Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Reich:The Only Way to Prevent Another Bailout of Wall Street is Cap Size of Wall Street Banks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:49 AM
Original message
Robert Reich:The Only Way to Prevent Another Bailout of Wall Street is Cap Size of Wall Street Banks
The Only Way to Prevent Another Bailout of Wall Street is to Cap the Size of Wall Street Banks

FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 2010

The best way for Senate Dems and the White House to respond to the Republican charge that the Dem plan for financial reform doesn’t go far enough to prevent another bailout is to call their bluff — and simultaneously do what’s necessary to avoid another bailout: Cap the size of big banks, as the UK is close to doing for its big banks.

The so-called “resolution” mechanism the Dems are pushing to wind down any big bank that gets into trouble is a step in the right direction. But it won’t work if two or more giant banks are endangered at the same time — which is likely to be the case when the next crisis occurs because every big bank uses whatever profitable financial ploys every other bank uses (as they did in the runup to the crash of 2008).

Furthermore, as I’ve noted before, as long as the big banks are allowed to be huge and become even bigger, their political clout in Washington will remain huge and become even bigger. And as long as they have this kind of clout, they’ll wangle a bailout from Washington the next time their bets get them into trouble regardless of any “resolution” authority.

So the Dem bill must cut the big banks down to size. The limit should be $100 billion in assets.

more...

http://robertreich.org/post/525962021/the-only-way-to-prevent-another-bailout-of-wall-street
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. SOCIALISMS!!!!!! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not enough. Restore New Deal banking reforms.
Bankers would endlessly lobby to push the size limit upward and to get exceptions. And size limits alone do nothing to control conflicts of interest between lending and investing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. And, then are are those who think 'too big to fail' is not the crux of the issue, i.e., Paul Krugman
It surely seem the banking system is rigged--due in no small part to the banks 'owning the place.' The place being Congress, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Krugman is right.
And if Congress does nothing to repair Phil Gramm's damage, we'll know they still own the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Restoring and updating New Deal laws is a piece but so is this
Companies simply cannot be allowed to be so large a piece of our economy that if any one or strategic few collapse that the undertow is so dramatic that the remaining economy cannot either functionally or in direct effect go on without crashing out.

Until percentage of GDP and percentage of critical function is seriously dealt with their can be no law that will truly prevent too big too fail. We can't have just a handful performing any essential functions, that stuff needs to be better spread throughout the entire sector or we actually end up reinforcing to big to fail as we make these entities defacto if not actually a piece of the government.

Its probably likely the Dodd's bill will have the end effect of preventing smaller banks from reaching a certain size and penetration but would leave the current criminals even more firmly entrenched.

Anyone that dares to speak of "half a loaf" on this issue will be allowing the next round of theft and poverty to get started.

We'll win the message war against any level of noise if we have a bill that would at least cause the corporate pirates to invent new ways of gaming the system.
If there is anything obvious then it should and must be dealt with now, not in some imagined point down the road since there will be mischief enough from the predator class under watchful eyes and tough rules without leaving them clear and apparent exceptions and loopholes to exploit.

We need to truly end to big to fail INCLUDING breaking up existing such institutions while spreading their power and critical function over much more of the sector.

We need sane capital requirements.

Strong and independent consumer protection.

Knock out the cross stealing and threat contamination by separating various functions as much as possible.

Transparent markets-across the board.

End blind derivatives or move them exclusively to the casinos, that's straight up gambling with zero thought to anything in the ballpark of investment. You can't even be a counter-balance or a hedge when you're just dealing with how big a bet you're willing to make.

Do anything possible to increase the return of actually creating value AKA work and actual investment and reduce the lure of speculation.

Adding in the certainly important things that haven't sprung to my mind. Necessity should drive this rather than the lame cop out of "politically feasible". We can't afford to seek half measures, they will lead to as much destruction as sitting around with our collective thumb up our collective ass, maybe more by creating a false sense of safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC