Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I admit to being concerned about Kagan's hires at Harvard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 08:12 PM
Original message
I admit to being concerned about Kagan's hires at Harvard
The conservatives, no problem provided they are competent. The lack of diversity, big problem. 28 of 29 were white with one Asian. No blacks, no Hispanics, no Native Americans. 23 of the 29 were men. Honestly, this is a bit disturbing. I can't give an exact number of people of color I think she should have hired but it is more than 0. I don't think this record disqualifiers her but I would like some explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Valid concern
Nothing to discuss about it IMO, it's just a fact to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windy_city88 Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any idea how many people of color applied for the open positions?
And if there were was their race the reason why they were not hired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That is what Affirmative Action is for
to help places like Harvard get better representation on their faculties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windy_city88 Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. How confident are you that Kagen had a racially diverse pool to choose from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. then she needed to find one if she didn't
that is the point of affirmative action. You actively search for a more diverse pool. Certainly on women she had to have had a more diverse pool than that which she chose. Women made up over 40% of law degrees in the 1980's so they would have made up about the same number of qualified candidates for her to choose from. I will admit that it would have been likely harder to find alot of qualifed people of color but certainly some shouldn't have been that hard to find. Yale managed to hire as many people of color as she did despite hiring a third as many people and they hired more women than she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Actually, quite confident- considering the faculty that I've seen at other institutions
Should be interesting to see the reaction among the racist crowd- Jeff Sessions being the one to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. yeah, but the black dude who picked her probably took it into consideration...
.... I'm not naive enough to think that the President knows EVERYTHING, but when it comes to matters of ethnic diversity, I trust his judgment. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. this would be the same President who couldn't find one single, solitary, openly gay person to serve
in his cabinet. Just saying. I will give you that he may well have gotten a decent explanation from her in that regard. I hope it gets shared with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. lol ... Which is why I SPECIFICALLY said, "ethnic"....
Edited on Sun May-09-10 09:26 PM by Clio the Leo
.... I made a POINT of saying ETHNIC diversity since was what you were addressing. ;)

Dont MAKE me get ethnic on you! :p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And he's known her since 1991....
.... He nominated her to the DC circuit court in 1999. I doubt she had to give him an explanation, he knows her character. It's not like he just read about her in the last few years. (which one would normally presume)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, maybe Br'er Graham & Br'er Sessions will cotton to her.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC