Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OKLA. MANDATES INVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES.... (state being sued)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:08 PM
Original message
OKLA. MANDATES INVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES.... (state being sued)
OKLA. MANDATES INVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES....

It's fairly common for policymakers who want to ban all abortions, but can't get away with that legally, to make it as difficult as possible for women to exercise their reproductive rights. But Oklahoma is taking this approach to truly outrageous levels.

The Oklahoma Legislature voted Tuesday to override the governor's vetoes of two abortion measures, one of which requires women to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a detailed description of the fetus before getting an abortion.

Though other states have passed similar measures requiring women to have ultrasounds, Oklahoma's law goes further, mandating that a doctor or technician set up the monitor so the woman can see it and describe the heart, limbs and organs of the fetus. No exceptions are made for rape and incest victims.

This really is remarkable. For all the overheated talk from the right of late about government interfering with medicine, patients' decisions, and doctors' treatments, conservatives in Oklahoma have now made this the law in their state.

<...>


Center for Reproductive Rights Files Lawsuit against Oklahoma’s Ultrasound Requirement

04.27.10 - (PRESS RELEASE) Today, the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a challenge against Oklahoma legislation which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless she first has an ultrasound, is shown the ultrasound image and listens to her doctor describe the image in detail. The lawsuit follows the Oklahoma Senate voting to override Governor Brad Henry’s veto of the legislation this afternoon.

“It is extremely disappointing that the Oklahoma legislature insists on passing a law that is so clearly unconstitutional and so detrimental to women in the state,” said Stephanie Toti, staff attorney in the U.S. Legal Program of the Center for Reproductive Rights. “The state has already spent the last two years defending this abortion restriction and several others—without success. Another round in the courts won’t change our strong constitutional claims against the law, it will only waste more of Oklahoma taxpayers’ time and money.”

The Center argues that the ultrasound requirement profoundly intrudes upon a patient’s privacy and is the most extreme ultrasound law in the country. The law forces a woman to hear information that she may not want to hear and that may not be relevant to her medical care. It also dangerously discounts her abilities to make healthy decisions about her own life by forcing her to hear information when she's objected. In addition, the statute interferes with the doctor-patient relationship—potentially damaging it—by compelling doctors to deliver unwanted speech.

“Politicians have no business making medical decisions,” said Toti. “When they do, it seriously undermines doctors’ ability to give patients the best medical care and does absolutely nothing to improve the health of patients.”

Last year, an Oklahoma state court struck down the ultrasound provision, among other abortion restrictions, as part of an omnibus bill in a single-subject challenge.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. KR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. The RWers want it both ways: They claim they want ALL pregnant women to REMAIN pregnant
and have a baby, yet they also are angry at women who "have babies so they can live off the system" or "illegals" who have babies so they can stay here in the U.S. Then they claim they want government out of their business but want to force them to remain pregnant no matter why the women feel they want/need an abortion. Consistency is NOT their strong suit. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's not all...
The legislature voted to override the governor's veto on a second bill that makes it impossible for a woman to sue her doctor if he gives her the wrong information regarding her pregnancy ie: in the case of a fetus w/deformities, a woman cannot sue for wrongful birth to receive damages.
This allows a doctor to impose his will/beliefs upon a woman by not giving her all the information about her pregnancy. WTF?

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gee, what happened to "keep the government out of my doctor's office!!"
It's as bad -- in a different way -- as the immigration bill in Arizona. Teabaggers and wingnuts love government intrusion as long as they're dictating the intrusion.

If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

George W. Bush

December 18, 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC