Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PA-Sen: Quinnipiac Gives Specter 7-Point Lead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:42 PM
Original message
PA-Sen: Quinnipiac Gives Specter 7-Point Lead
Quinnipiac (2/22-28, registered voters, 12/8-14 in parentheses):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 49 (44)
Pat Toomey (R): 42 (44)
Undecided: 8 (11)

Joe Sestak (D): 36 (35)
Pat Toomey (R): 39 (40)
Undecided: 24 (22)
(MoE: ±2.6%)

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 53 (53)
Joe Sestak (D): 29 (30)
Undecided: 14 (15)
(MoE: ±3.9%)

This ought to shake up some of that growing pessimism about the Pennsylvania Senate race -- although most of that pessimism seems to come from the fact that only Rasmussen and Franklin & Marshall have been polling this race reliably for the last few months. (And recall that Franklin & Marshall offers both LV and RV models, where Toomey wins the LV matchup and Specter the RV matchup, meaning that, well, Rasmussen and Quinnipiac -- which is polling registered voters right now -- may both be right.)

The improvement in the matchup between Arlen Specter and Pat Toomey is all the more interesting because Specter and Joe Sestak have been going hammer and tongs at each other while Toomey is out of the fray. In fact, Toomey's favorables indicate how unbesmirched he really is: he's at 26/8, with a whopping 65% "haven't heard enough" (note to Specter or DSCC or somebody: start defining Toomey as Club for Growth wingnut ASAP). Sestak is in a similar boat, with favorables of 18/6, while pretty much everyone has already decided about Specter, who has an approval of 48/45, which has changed very little since December's 47/45. I hate to start prematurely acting like the Democrats have weathered the worst of the storm and the momentum going into November has changed direction, but with nothing else having significantly changed about this race in the last few months, it seems like changes in the national environment have to be at least partially responsible here for the changed toplines. (Discussion underway in conspiracy's diary too.)

http://www.swingstateproject.com/diary/6491/pasen-quinnipiac-gives-specter-7point-lead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not yet ready to begin thinking about considering the 2010 elections
I remain in decompression mode from the very exhausting 2008 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unlike Lieberman, Specter did shift Leftwards. It will be interesting to see what he does
in the general election. Will he revert to his conservative roots or will he keep leaning Left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. I had a feeling Specter would rebound (of course Scott Brown's win made me have my doubts)
Edited on Tue Mar-02-10 04:20 PM by Hippo_Tron
Toomey is a lightweight and being associated with the Club For Greed isn't going to help him. If Specter wins, it's doubtful the GOP will be able to take the Senate. I really hope they don't take the House, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC