Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dick Cheney would have died long ago if he didn't have government-run health care

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 06:34 PM
Original message
Dick Cheney would have died long ago if he didn't have government-run health care

Cheney photographed asleep at emergency meeting as VP in 2006

Cheney is a classic case of how being in positions of government, with its government-run single payer health care, has helped him since 1978. After his first heart attack (where he didn't have government-run health care), he has had

If Cheney had lived in a World where coverage was taken away due to pre-existing conditions, he would have gone broke and probably would have died due to not being able to sustain coverage for his horrific health.

1978 - Heart attack #1 (age 37)
1984 - Heart attack #2
1988-06 - Heart attack #3
1988-08 - Coronary bypass surgery
2000-11 - Heart attack #4
2000-11 - Coronary stent placed
2000-11 - Abnormal heart function
2001-03 - Unstable angina
2001-03 - Coronary angioplasty
2001-06 - Cardiac defibrillator implanted
2005-09 - Popliteal artery aneurysm repair
2006-01 - Congestive heart failure
2007-03 - Venous thrombosis
2007-11 - Atrial fibrillation
2009-02 - Heart attack #5

Imagine a health insurance company getting this assessment about a patient before they deny him coverage due to pre-existing conditions:

Vice President Cheney is a vasculopath with an almost 30-year history of coronary atherosclerosis. His history includes multiple myocardial infarctions, moderate (or possibly worse) left ventricular dysfunction, cardiac electrical instability, and presumed peripheral atherosclerotic disease. The extent of his extra-cardiac atherosclerosis is unknown. His medications are unknown. He smoked heavily from ages 17-37 and takes one or more hypocholesterolemic medications. The control of his cholesterol is excellent, but the control of his blood pressure is unknown. His weight is unknown. He lost 20-25 pounds in the 2000-2001 timeframe , but he is still appears overweight <1>. It is unknown whether he has diabetes, glucose intolerance, or normal glucose tolerance.

(http://www.doctorzebra.com/prez/a_cheney.htm)




If it wasn't for Obama's "radical" approach to health care reform and goverment-run health care that he has used repeatedly to stay alive, Cheney would have taken a dirt nap a long time ago.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. McCain's another one who has lived his entire life off the public teat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mr. Cheney's health care is NOT run by the government.
Assuming he is using the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan, as a retired Federal Employee, he has selected one of the many insurance plans among which all such employees may choose. His CARE is provided by hospitals and doctors generally available.

http://www.opm.gov/insure/federal_employ/index.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. How does he get his health care package? The private sector?
Um... you are utterly missing the point.

No, the doctors are not government workers necessarily. But the health care packages that Cheney was given were run by the government. He didn't call some fellas in Laramie to hook him up with a privately-run health insurance package. He got his coverage from the government. He got choices from what the government offered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:17 PM
Original message
As I think I said, the insurance system he may participate in
is available to all Federal employees, and retirees if they choose to use it. He (and I, and my husband, and millions of others) receive the 'package' as soon as we became Federal employees.

The Office of Personnel Management (opm) asks insurance companies if they would like to offer policies that conform to opm's requirement to Federal employees.

Read all about it:

http://www.opm.gov/insure/federal_employ/index.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Yes, he gets it from the private sector. Well, he's probably on Medicare now
But before 65 I would assume he had private insurance just like all other federal employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. you keep saying things like that--but offer no proof of just what system he is using. how about
backing up your assertions, please? ASSUMING is NOT any sort of proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Because I'm not a friend of Cheney's, I DON'T KNOW
which insurance company he's using. The only PROOF I have that his care is payed for by one of the insurance carriers available thru the Federal Employees Health Benefit plan is LOGIC: the choices are many, varied, and are decently priced. Read about them.

http://www.opm.gov/insure/federal_employ/index.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. If he were dealing in the private sector,
he would have been dropped ages ago. He is being protected because of his involvement in the government insurance programs that are availble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Right, same as millions of Federal employees.
We have an excellent program, and many would like it to be available to everyone. Employees pay a premium, and the employer, the Federal government, pays the remainder. The insurance companies are the same that non-government employees use, but the government has the clout to require attributes that others don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. The government has no more clout than any other large employer.*
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 08:28 PM by DrToast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. With about 2.0 million civilian employees,
the Federal Government, excluding the Postal Service, is the Nation's largest employer.

http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can't believe I'm seeing such an
anti HCR post here at DU!!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:11 PM
Original message
Boy, exactly what I was thinking. Keeping Cheney alive is not
a great thing to advertise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. ,,
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Its kind of like the first amendment:
If put to a vote, MANY woulds NOT support it, as freedom of speech is available to you, me, AND OTHERS WITH WHOM WE DISAGREE, whose speech we hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. You DO realize it was a joke? Right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yes and no; same as First Amendment.
We're for it when it goes our way, and we're against it when it doesn't; depends on what 'it' is.

:dilemma:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say.
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 10:00 PM by verges
I actually do defend the right of people (even Repubs and Teabaggers) to speak their minds. The first amendment, to me, is the MOST important part of the US Constitution.

I believe Voltaire said something along the lines of: "I may not agree with what you say; but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

But it seems to me that part of the freedom of speech is also accepting that you are then open to freedom of criticism from your opposition.


That said, now referring back to my original joke, it doesn't seem unreasonable to expect support of liberal, progressive Democratic principles uch as HCR on DU (and the OP wasn't really anti-HCR). And BTW freedom of speech really doesn't apply here on DU. It, as a moderated forum, is subject to censorship by it's moderators.


Edit: sp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am on my way to the hospital to visit a friend who suffered cardiac arrest on monday.
the doctors will take her off the ventilators this monday--and, frankly, the best outcome would be for her NOT to start breathing, as, in all likelihood, she will be a vegetable.

she hasn't had any kind of decent health care, very little insurance, very little money. had SHE had the kind of coverage darth cheney has, maybe, just maybe, some of her health problems could have been addressed much earlier. and maybe, just maybe, I wouldn't be waiting in dread for monday morning.

FU to all those who are blocking any actual health CARE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Wow... my thoughts go out to you and your friend at this sad time
Words can't express what that situation is. All the best in any efforts to get through that horrible situation.

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. thank you so much for your kind thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. He'd still be alive without FEHBP or MediCare. He was already rich.
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 07:12 PM by 4lbs
He made tens of millions of dollars in the private sector before being the VP.

Remember, he was the CEO and Chairman of Halliburton and got paid a huge sum of money for it annually.

Before that, he was on the board of American Enterprise Institute.

By the time he became VP, he was already worth about $50 million.


He's likely worth about $100 million now, as he's getting about $8 million annually from various entities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Agreed, but my point is that he has to thank government-run health care many others don't have
Yes, he's wealthy and could buy a wing of a hospital if he wanted... but the mere fact that he has used government-run health care all these years to survive completely prove the point that it's not the big bad boogie man...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh, yeah. True. Even though he could afford to set aside $3 million as a personal "health savings
account", he figured he'd live on the taxpayer tit.

Yet, he and his ilk don't want any of us to be able to do that. Unless we have $20+ million that is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. most rich guys have the first dollar they ever made, so we all are pretty sure he
is making use of any program that is available to him as a former federal employee, former VP, or as a person over 65.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Wasn't he a Rep for Wyoming? He also worked for Ford, didn't he?
He had good insurance when he was a federal employee a long time ago, plus he was rich after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. He should have never been allowed to be VP
1978 - Heart attack #1 (age 37)
1984 - Heart attack #2
1988-06 - Heart attack #3
1988-08 - Coronary bypass surgery
2000-11 - Heart attack #4
2000-11 - Coronary stent placed
2000-11 - Abnormal heart function
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, that's the first good argument I've heard against government-run health care.
Edited on Sat Feb-27-10 07:32 PM by Fly by night
Maybe we can pull it from all those anti-socialist Rethug Congresscritters soon, whether they want to surrender their coverage or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Please recognize the difference between 'government-run' health care,
as for the Military, and medical insurance programs OFFERED THRU the government, which is what Federal employees and retirees have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Please recognize hyperbole and sarcasm when I type it.
'k?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstinamotorcity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. And we know that
if every American had that same type of government run health care the life expectancy for individuals would greatly increase.Which is what Repugs don't want.Plain and Simple.A Presidential success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. He did die long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VPStoltz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-27-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. The same with Ronnie Rayguns when he was shot.
His party, with his support, had proposed closing (defunding) the type of emergency clinic to which he was taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-28-10 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. You put that together really well. Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-28-10 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
33. If only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC