Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The health care bill is a huge improvement over the status quo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:46 AM
Original message
The health care bill is a huge improvement over the status quo
First, some are throwing around the claim that this is an insurance reform, not health care reform? What is that supposed to mean? The point is to reform the health care system. Switching to single payer isn't health care either. The system is not the care. Insurance pays for access to health care. Insurers have been denying access to health care and will be banned from doing so when reform is passed. Their profits will be limited and the government will have greater control over rate increases. As for health care, that is provided by doctors.

Anyway, here are some of the reasons the current reform effort is a huge improvement over the status quo:

More Health Insurance Choices

  • Multi-state option. Health insurance carriers will offer plans under the supervision of the Office of Personnel Management, the same entity that oversees health plans for Members of Congress. At least one plan must be non-profit, and the plans will be available nationwide. This will promote competition and choice.

  • Free choice vouchers. Workers who qualify for an affordability exemption to the individual responsibility policy but do not qualify for tax credits can take their employer contribution and join an exchange plan.

PDF


The president’s bill would grant the federal health and human services secretary new authority to review, and to block, premium increases by private insurers, potentially superseding state insurance regulators. The bill would create a new Health Insurance Rate Authority, comprised of health industry experts that would issue an annual report setting the parameters for reasonable rate increases based on conditions in the market.

link



You’ll buy your individual plan from a health insurance exchange where all plans will have to meet minimum standards for coverage and spend about 80 to 85 percent of premiums on health care on their customers, instead of on overhead, profits, and executive perks.

link



This year

Within the first year of signing health care reform, thousands of uninsured Americans with preexisting conditions would suddenly be able to purchase health insurance for the very first time in their lives.

This year, insurance companies will be banned forever from denying coverage to children with preexisting conditions.

This year, they will be banned from dropping your coverage when you get sick. And they will no longer able to arbitrarily and massively hike your premiums. Those practices will end.

If this reform becomes law, all the new insurance plans will be required to offer free preventive care to customers starting this year. Free checkups so we can catch preventable diseases.

Starting this year, there will be no more lifetime restricive annual limits on the amount of care you can receive from your insurance companies…

It would change fast: Insurance companies would finally be held accountable to the American people



And this is in progress:

Repealing the Antitrust Exemption for Health Insurance Companies

<...>

The President's support was made official in a statement of administration policy (SAP) sent to Congress as the House considers that legislation in the coming days. Here's the SAP (pdf):

STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY
H.R. 4626 — Health Insurance Industry Fair Competition Act
(Rep. Perriello, D-Virginia, and 65 cosponsors)

The Administration strongly supports House passage of H.R. 4626. The repeal of the antitrust exemption in the McCarran-Ferguson Act as it applies to the health insurance industry would give American families and businesses, big and small, more control over their own health care choices by promoting greater insurance competition. The repeal also will outlaw existing, anti-competitive health insurance practices like price fixing, bid rigging, and market allocation that drive up costs for all Americans. Health insurance reform should be built on a strong commitment to competition in all health care markets, including health insurance. This bill will benefit the American health care consumer by ensuring that competition has a prominent role in reforming health insurance markets throughout the Nation.


And this is still possible: 37 Senators supporting a public option via reconciliation

The current health care reform bill is the beginning, not the end of significant progress.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is where you're wrong:
you're creating a SYSTEM with this...regulations can be flouted or changed but the system remains.
you are CODIFYING for-profit private insurance as the arbiters of healthcare...that's not a basis for changing anything. That's cementing the status quo. Dress it up all you like but it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. "you're creating a SYSTEM with this"
Where does it say in the OP that this isn't a system? The fact is the OP explicitly states that this is a system, and the current effort is going to transform it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. no, you are codifying the current system
how can you possibly say that this is going to transform anything?
as I said, regulations are flouted and changed... the basic SYSTEM is what is WRONG. This does nothing to fix it and protects it from any real reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. "regulations are flouted and changed... "
Regulations also work. Do you deny that there is a need for regulation?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. how unsurprising that you twist what I said
into a claim that I'm against regulation.
I'm against propping up a corrupt and unsustianable SYSTEM with mere regulation when we could CHANGE THE SYSTEM.
This bill means that the system is cemented...we have the status quo forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. "I'm against propping up a corrupt and unsustianable SYSTEM "
More hyperbole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. So its not corrupt, or its not unsustainable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Or there is the other logic
that isn't flawed: It's not being propped up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. How is mandating the purchase of private for-profit insurance
not propping up the current system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Mandates have nothing to do with the propping up insurance companies..
A mandate is simply a mechanism for getting people to enter the system. Reform, as you said, creates a system, one that dramatically alters how the current system operates. The mandate takes effect in that system, not the current one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. you're not changing the system
the merits of the bill is another argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. "the merits of the bill is another argument."
Of course it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. okay, whatever that was supposed to mean...
you're not reforming anything.
You're propping up the current system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. So that assumes that it would continue to exist in a healthy state without the bill?
That contradicts any acknowledgment that its unsustainable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
45. "It's not being propped up."
Yeah, some sh*t will stand in a pile on it's own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
44. not hyperbole at all -- the truth hurts
Corrupt system. That pretty much describes the insurance industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course it is and we're
on the verge of getting it done..thanks for these links, PS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Most of the better components are Regulatory reform, as the OP outlined
And those reforms are roundly supported. The other components are roundly UNSUPPORTED and the reason that Democrats are even having to fight within their own Party. Why aren't they passing the components that the majority want them to pass without the components that are not wanted if that is what people WANT?

Why?

In my opinion that would be far superior than making a compromise that further supports a failed system and pushes out more fundamental reform 15 years into the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. It has some good regulations. I would prefer splitting the bill and passing the regulatory functions
and doing so immediately.

Why does everyone say we have to accept this severely corporate bill when there is a perfectly viable third option that would get far more support if it were simply offered?

Pass the regulatory components seperately. Revoke the monopoly right, put in place the regulatory aspects of the bill. Then continue the fight for the social program component in a second bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes it does not have to be this bill or nothing, but it sounds good to some people. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. If a person is starving and they are offered a few crumbs it is an
improvement, but that does not mean they will be able to eat next year.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. This is not crumbs, but I certainly expect
those willing to deny starving people food to mischaracterize these measures as "crumbs."

All or nothing kills.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. You said it, those who say it has to be THIS bill or nothing are standing
in the way of universal health care.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Exactly.
This is it. Reform dies with this bill because it cements our current system in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
35. Yup, I just watched the interview with Kucinich tonight...
it is embarrssing to be a Dem and watch them cave and push through this corporate friendly bill when they could have done so much better.

:(

We have nobody to blame but ourselves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
43. Crumbs for the working people
$BILLIONS FOR THE FU*KING SCUM SUCKING SH*THEADS RUNNING THE INSURANCE AND HEALTH CARE COMPANIES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
50. ""All or nothing kills. ""
"All or nothing kills."

this is like something a corporate republican would say, or a DLC corp-a-dem

there's only black or white, there is no gray.

And this bill is nothing for the working people, in fact it's worse than nothing. So the choice for the working people is nothing or worse than nothing. And the system is so corrupt they won't allow any gray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Exactly, this is a "short term" "fix, without considersation of the longer term
issues it will create.

Again, there is nothing stopping our Party from moving the regulatory reform into a seperate bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yes and the diversion is it has to be this or nothing! Something that
the Medicare for All advocates are constantly being told, I think they have it turned around.

:)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. "More Health Insurance Choices"
Ah, thats a good thing? You think smaller pools and 'competition' enhance insurance or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. "You think smaller pools and 'competition' enhance insurance or something?"
Do you think those are the only things in the bill that will be driving competition?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. So you really think market "competition" is the key?
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 01:09 AM by Oregone
Seems like you would be spending 90% of your time trying to get the anti-trust exemption driven home if so (which passed the House BTW)...


If competition is the key, its odd how some governments have but a single insurer allowed to operate, but still provide more efficient, affordable and egalitarian access to care than the US could dream of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Seriously,
this is the U.S. The place doesn't turn into some other country when people aren't looking.

Single payer isn't moving its way through Congress. (Remember them?)

Now, given where health care is in this country, this is a huge step forward, and no doubt more steps will follow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Ah, you mean the US, home of socialized banking insurance, Social Insurance, Medicare and ...
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 01:19 AM by Oregone
the fucking VA system (which is full blown socialized medicine)!

Yes, I forgot...a country far too backwards to consider socialized medical insurance for all (not just old people).

Look, its a step somewhere, Ill give you that. But just don't sit there and pretend that institutionalizing a private, for profit, multi-tier, non egalitarian system is a step toward true universal health care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Yes, the U.S. Are you pissed you had to leave?
Why not be happy where you are?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Had to leave?
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 01:27 AM by Oregone
Don't speak too much of things you don't understand.

Canada ranks amongst the top in intergenerational mobility (the American Dream) and they own top spots on the UN Human Development Index. They have a sane and functioning government, despite Harper, and make amazing contributions to the world in terms of peace keeping. Not only am I happier about how my tax money is used here, but Ive secured a bright future with a lot of opportunity for my children by moving (especially as a self-employed businessman). Im quite content with my decision and am enjoying my universal healthcare, and my wife is enjoying her one year of paid maternity leave too.

BTW, funny how you have to attempt to twist a policy debate into a personal jab when you are up against a wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. And yet you're on a discussion board ranting bitterly about the U.S.
Why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Ah, you missed my facetious tone a few posts back
That wasn't a rant at all about the US. It isn't some "backwards" backwoods country. All those institutions I named were socialistic. To pretend the US has to switch to some other country to enact sane policy is fallacious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #32
47. Why?
Because our health care is a piece of sh*t compared to the entire rest of the developed world?

and this bill just makes it worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
20. Would the new Insurance Rate Authority
have stopped the recent 39% premium increase by Anthem Blue Cross?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
28. if you have a preexisting condition or if the subsidies make insurance affordable for you, then....
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 01:29 AM by PHIMG
If you have a preexisting condition or if the subsidies make insurance affordable for you, then....yes this bill will help you personally.

so what this bill does is create a system of medical apartheid. you are gold if you have government insurance available to you: if you are POOR (with Medicaid) or OLD (with Medicare). You are the healthcare lucky duckies. If you are not old or poor then you are subject to the private mandate....the law forces you to pad the bottom lines of the private insurers...you are forced to buy insurance coverage from private insurers....who sell a defective product....they who sell the illusion of health care coverage.... but then do everything they can to deny healthcare to the people who pay them premiums. this industry is more immoral than the tobacco industry...it sells a product and then profits by not providing it.

private health insurance must go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
30. Let's hope at the last minute they fix this.
Otherwise, I will be so happy to crow, "I told you so", when it comes crashing down. Of course, I assume by then you will be long gone back to your job with THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
37. Better wait and see what comes before the president's desk before drawing any conclusions
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 01:33 AM by depakid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
39. One Word
BULLSHIT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Another word:
DENIAL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
42. Will there be any provision
prohibiting insurance industry employees from serving on the Insurance Rate Authority, or from taking jobs in the insurance industry after their service?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #42
46. they haven't figured out how to game that part of it yet.
At the moment that is.

However, the insurance industry is quite adept at looking at regulations and figuring ways *around* it, to their advantage. I'm sure they are hard at work in a back office, along with people who are setting up these *authorities*, figuring a way of making them *look* legit, while they figure a way of tipping the authority in their favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. My guess it will be staffed
and work like the SEC does with respect to the financial industry -- a huge revolving door, which will make real rate control impossible. What's to stop someone on the Authority approving a 39% rate increase, and then taking a high paying job with Anthem Blue Cross for example? Kinda like Billy Tauzin negotiating a job with Big Pharma while he was still a Congressman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. I agree with you wholeheartedly -- this whole fiasco is nothing more than job building for
future lobbyists who can game the regulations to squeeze the most out of unsuspecting citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
49. Why is there a need to control rates
through an Insurance Rate Authority? Isn't the exchange supposed to keep rates under control through competition?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
51. Under this reform
how many people will experience an increase in their healthcare costs (cost of insurance included), and how many will experience a decrease?

Under this HCR, how many people trying to save money for a down payment on a house will have to pay that money to an insurance company for health insurance they don't want or need?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Here



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC