Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Stanley McChrystal never really had a chance"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 04:54 PM
Original message
"Stanley McChrystal never really had a chance"
President Barack Obama and top aides immediately seized on the idea of firing the insubordinate and loose-lipped Afghanistan commander minutes after Obama scanned the first few lines of a Rolling Stone article in the White House Monday night.


The decision to get rid of McChrystal was not contingent on Gen. David Petraeus agreeing to replace him, administration officials said Wednesday. But the CENTCOM commander’s quick decision to accept the new job — technically a demotion relocating Petraeus from Tampa to Kabul — made Obama’s job a lot easier.


It culminated in the 30-minute Oval Office session with Obama Wednesday – when, technically, it was McChrystal who offered his resignation. Obama accepted.


McChrystal’s break-neck fall from grace began Monday evening when assistant White House press secretary Tommy Vietor was emailed an advance PDF copy of “The Runaway General,” which he quickly printed out for press secretary Robert Gibbs.


An irate Gibbs tracked down the president in the basement of the executive residence to deliver the news that his maverick Afghanistan commander and his team had trashed the White House and U.S. allies in vulgar, vivid terms.


read the first few paragraphs and we decided to go to the Oval Office and get a bigger group together…The possibility came up,” said a senior administration official of that first meeting, which included Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, senior adviser David Axelrod and Gibbs, among others.


The passage that really torqued the president, advisers say, was McChrystal’s reported contempt for U.S. allies in Afghanistan – especially the French – illustrated in the story by McChrystal’s reluctance to meet a senior official in Paris, a dinner appointment one McChrystal aide called “gay.”


Obama, the administration official said, was astounded and alarmed by “the effect it would have on the allies” in Afghanistan, who have been asked to shed blood and “who will be asked to do more” if the U.S. is to begin pulling out by July 2011.


“This was not about the president being angry about the things that were said about himself,” added the aide, who says that Obama never even discussed McCrystal’s reported criticism of the president as detached and intimidated during his meetings with the brass.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38937.html#ixzz0riQk0dSU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. +1
This is what I have thought about the President regarding this situation since it broke. IT was NEVER about him.

For people like me, it was. That is why I am unfit for office, and Barack Obama is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's a uniquely evolved human being
That's why so many people can't understand him, or just hates him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Way more evolved then me. I would have called up old Stan and trashed talked him into
oblivion. But then I am not as mature as Obama is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The fact that he didn't fire him after his initial act of insubordination made that pretty clear IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tapping Petraeus never crossed my mind. So all in all Obama is far more intelligent than me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. "detached and intimidated"?
is that even possible?

i mean, how can you be intimidated if you're detached?

so he was describing the president as, what, so gripped with fear that he wasn't even paying attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That struck me too. This is a guy who just wanted to attack Obama without even knowing the meaning
of the garbage coming out of his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
volvoblue Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. I would not put much faith in Politico
fact is the man made a stupid decision to allow a reporter in with the crew while they drank and got loose.
running the mouth.
it frankly left no other course because it became public and damaging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC