Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mike Pence (Sleazy-IN) Explains Why America Can Afford Tax Cuts For The Rich But Not Jobless Aid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 11:06 AM
Original message
Mike Pence (Sleazy-IN) Explains Why America Can Afford Tax Cuts For The Rich But Not Jobless Aid
Mike Pence Explains Why America Can Afford Tax Cuts For The Rich But Not Jobless Aid
First Posted: 07-18-10 11:58 AM | Updated: 07-18-10 11:58 AM

The unsavory task of explaining why America apparently can't afford to help the unemployed but can afford tax cuts for the rich fell to Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) on Sunday.

"Republicans, me included, have supported numerous extensions of unemployment benefits and we're anxious to do so again," the Indiana Republican told interviewer Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday." "The deficit this year is a trillion dollars for the second year in a row ... The American people have had it with runaway federal spending, deficits and debt, and they want to see men and women in Washington, D.C. make the hard choices."

Polls released last week showed that despite anxiety about spending, registered voters actually favor helping the unemployed even if it adds to the deficit.

Nevertheless, extended unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless lapsed at the beginning of June because Republicans in the Senate, joined by Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson, insisted that the $33 billion cost of reauthorizing the benefits not be added to the deficit (though some deficit hawks actually don't consider stiffing the jobless a smart way to reduce the deficit to begin with). Fox's Wallace said he understood the Republicans' argument that the unemployment benefits be "paid for" -- but why not also "pay for" a reauthorization of the tax cuts, which will cost $678 billion?

"The reality is that as you study -- when President Kennedy cut marginal tax rates, when Ronald Reagan cut marginal tax rates, when President Bush imposed those tax cuts, they actually generated economic growth, they expand the economy, they expand tax revenue," Pence said. "The point is we've got to get this economy moving again and we can't go back to the tax-and-spend policies of the Democrats or the tax-cut-and-spend policies of the prior administration."

<SNIP>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/18/mike-pence-explains-why-a_n_650374.html?ref=twitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Someone on this board has the information:
1. Unemployment insurance generates $ 1.68 for every $1.00 spent.
2. Bush's* tax cuts generated about $0.38 for every $1.00 spent

Checkmate!

(This is what I remember, but it might be off just a little.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why oh why are the commentators so damn afraid of republicans
they let them spew their crap about spending and don't make them justify the fact that they said absolutely nothing when Bush was decimating the economy. when he started two wars and never ever included the cost in the deficit. when he gave all those tax cuts unpaid for and when he blew billions in surplus.

They talk about Democrats being without guts. I think all news commentators would have to dig ten feet up to even try to get them selves a spine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Makes no sense
The taxes could clearly be used to lower the deficit, so that makes no sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Overspending increases economic activity until the whole thing collapses.
You can tell me that we can spend beyond what we make for eternity but I won't believe you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-18-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. jobless benefits also result in instant economic stimulation
because recipients spend the money immediately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC