Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I dont get Scott Brown (Steve Benen)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 02:24 PM
Original message
I dont get Scott Brown (Steve Benen)
Edited on Fri Mar-26-10 02:24 PM by Mass
Yesterday, Scott Brown informed us that the Democrats would stop at nothing:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x247137

Today, he decided that he was not ridiculous and over his head enough and decided to go to GMA to whine a little more.

I still dont get how people in our state could vote for this guy. It is not as if the local print media did not inform them the guy was light weight.

I dont care how lousy Coakley was.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_03/023071.php

I JUST DON'T GET SCOTT BROWN.... The poor guy is on TV all the time, but he just seems in over his head. (via Gerry Canavan)

Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., said today it's time to "collectively fix this bill" and that he's prepared to lead the charge to do just that.

"We're all in favor of the catastrophic care coverage and coverage for children," Brown told "Good Morning America." "But what about the backroom deals? What about all the bad things?"

What a garbled mess. "All" Republicans are "in favor" of some key provisions in the bill? That's very nice, except those same provisions would be scrapped if Republicans repeal the Affordable Care Act, as Brown's party is currently promising to do. Besides, if there was unanimous GOP support for those provisions, Brown's party kept this little detail carefully under wraps during the policy debate itself.

As for the "backroom deals," this weak tea is getting weaker all the time. For one thing, deal-making has been part of every major piece of legislation in American history. For another, the Senate approved a reconciliation package yesterday that removed the more notorious "backroom deals" from the package -- and Brown voted to leave the deals in.

"What about all the bad things?" That's profound, to be sure, but like everything else involving Scott Brown, it's noticeably short on substance and meaning.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's the male version of Sarah Palin, only a tiny bit less stupid.
Still stupid, but it's hard to be as dumb as Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That may be but he sure stepped into some Deep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Republicans sure do pick strange people as heroes."
Yup.

"I dont care how lousy Coakley was."

Stupid kneejerk voting. Same thing happened in NJ.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. The really ironic thing is that many people in my county voted
against Corzine because he canceled the property tax for those who made more than $75,000. Now, Christie has canceled it for everyone - but he is canceling the Corzine tax increase on those making more than $400,000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm looking forward to this bozo going down in 2012--first with Obama's coattails in MA
and then with a stronger Dem candidate against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Me too. 2012 cannot come too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The good news is he is up in 2012
and won't be getting a full six years. You can bring back a Dem next time, if there is someone reasonable running.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC