Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama’s FDA Inexplicably Fails to Advance New Emergency Contraception Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 10:50 AM
Original message
Obama’s FDA Inexplicably Fails to Advance New Emergency Contraception Rules

http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/03/25/down-again-obama-inexplicably-fails-advance-emergency-contraception-rules


Let Down Again: Obama’s FDA Inexplicably Fails to Advance New Emergency Contraception Rules


The first year of the Obama presidency is increasingly feeling like one of those maddening romantic relationships for many pro-choice supporters -- brimming with promise in the beginning, but during the actual courtship, rife with disappointments. This week is perhaps the most heartbreaking. It almost goes without saying that the president’s decision to cut a deal with anti-choice Democrats in the healthcare debate this past weekend and sign an executive order reiterating current law banning federal funding for abortion left many of us reeling. But this week also marks the one-year anniversary of a court ruling on emergency contraception that remains unenforced, and is a reminder of yet another key failing in reproductive health on the part of the Obama administration.

In March 2009, a federal judge delivered a blistering opinion to the Food and Drug Administration, condemning the agency’s Bush-era political appointees for ignoring the scientific evidence and restricting access to emergency contraception, a critical tool in preventing unwanted pregnancies and addressing the consequences of rape.

In its decision, the court ordered FDA to reconsider limits on access to emergency contraception. Yet no progress has apparently been made over the past year to remove the senseless and unjustified age limits, or to relocate emergency contraception where it belongs - out from behind pharmacy counters and next to the condoms and contraceptive jelly in a regular aisle.

Today, emergency contraception, also called the “morning after pill” and available under the trade names Plan B, One-Step, and Next Choice is available without a prescription, but only for women age 17 and older. Pharmacies and clinics must keep it behind the counter and anyone seeking to buy it must show government issued identification proving their age in order to buy it without a prescription.

-snip-

Judge Korman ordered the FDA to permit Plan B to be made available to 17-year-olds without a prescription immediately and to reconsider all of the remaining restrictions. Since the decision, the FDA has made EC available without a prescription to women 17 and older, an important but limited gain. But 12 months and multiple requests for information later, the FDA remains silent regarding its other unprecedented and unwarranted restrictions.

-snip-

We expect the FDA to safeguard our nation’s health by making decisions based on sound, well-documented science, not political or ideological imperatives. A federal court ruling has already demanded action -- and public health demands quick action as well. The FDA should stop dragging its heels and make emergency contraception available over the counter to all women without restriction. With backtracking on abortion now encoded in the law, access to emergency contraception looks now more important than ever.
-------------------------------

come on Obama and team, us women are watching you all. and you know what that means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like they're not sure whether
Edited on Sat Mar-27-10 10:55 AM by dipsydoodle
they're coming or going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Shocker. Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They appease the religious right because they believe in that crap
which explains the millions of dollars they are still giving to faith based abstinence program.

The government shouldn't be in the faith based system. Let someone else be in the stoning business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC