is why they won't drop the case. What did Seigelman do to keep this injustice going? Because he defeated a conservanazi for the Alabama governorship? Or is it because he's a Democrat? Why can't the Department of Injustice investigate and see what wrongdoing that was going on? Or perhaps, since that would be a major conflict of interest, appoint a special prosecutor to see what laws were broken in this attack on Siegleman and his incarceration immediately after his conviction?
There are a lot of questions that needs to be answered and I think the conservanazis in Alabama have a lot of crimes to hide. :think:
He was the guy who set the National League single season home run record, then got busted for steroid use. The "I don't want to talk about the past" thing was something he said when Congress subpoenaed him to testify about steroid use in professional sports.
6. The Justice Department could still announce that it will not argue the case in the lower court.
It's not as if Holder has a constitutional or even statutory obligation to try to keep the case alive. Holder KNOWS the charges against Siegelman never had merit, and he knows that Democrats have nothing to lose from Rove being discredited.
8. At this point the question is mute. The lower court is required to take action
the AG's office would then have an opportunity to respond, which depending on the lower court's decision might be mute. At this point there is no more arguing before the lower court until the lower court has reviewed its decision in light of the SC ruling.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.