Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Specter's Rough Morning - Down by five and now he has to reconcile his "NO" vote on Kagan.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:09 AM
Original message
Specter's Rough Morning - Down by five and now he has to reconcile his "NO" vote on Kagan.
Specter's Rough Morning

By CQ-Roll Call Staff | May 10, 2010 8:05 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Sen. Arlen Specter woke up today to two political headaches. First, the daily tracking poll in his primary -- which is now just a week and a day away -- finds Rep. Joe Sestak with all the upward momentum, though the Democratic nomination could still go either way.

Sestak was up by 5 points in the Muhlenberg College-Allentown Morning Call tracking poll, which has a 5-point margin of error. Of Democratic voters sampled, 11 percent were still undecided.

Second, there's what has to be the uncomfortable news that a nominee Specter voted against last year while he was still a Republican is going to be President Obama's next Supreme Court nominee.

It would be a pretty big slap to refuse to support the high court nominee of your own party's president, especially when that president is trying to help you hang on to your job. But how could Specter argue that someone he found unfit to argue cases before the Supreme Court is fit to rule on arguments in cases before the Supreme Court?

Take heart, senator, the choice of Elena Kagan isn't official until the White House says it is.

In the meantime, TPM's Christina Bellantoni links to Specter's own words from when Kagan last stood for confirmation, and Fox News has a good primer on Kagan.

http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2010/05/so-endangered-democrats-how-wi.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=eye-on-2010

FWIW, (R)asmussen also has Sestak up by five. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/pennsylvania/2010_senate_election/election_2010_pennsylvania_democratic_primary_for_senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:14 AM
Original message
Arlen is in a room with 148 disparate and unrelated objects and has
been enjoined to combine them to make a mechanical pelican.

Understandably, he has no idea how to do this.

He has to have it done by the 18th or Sestak will win.

Woe is Arlen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why did he vote against her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe he read all the shit that has been posted about her on DU?
I imagine many DUers are going to like Specter a lot more now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Remember, he was a Republican at the time.
Specter's always been a political chameleon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. He was a Rethug and trying to stay that way but the party really didn't want him.
Edited on Mon May-10-10 09:20 AM by Jennicut
So he switched sides. I really don't dislike Specter, he is a political animal for sure and a chameleon. But he always was a moderate Rethug and they have no room for those types anymore. Where are they supposed to go? Independent or Dem? Reminds me of Crist. Better to have more moderate Rethugs then the ultra conservative teabaggers.

However, I prefer Stestak and if he wins the primary then that is good for us. I have been closely watching this race to see who has a better shot at beating Toomey. I think Stestak is picking up a lot of good momentum right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC