Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Administration Sided With Scott Brown On Wall Street Bill Loophole

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 11:17 AM
Original message
Obama Administration Sided With Scott Brown On Wall Street Bill Loophole
As the final Wall Street negotiations came to a close last week, the Obama administration quietly sided with Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) against most Democrats in support of a loophole in one of the key provisions of the financial reform bill.

Several Democratic Hill aides tell TPMDC that the Treasury Department, which wielded tremendous influence over the shape of the legislation, changed its position on the Volcker rule during the final deliberations, endorsing an exemption that will allow banks to invest in outside hedge funds.

"Treasury's official position went from opposed to to supportive," one aide says. "They may have overshot Brown's desires by a bit."

The variant of the Volcker rule in the Wall Street reform bill, authored by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR), is meant to limit the extent to which federally insured financial firms can make risky bets with their profits.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/obama-administration-sided-with-brown-o.php?ref=fpb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who knew they were going to negotiate to get votes?
"Treasury's official position went from opposed to to supportive."

Maybe Feingold should have traded his opposition to preserve Volcker.

Democratic leaders and the White House have long considered Brown the linchpin of financial reform. Because of Feingold's and Cantwell's opposition, Democrats had to rely on a small handful of Republicans to push the bill over the finish line. Brown was believed to be the 60th, filibuster-breaking vote, and ultimately won his exemption.

Opinions vary as to whether top Democrats on the Hill and in the White House did enough to persuade Feingold and Cantwell to change their votes, which would have robbed Brown of much, if not all of his leverage. Some place the blame for the outcome at Feingold and Cantwell's feet: Brown wouldn't have won his loophole if one or both of them had been willing to flip their votes in exchange for a more restrictive Volcker rule. Others argue that the administration always places too much faith in moderate Republicans and simply sought to avoid antagonizing Brown, who will likely be a swing vote on future legislation.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Unfortunately "negotiating" for this administration
means watering down bills, giving the Republicans what they want, getting nothing in return, then have the Republicans not vote for it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That maybe the case, but when Democrats aren't going to vote for legislation
that makes significant progress, things slip through to get votes.

Like I said, did anyone expect the administration to scrap the entire bill over a small concession? Doing nothing is not an option.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC