Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(R)asmussen CT-SEN Poll: Blumenthal 56, McMahon 33.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:03 AM
Original message
(R)asmussen CT-SEN Poll: Blumenthal 56, McMahon 33.
Democrat Richard Blumenthal apparently has weathered charges that he exaggerated his military service in Vietnam for years and is running as strongly as ever against both his Republican challengers in Connecticut’s race for the U.S. Senate.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Connecticut finds Blumenthal with 56% support versus 33% for Linda McMahon, the officially endorsed GOP candidate. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and seven percent (7%) are undecided. McMahon has come under criticism recently as people have focused on her role in World Wresting Entertainment, a corporation that one conservative pundit compares to the Gulf oil spill as “a relentless gusher of pollution."

Blumenthal, the state’s longtime attorney general, earns 55% of the vote in a match-up with Wall Street investment banker Peter Schiff, who hopes to collect enough signatures by Tuesday to force McMahon into an August 10 primary contest. Given that match-up, three percent (3%) like another candidate, and nine percent (9%) are undecided.

With both Republicans earning roughly the same support, the new findings suggest that the race continues to be largely about Blumenthal.

The current figures put the race back where it has been for most of the year, a likely Democratic victory in a challenging year for the Democratic Party. However, the numbers also reflect a big change in the race from the days immediately following a New York Times report suggesting that Blumenthal had exaggerated his military record. The Times is an influential publication among Democrats, and, in the heat of the moment, their story caused some Democrats to have doubts about Blumenthal.

Just after that story broke, Blumenthal held a very narrow 48% to 45% lead over McMahon.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/election_2010_connecticut_senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fugop Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey GOP and talking heads:
In the words of Nelson Muntz: HA-ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lordcommander Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Tweety should STFU now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. What's tweety bellowing about?
Kirk and brewer, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. I told a lot of people on DU that he would survive this.
Blumenthal is well liked here in CT and McMahon is not. Simple as that. No need to ever replace him...we didn't have anyone here that would have been as good anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And, Blumenthal's statements seem not bad at all
at hearing about Mark Kirk and Jan Brewer. Don't know if the corporatemedia is playing their lies like they did Blumenthal's though(if his was a lie?)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Not as much attention, not nearly. Double standard once again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Figured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rasmussen is trying to cover his (r)ass.
Just after that story broke, Blumenthal held a very narrow 48% to 45% lead over McMahon.


Sure he did, buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That poll now has to be seen as
utter crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. This lowers Rasmussen's credibility even further
Blumenthal goes up 8% and McMahon drops 12%, those huge shifts seem more like Rasmussen was trying to backtrack and maintain credibility, but it only made him look more flaky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Three words that are going to blow the race open:
McMahon sex tape

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC