Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH: On a Path to Ending Homelessness

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:24 PM
Original message
WH: On a Path to Ending Homelessness

On a Path to Ending Homelessness

Posted by Melody Barnes

Someone once told me -- in your head it's a dream, but on paper it's a plan. As a nation, we’ve talked about addressing the issue of homelessness, and now we have a plan. Over the last year, the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH), consisting of 19 federal agencies and chaired by Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Shaun Donovan, drafted the nation’s first comprehensive strategic plan to prevent and end homelessness.

The impetus for such a plan was simple. In the United States, no one should spend a single night without a place to call home. Yet, 634,000 people, including 107,000 veterans, experience homelessness on any given night. The families and individuals that experience homelessness and the advocates that work so hard on this issue know that we need to act with a renewed sense of urgency.

Yesterday, the lead Cabinet secretaries from USICH – Secretary Donovan, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary Eric Shinseki – joined USICH Director Barbara Poppe to unveil and submit Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness to the President and Congress.

The plan sets ambitious but measurable goals: (1) end chronic homelessness in five years; (2) prevent and end homelessness among veterans in five years; (3) prevent and end homelessness for families, youth, and children within a decade; and (4) put us on a path to ending all types of homelessness.

The plan builds on existing interagency partnerships and evidence-based models that are working at the local level. It will focus the resources and efforts of federal agencies to offer a variety of comprehensive solutions. For example, the partnership between HUD, HHS, and Education will provide homeless families with not only a home, but the wrap-around services they need to remain off the streets.

This is doable but it requires all of us to work together - Congress, federal agencies, state and local officials, faith-based and community organizations, and business and philanthropic leaders across our country.

We applaud the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness for their tireless efforts to put on paper what we know is possible. Preventing and ending homelessness will positively impact the lives of individuals and families, veterans, children and youth, those who are chronically ill, those suffering from domestic violence, and those combating discrimination of all sorts.

We look forward to working with dedicated state and local leaders to open doors and opportunities for men, women, and children all across the country.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unachievable
The plan sets ambitious but measurable goals: (1) end chronic homelessness in five years; (2) prevent and end homelessness among veterans in five years; (3) prevent and end homelessness for families, youth, and children within a decade; and (4) put us on a path to ending all types of homelessness.

1) chronic is the least solvable. There are large numbers of people who resist assistance.

2) This is the closest. Especially the "prevent" part. You'll never get to zero, but I'd bet you could get close.

3) This is also approachable. I'll believe it when I see it, and no I don't expect zero, but I'd bet they ultimately define "homeless" in terms of some significant number of days to help make it more achievable.

4) "On a path". Whatever that means. If they make any significant dent in the first three, they'll have accomplished as much of this one as I'd ever expect could be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Good thing the administration is not pessimistic. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Just standard wording
They don't ever have to achieve those goals, it's just a place holder so planning of scale can occur. Anyone "in the business" knows there will always be homeless people. There will always be chronic homelessness. Doesn't mean you shouldn't try to manage it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "They don't ever have to achieve those goals "
What they don't have to do is not try. Still, I'm not understanding your objection.

"Anyone "in the business" knows there will always be homeless people."

So that's a reason not to try to end it?

Maybe you need to heed the words of those who have been fighting for this for a long time:

“We welcome this first-ever, comprehensive federal commitment to end homelessness. The plan has a timeframe and clear, measurable national goals; these will help to drive an organized and committed federal response,” said Nan Roman, President of the National Alliance to End Homelessness.

<...>

What we need now is action,” said Roman. “Communities that are able to show real progress are those that have not only created a plan, but harnessed the political will and public support necessary to commit real resources to implementation. These communities now have a federal partner to stand alongside local stakeholders in the effort to prevent and end homelessness. Together, we can all turn this plan into real action.”

<...>







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Well, I don't think I'm really disagreeing
If you go back and read what I wrote, I indicated that trying and achieving singificant gains was what was important. This isn't the first time we've seen these kinds of efforts. I've lived through several versions. No one is going to "end homelessness". We can do alot to address the symptoms and causes. More power to 'em, but they'll never end homelessness. The only way to do that is to redefine it into something achievable like homeless for more than X consecutive days or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama admin, lets deal with DOMA then worry about homelessness. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Is this supposed to be a compassionate response? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. No, I'm compassionate.
Edited on Thu Jun-24-10 01:59 PM by vaberella
Sadly, I'm looking at low hanging fruit in getting things done. We have a Congress that has systematically thrown out a vote to expand unemployment. I respect the push for this, I like it. However, with the Congress we have I'm a bit disenchanted. Not that DOMA might fair any better.

Apologies for appearing cold-hearted. It wasn't my intention but I think I've had my fill of Congress and the way they undermine the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Whether sincere or snark, this comment is unhelpful.
There is no reason to suggest that either worthy goal must come at the expense of the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I don't want to suggest that...but Congress so far has made that clear and hence my statement.
This is in regards to the continuous push back against increasing unemployment timeline which leads to more homelessness if not checked for some people considering the economical environment. I'm sorry if my statement seems a snarky but I'm disenchanted with Congress and I don't think this will go through when something like unemployment or even DOMA repeal can't. I hope this is understood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. ? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Post 8 or 11.
My response is fairly in lieu of this thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x353720

This would be the third or 4th time measures were voted on and defeated to bring down the rate poverty. My response is basically in targeting something that might be a bit more feasible because obviously we have a Congress that doesn't mind letting people starve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. how about getting unemployment benefits to those who are teetering on homelessness?
I'm sure that's FAR more *do-able* and then those folks can stay in the places they are now. In reality-land. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. That and job creation would help immensely with homelessness
but (I say this sadly) that's not something I expect to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. Laudable goals and I commend him for trying, but the timetable strikes me as totally unrealistic.
With two wars sucking billions of dollars out the economy I don't see where the money is going to come from to do even half of the things needed to achieve these goals. Here in Mass yesterday they just cut the budget on low income needs (and damn near everything else in the State). There's simply no money there. And there will need to be all kinds of safety nets provided that will need funding.

Plus, the problems facing us on this front are so incredibly complex that it's also an added barrier to reaching these goals. He will have to address drug and alcohol use, abuse, neglect, and the root causes of poverty (to scratch just the surface). Because without addressing all those issues, and more, it's a losing battle. And he's going to have to do all this while the Repubs try to undercut every single move he'll make on it. This is the uphill battle to end all uphill battles in our society.

I don't want to sound like a Debbie Downer here, because I truly am thrilled that he's even talking about this issue. I just think it's so highly complex that he's overreaching here per the timetable they're setting. These problems can be fixed if we have the will and the funding, but I think we're looking at a far longer timetable (and that's assuming everything goes smoothly, a laughable expectation in D.C.). I'll be thrilled if he can even get the ball rolling in the right direction on a fraction of the problems facing the homeless, and those close to being homeless. My father was homeless for a stretch, I was homeless for a stretch, and my town currently has a huge homeless problem facing us, and it's getting worse, not better. Trust me, I wish Obama all the luck in the world on this one.

K&R



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is it leftwing or rightwing trolls unreccing this?
Same shit, different pile of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC