Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House official praises staff for excellent firing of Sherrod

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:50 AM
Original message
White House official praises staff for excellent firing of Sherrod
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0710/In_meeting_Messina_praised_Sherrod_handling.html

(...)

But three Democratic sources said Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina, singled the White House's initial response to the incident out for praise in the regular 8:30 a.m. staff meeting Tuesday morning. The sources differed on the substance of Messina's praise, but concurred that he had praised the speed of White House communications in response to the flap, which was driven by a misleadingly-edited video posted to Andrew Breitbart's Big Government website.

One source, who is unhappy with the administration's handling of the incident, paraphrased Messina's remarks: "We could have waited all day – we could have had a media circus – but we took decisive action and it’s a good example of how to respond in this atmosphere."

But two other senior officials present at the meeting, who responded to a call to the White House press office, said the gist of Messina's words had been conveyed to POLITICO inaccurately, and that Messina -- a top political operative and senior manager -- was merely speaking in his capacity as Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations and staff "cheerleader."

Messina was simply praising the White House staff for "communicating well, sharing well, basically rising to the occasion" on the Sherrod story, one official said. "It was an institutional or procedural point."

Messina could not have been praising a White House decision to fire Sharron, the source said, because the decision was made by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. *sigh*
I think I'm going to go make a Key Lime Pie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. some people say!!!!
:rofl:

good comedy here lately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's all it takes Whisp
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Let's be the media
The RW media

Isn't it time to stop hyping the RW media's persepective?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. And Politico of all people. Why am I not surprised this is coming from you?
Helping the smear campaign seems to be your goal in life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emeritus Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. But wasn't Politico a Very Good Outlet yesterday when it quoted a WH official denying involvement?
Edited on Wed Jul-21-10 11:20 AM by Emeritus
I didn't see anyone casting doubt on yesterday's Politico article that quoted a WH official denying having pressed Sherrod to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I say FUCK POLITICO all of the time, so I can say it now....
FUCK POLITICO and their unnamed sources! :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Actually I have to agree to this.
I didn't even notice it was politico until too late. Ugh..I don't trust politico nor think they are a trust worthy outlet. However, their post was reaffirmed later by several other outlets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Actual title of Politico piece - "In meeting, Messina praised Sherrod handling"
And makes this point -

"In a closed staff meeting Tuesday morning, a senior administration praised elements of the White House's initial response to a partial video of a speech by a Department of Agriculture official -- a response that the Administration has since reversed.

White House officials yesterday afternoon told reporters they did not press Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to demand the resignation of Shirley Sherrod, but that they stood by the hasty decision; last night, they took credit for pressing Vilsack to rehire her when a fuller video revealed that her remarks had been edited to mean the opposite of what she said."

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. I just knew this had to be Politico...
The noxious smell was overpowering almost immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC