Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The tick-tock: How President Obama took command of the McChrystal situation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 10:10 AM
Original message
The tick-tock: How President Obama took command of the McChrystal situation
By MIKE ALLEN | 6/24/10

Vice President Joe Biden was the first top administration official to know about the Rolling Stone article.

He was flying back from Chicago after a campaign event when Gen. Stanley McChrystal called him on Air Force 2 around 5:30 p.m. to apologize for comments in the article. The vice president had no idea what he was talking about, so the call was brief, and Biden asked his aides to get a copy of the story.

Shortly before, Tommy Vietor, the assistant White House press secretary who handles national-security issues, had been e-mailed a PDF of the article by a colleague in the U.S. government. Vietor forwarded the PDF to a few officials who tried in vain to read the tiny type on their BlackBerries. So Vietor printed out a bunch of copies for the national-security inner circle. He walked one into Robert Gibbs’ office and handed him a copy, with key passages marked.

It would be a long night: Aides would still be in the West Wing at 10:30 p.m. and later. President Obama had already gone to the Residence on the second floor of the White House, and Gibbs walked a copy over around 8 p.m. Within an hour, top aides were talking about firing McChrystal. A senior administration official recalled yesterday during a briefing for reporters: “He read the first few paragraphs and decided that we should go to the Oval Office and get a bigger group of people. … He was angry.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38962.html

Interesting article about the sequence of events that culminated with McChrystal's firing.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent article, thanks.
I originally thought Obama might turn the other cheek. I was relieved by how strong and decisive he was at the announcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're welcome.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. This tricky situation was handled superbly, IMO.
The minute I saw Petraeus come out with Obama I knew it was going to be OK. Obama's words were tone perfect. He came across as serious and a clear thinker. McChrystal comes across as a nut case. He got his face to face with the President, got his ass fired, and was out the door and out of public sight. The Obama team kept a tight lid on the situation and looked sane and calm.

All in all a terrific performance of a job well done under lots of pressure. Bravo, Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes it was.
Obama didn't have much of a choice. McChrystal and his aides were out of line and should have known better than to give an interview to Rolling Stones.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Some of these generals get too big for their britches.
And the country has to re-learn the lesson of civilian control of the military all over again. It's too bad, but I just guess it's always a possibility that a general will start thinking he knows better than the president...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akbacchus_BC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks for this positive news. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You're welcome.
It IS a positive article, but the unrec'ing crew is still going after it.

Unbelievable........

:eyes:


:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC