ass. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think he meant it at the time, then realized what he was up against when he
went wading in the shark-infested waters.

He needs to acknowledge that, IMO -- not just pretend that we're doing what we can. "I know I promised you PO, but here's why I can't deliver it now..." something like that. Although we all do think he CAN deliver it now.

I know only that we won't know anything for sure until something is sitting on Obama's desk and he's picking up the pen to sign it. I never thought there would be over 20 Senators signing onto the letter to Reid, so... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. A campaign promise broken? Hmmm What else is new?
Edited on Tue Feb-23-10 09:34 PM by BrklynLiberal
Altho this was a lot more disappointing than most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Yep, all you have to do is ignore how everything changed between
the time he made that statement and now, and he should be impeached for lying.

:eyes:'


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. The argument that things changed would hold more water
if he at least made some effort to fight for the public option. He didn't.

On Day 1 he promised the insurance companies that if the government offered any insurance plans the government would not under-price them. He guaranteed that they would remain competitive, necessary and profitable. They was the death of the public option right there.

Why have a public option if it can't offer anything cheaper or better than what the insurance companies offer?

And then when people tried to fight for a public option anyway, he didn't join them. He did not fight for the public option. He talked about it, but he refused to fight for it or defend it. Instead it negotiated it away, by giving in to republicans and conservative democrats every time they challenged him. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. So now he's being rejected for not trying hard enough in public for you?


This is all good. I like learning what DU is becoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
46. You're being disingenous.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Explain to me how.
the monday morning quarterbacking and back biting and selective memory astounds.

Single payer never had a chance,

the public option might happen if two million people show up on the Mall in Washington.

Much easier to complain and bloviate on the Du here.


:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. It would have had a chance if the person we elected to create
Change We Can Believe In had supported it, and had tried to rally the people who supported him. But he didn't support it, and he didn't make any effort to rally people to create that public momentum.

For some reason he things the public doesn't want a public option, which shows that he doesn't listen to the public very much.

On a political discussion board we're not only entitled to discuss this stuff, that's what we are here to do. Insulting me for it is, again, disingenuous.

So go take your insults, and your insulting smilie and shove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Aw, wassa matta?
Apparently 'discussing' is only OK when you're bloviating.

Kewel. I'll go talk to the adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Right. Another insult. And you call yourself the adult?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Stop snivelling. What was your 'original' point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Stop being insulting in every fucking post.
I know what my point was. Your only point was to insult, insult, insult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. And yet, another refusal to make a point except to whine about what I say.
You sound like Boehner.

Now THAT's an insult.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaydeeBug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #55
63. well, YOUR point was that he should be impeached for lying (sic)
so maybe you should stick with that. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
70. It worked out well for Bush 41.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm almost certain he meant it! He just didn't realize the 'kind' of
opposition he would encounter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. Then why wasn't single payer ever on the table?
Why weren't advocates for it ever included in the negotiations?

If he really ever meant it he would have brought in allies who supported it. He didn't.

I think the idea that he supported a public option is based on faith, not fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
62. Because single payer would be breaking a promise, too.
"If you like the plan you have, you can keep it!"

Single payer would have eliminated union-fought healthcare benefits as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
67. One thing has nothing to do with the other. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Personally
I don't think he ever meant it. The fact that Obama wouldn't even put single payer on the table leads me to believe that he felt the 'public option' was his big trump card when it came to the health care game. He figured if he could get close to what he wanted he could then sacrifice the public option to get the bill that was his goal to begin with. Like most Presidents I don't know if this is all Obama's idea or if he is being heavily influenced by people like Emmanuel (sp?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's a fierce advocate for all kinds of things
Until he's in a position to actually make them happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. He talks a good talk, until he has to deliver, and then he's silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Obama's proposal makes the fixes to the Senate bill that the "father of the public option" suggested
Edited on Tue Feb-23-10 09:57 PM by quiet.american
People are stuck on the words "public option" like it's some kind of hypnotic mantra without understanding half the time what they're talking about.

Jacob Hacker, who is credited with coming up with the idea of the public option still supports the Senate bill and made a series of suggestions that Obama appears to have taken very seriously because nearly all of them are in Obama's proposal. Hacker himself said the public option was meant as a means to an end. His suggestions that Obama have taken up are that means to an end. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, Google, Jacob Hacker, "Why I Still Believe in the Senate Bill."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Exactly..thank you quietamerican..
but then people can't complain about the word "public option".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yea ... Obama should definetly veto any bill with no public option.
Great plan.

Then what ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. If you really feel that way . . .
maybe you should sign on to the MoveOn Virtual March tomorrow - Wed. Feb. 24. If Obama is going to let the Senate decide, it's up to us to let our Senators know we want a PUBLIC OPTION or MEDICARE FOR ALL and that kissing up to so-called "moderate" Republicans and "conservative" Democrats will not help them in November. It might work and it can't hurt.

Sign up here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. thanks, janet. I signed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. MoveOn has been advocating for a PO, not Medicare for All, and as far
as I know you cannot choose which one want you want at their link.

:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. When you call your senators . . .
Edited on Wed Feb-24-10 10:47 AM by janet118
you can advocate for anything you want to . . . just do it. The numbers of callers expressing support for health care reform that actually helps the middle class, the underemployed, the self-employed, and all the others that fall through the cracks when insurance companies have no real competition or regulation is what is important. We are paying attention.

MoveOn just makes the calling easy, they don't tell you what to say.

I just called Senators Kerry and Brown in Massachusetts. We know more than any other state what a health care system without competition does. We have the "Romney Plan" which is very similar to the original plan the Senate came up with. I avoid going to the doctor because my "affordable" insurance doesn't cover enough for me to afford paying the premiums and the high deductibles and co-pays for the tests he orders.

Please call and say whatever you want about health care. Let them know we are hurting out here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. Just saying - when you sign the MoveOn link it is not for Medicare for All
sure you can call for any reason, but people should know this is not a Medicare for All movement.

Actually the fax does not even mention the PO.

I've let my reps know that we need a real discussion on health care.

:)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. He meant the mandate for sure but DUers didn't seem to like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
44. He opposed mandates as candidate, in extreme terms
He also painted Clinton's support of mandates as flawed and larcenous. He said trying to solve the health care problem by mandating purchase is like trying to solve the homeless problem by passing a law that everybody had to buy a house.
He said that affordable products offering excellent value do not need mandates, that only over priced and under performing products need to be forced on people.
He said it live, he said it in print, he made commercials and mailers and in all of them he opposed mandates and mocked Clinton for supporting them.
So your odd comment seems delusional. He won the Primary by opposing mandates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. By jove, I believe you've got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA!
yeah right - just like his other "promises"...

that's a good one, tho...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. He could deliver it if he wanted to.
Polls show PEOPLE WANT IT!

So why aren't we getting it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. Uh, Congress. You know - all those guys over there in the ice-cream shaped
building who bloviate on the television.

They don't want it more than he wants it.

People shaw do think it's like snapping his fingers. Shaw 'Nuff.

Look at the fucking tools he has in the DEMOCRATIC party to deal with.

He has 22 or 23 sigs on a page asking for the public option.

Now you tell me SPECIFICALLY how the fuck he gets the other 26 or 27.

I just love the backseat drivers and the demi-experts around here.

:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Exactly
And people who sit back and wait for a President to deliver things to them are pathetic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Pathetic is precisely the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. Maybe this would help...



:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Karlson Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. He swapped the PO for the Jobs Bill, maybe?
Senator Snowe said she had received a personal phone call from the president, and only afterward changed her vote for the (cloture on the) jobs bill from "no" to "yes".

I guess Obama promised to leave the Public option out in return for those votes on the jobs bill (Snowe, Brown, Collins, Voinovich...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. Unfortunately
Edited on Wed Feb-24-10 08:50 AM by LatteLibertine
things have changed since July 2009.

HCR needs to be passed. Passing HCR will make further reform in the future easier. Passing nothing = hello Republicans in 2010 and 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. He never meant it
I am sure it had something to do with a backroom deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. He found out it's much more lucrative to be a Fierce Advocate for the Insurance Industry.
Seriously though, I truly doubt he was ever FOR any form of public option....rather it was just a product of the "Progressive Mantle" that DLC Dems don for campaign purposes, and then discard immediately after being elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. It was never important to him. He got the idea somewhere and it polled well, I guess.
He used it when he needed it, dropped it when addressing different audiences, then just let it go and pretended he never heard of it.

The only thing that ever really mattered was getting that mandate to fill the coffers of the insurance companies.

That is what this has all been about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. I've always felt that way, too. In the primaries, Hillary had
the passion for health care, and Obama would add a "me too" response, but never with the passion of other issues that he talked about.

I think his support for the public option was only to position himself better within the party during the primaries. Nothing more.

Once President, he tried to use the health care bill as an example of how he could get big things done in a bipartisan way. Here the process was more important than the issue. That would explain his over-patience with the gang of six. I think he wanted the health care bill to set up a coalition that would also pass cap and trade, bank regulation, etc. This explains why he never has anything negative to say about Baucus or Liebermann, but has big issues with Dean, Weiner, and the House progressives that insisted on some form of public option in lieu of single payer.

If it's not bipartisan, it's not Obama. Process over policy. Boy, has he lost his way. Too bad for us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Yes, we are all victims of a ridiculous (and doomed) political fantasy.
Edited on Wed Feb-24-10 03:14 PM by freddie mertz
So, how do we send the wake-up call?

What is our next move?

He has long ago abandoned us to this nonsense.

I don't see anywhere to turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Wake up calls have been sent his way from many
Edited on Wed Feb-24-10 08:00 PM by mochajava666
prominent people and politicians. I can only assume that he has rejected the call to be a bold leader with an "urgency of now" in the face of intransigent opposition, and has become intransigent himself with his commitment to the process of bipartisanship above policy. After all, he has been passionate about the No Red states, No Blue states, just the United States meme. I thought that was to focus on the majority of beliefs we all have in common as Americans. It didn't mean to capitulate to the opposition and abandon our core beliefs to make it appear bipartisan.

I keep hoping that he will be like Rocky in Rocky II, where he waits until the last minute to switch to South-Paw. He has wasted more than a year trying to appease the conservatives in order to get them to work with him. Hopefully, he will turn into a real leader by threatening to expose their hypocrisy. He did say he planned on calling out people back when he was candidate. Of course he said a lot of things.

I wish for things like calling out Joe Lieberman for killing health care and taking away his chairmanship and seniority in the democratic caucus. I hope he will ask the fiscal hawks that demand spending cuts to propose what cuts they want in their own districts. I want him to have them explain why they voted for the Bush tax cuts, but now worry about the deficit when the money will be spent on the poor and disadvantaged.

I loved the first meeting he had with the republicans. He was a man among boys, so to speak. Hopefully round 2 will be the same. I am also heartened to see the republicans break ranks on the jobs bill.

What to do? I'll keep bothering Feingold and Kohl, my 2 senators, and wait and see. I don't think this has completely played out yet. I sense something in the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #43
57. MAssachusetts tried, but the Democrats seem to have mostly hit "snooze" again.
Maybe the louder November 2nd call will awaken them?

It's certainly going to unseat them.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. Stop griping . . . er, typing . . . and call the bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
35. Of course he meant it
He has to deal with the reality of being in the WH now - he'd have to veto the bills he could get out of this Congress.

Being inflexible is Republican-like. You learn more in life as you go. Sometimes you have to change your mind.

I don't see that vetoing what he could get out of Congress because it does not contain the PO would be best for the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. he said it last summer
Edited on Wed Feb-24-10 03:31 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
he was president at the time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
36. What? Straight shooter Obama was puttin' us on?!?!? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. make me fucking care.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
40. From "Hope and Change" to "Hopelessly Changed" . . .
all in little more than a year. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
48. it was wishful thinking
or maybe a veiled threat to the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-24-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
50. it seems those were empty campaign slogans.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
53. A Politician Lied?!?!?! My world is shattered!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #53
71. Then why not just vote for a Republican, if lies are to be expected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
61. Some DU'ers would argue he never said it at all.
Others would loudly shout "HE'S BETTER THAN MCCAIN, ISN'T HE?" and still others would make the claim that anything said on the way to beating the repugs is OKAY in their book, as long as our side won. Don't forget the group who tries to convince you that you're taking His words out of context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
66. That's a question he'll have to find an answer to in a couple of years.
In the meantime maybe he could come up with something to raise money and bring out the vote, because from what I'm seeing so far, unless the Republicans run Cheney / Palin, I'm not even going to bother to vote in 2012.

The system is broken.

I now give all my (political) money to:
http://www.freeclinics.us

March 27, 2010 Atlanta GA is the site for the next Communities Are Responding Everyday (C.A.R.E.) Clinic.

If you would like to volunteer please visit http://www.regonline.com/atlanta_care_clinic

Patients may call 1-877-233-5159

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
68. he said unless the bill included ways to lower costs that are more efficient
so reluctantly I give him a pass on this--wiggle room, even though I don't believe anything is as good at controlling costs as single payer, and I'm sure Obama must know this too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
69. Maybe no. But I now get the feeling that if public option did come to his desk he would sign it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC