Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If the SC Shortlist is accurate, I hope Obama picks Diane Wood

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 12:21 PM
Original message
If the SC Shortlist is accurate, I hope Obama picks Diane Wood
The rumored shortlist for the Supreme Court seat left vacant by Steven's retirement comprises three names: Elena Kagan, Diane P. Wood, and Merrick Garland. (Some other names reportedly on the "long" list include Harvard Dean Martha Minow, former Georgia Supreme Court member Leah Ward Sears, and Jennifer Granholm.)

If the speculation on the top three is accurate, the seeming "frontrunner" is Kagan, who has already been confirmed as solicitor general and has a reputation as being fair to conservatives and relatively centrist. I'm not quite as down on her as a lot of liberals are - Glenn Greenwald, for example, argues that her positions on executive power are too lenient. While that gives me pause, I do think it's important to note that she is representing her client, the White House, and that it doesn't necessarily reflect the views she would espouse as a Supreme Court justice.

Still, my own hope is that Obama picks Diane Wood. Wood is, by all accounts, one of the premier Appeals Court judges in the country. She is an excellent writer, adept at building consensus, and has widespread acclaim from her conservative colleagues. She also appears to be the most liberal of the three short-listers. She would also add a little religious diversity and some academic diversity to the court, as a Protestant and as a graduate of U. Texas Law School.

The main concern about Wood seems to be her age - she would be 60 when seated. But I really don't see this as a major concern, because so long as she can serve for about 15-20 years she'll be able to retire when another Democrat is president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. As is the case with Hillary, I think we want someone younger. nt
Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 12:24 PM by Captain Hilts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Like I said, so long as she can serve 15-20 years...
... I really don't see why it's a problem. We just want someone to be able to serve through a Democratic administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it would be great if it was Anita Hill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't it ironic that being a Protestant adds diversity
Woods does sound really good - thanks for your insight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. What makes you think that there will be a Dem president in 15 to 20 years?
Your crystal ball must be better than mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. yeah, everyone knows the president will be Green Party by then!
and the GOP won't even exist.

wishful thinking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kagan and Garland
Are not inspiring choices. You would have to think Obama will want more of a legacy for himself than those two choices. Jesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. If he picks the rightwing go-to-girl Kagan he won't get my support
in 2012. Just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah, about the only name mentioned that could be worse than Kagan
would be ASS Sunstein. And no, that wasn't a typo. That guy's such a fucking neocon shit for brains he makes Lieberman look Liberal by comparison. I can't believe I've seen his name mentioned on this board as worthy of consideration. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC