Wanted: surgeon to remove the media from McCain's ass

So since there is no reason to watch MTP, I'll sleep in. The hell with NBC and their show, which should be named "Meet the republican".

Ratings for Sunday's MTP will be the lowest in more than 11 months.

January 23, 2010 to be exact..

john mcpalin has been on Sunday gashows 19 times since Obama
took office one year ago..

Meet The Press Mailbox.. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6872152/

<snip>

By Steve Benen

"Yes, we've reached the first anniversary of President Obama's inauguration, so it's time once again to have John McCain appear on yet another Sunday morning talk show.

For those keeping score, this will be McCain's 19th appearance on a Sunday morning talk show since Obama took office 12 months ago. That's an average of one appearance every 2.9 weeks for a year -- more than any other public official in the country.

"Since the president's inauguration, McCain has been on "Meet the Press" three times (December 6, July 12, and March 29), "This Week" three times (September 27, August 23, and May 10), "Fox News Sunday" four times (December 20, July 2, March 8, and January 25), and CNN's "State of the Union" four times (January 10, October 11, August 2, and February 15). His appearance on "Face the Nation" will be his fifth in the last year (January 24, October 25, August 30, April 26, and February 8).

Congratulations, "Face the Nation," you're now in the lead.

And who, exactly, is John McCain? He's the one who lost the 2008 presidential race badly, and is now just another reactionary conservative senator in the minority. He's not in the party leadership; he has no role in any important negotiations on any issue; and he's offered no significant pieces of legislation. By all appearances, McCain isn't even especially influential among his own GOP colleagues.

There's just no reason for the media's obsession with McCain. None. Nineteen Sunday-show appearances in 12 months? It's farcical.

Of course, if "Face the Nation" is going to go to the trouble of having McCain on once again, Bob Schieffer could, in theory, ask the senator to explain why he humiliated himself during a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing this week. For those who missed it, McCain insisted that Christmas/underwear bomber Umar Abdulmutallab bought a one-way ticket from Nigeria to Detroit. That's completely wrong. When National Counterterrorism Center Director Michael Leiter tried to explain reality, McCain became visibly annoyed, forcing Leiter to apologize for being correct."

<scroll down>
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=388x14402

Meet The Press Mailbox.. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6872152/

and the HCR Summit yesterday. And Obama won't be able to rebut it. Nor will David Gregory or anyone else. :eyes:

I don't know if anyone else has a better email contact to let them know what is thought of mccain getting all that propaganda time?

That's the only one I've seen, too.

Sunday morning talk has become as worthless as cable news.

Most of the journalists he has on don't have a political agenda and try to actually speak with some integrity.

... the teabaggers hate him and he's viewed as incompetent by the moderates.

If he wants to step up to be the face of the GOP, let him.

The Maximum protection variety :rofl:
:hide:

McCain might have to have them lanced...

Nothing to see it seems.

ever witnessed; showed himself to be completely detached from citizens and their concerns; consistently appears desperate...and, is as stupid as a stick. Why does the media pay him any attention?

On the charisma scale, he's two points above "painful rectal itch" and a point lower that gonorrhea...:eyes:

denied

At the time, the networks' excuse was that Republicans were in power so, naturally, their guest lists heavily skewed Republican.
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:3EkSVy1kk2MJ:mediamatters.org/static/pdf/MMFA_Sunday_Show_Report.pdf+%22if+it's+sunday%22+media+matters&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiIxd-ZfHxYyr60NbeCjfxdp7VYZrdODSNNmdsI6xo9oqhI_HsCwubcILL4WWhBuLd3_u9Qh846n2MN2yW713qWCyqMs_ZhwnE8cwltQU1idcogcctY5kuIXFiRBVrCX1hhHwea&sig=AHIEtbR5ivQWoCgiuhbajTj8UjLHQOUCtw

So, what's their excuse now?

about the Kenyan in our whitehouse."The vast wasteland",television for fools.

have invested a hell of a lot of money in McCain. IMO that's why he won't disappear. They want a return on their investment.

Financial sector investment from 1989-2009 = almost 36mil.

http://ow.ly/UyZe

My point is he's still likely got a good deal of movers and shakers pushing for him. Most of our media is owned by a few corporations.

otherwise, I'm sure I'd be depressed!

http://mediamatters.org/reports/200602140002

"If It's Sunday, It's Conservative: An analysis of the Sunday talk show guests on ABC, CBS, and NBC, 1997 - 2005

Executive Summary

The Sunday-morning talk shows on ABC, CBS, and NBC are where the prevailing opinions are aired and tested, policymakers state their cases, and the left and right in American politics debate the pressing issues of the day on equal ground. Both sides have their say and face probing questions. Or so you would think.

In fact, as this study reveals, conservative voices significantly outnumber progressive voices on the Sunday talk shows. Media Matters for America conducted a content analysis of ABC's This Week, CBS' Face the Nation, and NBC's Meet the Press, classifying each one of the nearly 7,000 guest appearances during President Bill Clinton's second term, President George W. Bush's first term, and the year 2005 as either Democrat, Republican, conservative, progressive, or neutral. The conclusion is clear: Republicans and conservatives have been offered more opportunities to appear on the Sunday shows - in some cases, dramatically so.

Among the study's key findings:

The balance between Democrats/progressives and Republicans/conservatives was roughly equal during Clinton's second term, with a slight edge toward Republicans/conservatives: 52 percent of the ideologically identifiable guests were from the right, and 48 percent were from the left. But in Bush's first term, Republicans/ conservatives held a dramatic advantage, outnumbering Democrats/progressives by 58 percent to 42 percent. In 2005, the figures were an identical 58 percent to 42 percent.
Counting only elected officials and administration representatives, Democrats had a small advantage during Clinton's second term: 53 percent to 45 percent. In Bush's first term, however, the Republican advantage was 61 percent to 39 percent -- nearly three times as large."