Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Public Policy Polling (PPP) on why the "enthusiasm gap" may not be enough for the GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:32 PM
Original message
Public Policy Polling (PPP) on why the "enthusiasm gap" may not be enough for the GOP
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 03:43 PM by WI_DEM
Our last national poll finds the same thing every other poll does. Very excited voters favor Republicans on the generic Congressional ballot 50-38. But Democrats lead 53-35 with somewhat excited voters and 45-27 with not very excited voters, giving them an overall 43-41 lead.

So which number matters more- the overall one or the one among highly enthused voters? Let's look at a few of the races we've already had this cycle:

-In the special House election in Pennsylvania last month our polling found Republican Tim Burns up 60-38 with very excited voters. He trailed 50-46 with somewhat excited voters and 53-37 with not very excited voters. Burns lost the election because the Democrats, excited or not, still turned out.

-In the Massachusetts Senate race Scott Brown led 59-40 with very excited voters, trailed 60-35 with somewhat excited ones, and trailed 61-31 with not very excited ones. He won but those folks who said they weren't very excited still showed up and kept his margin of victory to 5 points.

-In the New Jersey Governor's race Chris Christie lead 60-34 on our final poll with very excited voters, trailed 44-42 with somewhat excited ones, and tied at 39 with not very excited ones. Like Brown he won, but it was only by 4 points and nowhere close to the 26 point lead he showed with very excited voters.

http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2010/06/thoughts-on-enthusiasm-gap.html

p.s.
furthermore I'm convinced democrats could have won the MA special Senate election had we had a fully engaged nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Last Primary Elections--we were fed--Democrats are not enthusiastic
The Republicans will have a better turn out the vote result.

GUESS WHAT: In real numbers and real bodies more Democrats
than Republicans got themselves to the polls and voted.

Even in that very exciting "Rand Paul Race" in Kentucky
yes, more Democrats got to polls to vote than did Republicans.

Rachel Maddow did a run down on this the evening of Super Tuesday
Primary June *.

Even if they are not excited, I am glad the Dems are getting
to the polls. Gosh, if we can stir up some excitement we
might have landslides, while the MSM navel-gaze and predict
the Democrats are goners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not being ethusiastic doesn't equal not voting
There isn't always excitement about elections, but lots of Democratic voters know the importance of the election and will turn out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Once a voter gets to the polls to vote, it does not matter how excited he is
His vote counts the same as the excited person. The trick is to get the passive person to vote in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC