Whoever at the WH that said that Unions "wasted" $10 million can go fuck themselves

Seriously.

The WASTE WAS THE White House/DNC/DLC and whoever else that backed a REPUBLICAN in the Democratic primary - you know the person who actively railed against the White House agenda.

Jesus, she's going to lose anyway.

What the fuck is wrong with these people???

Like putting a pro-union administration into the White House sometime.

Waaaay to be the uniter! :sarcasm:

Sounds like something Rahm would say.

The DC crowd lives an insular life filled with perks and power, and they tend to stick up for each other to the very end as a defense mechanism against the outside world discovering how well off they really are.

The political labels (D, R) are just for the benefit of the rubes outside of their clique, they really operate as a singular club away from the glare of the spotlight.

not unlike cockroaches.

And they scatter when you shine a light on them.

go figure.

-p

Is a gossipy coward. I'd like to see them same that without anonymity.

DU is happy to oblige.

Plausible denial is all you got because the track record of standing up against big money on the behalf of workers and the poor is soooooooo strong.

I think working people, those that want to look after the weakest among us, the environmentalists, and those who wish to preserve and advance civil liberties are "fucking retarded" for playing along.

Gibbs basically echoed the sentiment. And he confirmed it came from the White House. No name though.

I can get wound up about plenty of things, but statements from anonymous people posted on Politico don't do it for me. If you want to get wound up, have at it. Maybe it was said, maybe not. Maybe it was said by Rahm. Maybe not. I don't know so I don't care.

got another think comin' (as my Mother used to say).

The $10 million should have been spent on candidates that have a chance to win in Novemeber. Not on lost causes.

The WH is suggesting that Lincoln is a good candidate and given that she is the incumbent who has been nothing but a thorn against major core Democratic values, that’s asinine to begin with. Add to that, the idiotic claim that the unions were “wasting” money… well the money would not have been necessary if she stepped aside and the establishment backed a Democrat. I am not seeking party purity and politics involves pragmatic solutions and certainly a conservative state means not getting everything you want from anyone who represents it – however, believing in – or at least not bashing CORE Democratic beliefs is not acceptable.

The point is that if money was “wasted” it’s the establishment’s fault. Period.

It's just that fucking simple.

"New Democrats" act like Republicans, only worse.

Yeah, I guess it kinda fits.

It's also that simple.

In other words, it's a typical Democratic White House.

a strong Dem coalition of voters.

Dig around on MediaMatters. it will curl your hair

They are funded by a bunch of Right Wingers - see the wikipedia entry on them.

The like to stir up shit.

Time and time again I've seen DU explode over a Politico article, and then the next day we figure out the article was spin and bullshit.

And Ben Smith has been a pot-stirring little shit from the moment he started working for that rag.

And would have blown more given the guy had no chance in the general.

And how much more money will they "blow" on her in the general?

If it's wastage when done by the unions, then it's wastage when done by the Democratic Party as well. They seem to be saying that a loss means you should not have tried in the first place.

Of course what they are really saying is, How dare you raise money for another candidate in the primary? Who the hell do you think you are? And they are using the fact that Halter lost as a moment to say "neener neener neener". Classy.

In any case, they can't use the argument that the money was wasted, without having the same argument legitimately turned back on themselves, given that Lincoln looks to have a hard time of it in the general. But we'll see -- maybe she will pull it off.

It's wastage when the candidate loses.

That's how it works.

...so it's a little disingenuous to say the day after that they threw their money away. Hindsight being 20/20 and all that...

In any case, it would seem they are trying to deliver the message that the union was wrong to use their $$ to back a candidate who is more pro-union than Lincoln. While some of us think that's exactly what primaries are for, to widen the field and provide voters with real choices.

So yes, Halter lost. But not by much. And given that Lincoln is an incumbent, she got slapped, just not hard enough.

Here's hoping the unions keep pushing.

Losing is a waste.

that didn't involve somebody losing a shit load of money.

It's an all or nothing game.

It was worth $10 Million to have the "Centrist" Democratic Party Leadership exposed on video spending party money, face time, and their diminishing credibility on a shamelessly Anti-LABOR/Anti-Working Class/Anti-Public Option candidate.

There can be no more phony claims that the Democratic Party Leadership is Pro-Working Class.
Their Anti-LABOR loyalty to Corporate Cash is NOW etched in stone and preserved on videotape.


What are the Pro-LABOR Democrats going to do?
Vote for a Republican?
Hahahahahahahahahaha!

exactly their attitude on not only labor, but health care, the wars, and just about everything they've touched so far. Depressing.

If she's going to lose, he would have, too.

"If someone at the WH that said that Unions "wasted" $10 million they can go fuck themselves"

....

President Obama is MUCH too bright to keep this weasel around much longer.

and she voted for Wall Street bailout while opposing Main Street bailout. The American worker is tired of voting for people that won't support the interests of the workers.

I don't vote for people because they're folksy or pretty or dress well or because I'm told I have no choice because the other guy's worse even though I can see they're pushing the same policies. I vote for people because they support the same principles and issues I support and want to move the country in the direction I want the country to move.

My simliar post was deleted, so I'll back yours!

But he did confirm that the source was from the White House. And he managed to basically agree with the sentiment in the process.

Especially when you consider neither has a chance to win the General Election

I think that whether or not that money might have been better spent in the fall on closer elections between somebody -- between people who cared about an agenda that benefited working families and those that didn't, that money might come in more handy then.

rear ends of the anti-union blue dogs.