Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Historic Move, HHS Encourages LGBT-Inclusive Sexual Education

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:19 PM
Original message
In Historic Move, HHS Encourages LGBT-Inclusive Sexual Education

In Historic Move, HHS Encourages LGBT-Inclusive Sexual Education

Last Friday, under the Affordable Care Act, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released two funding announcements regarding sexual education. For the first time, notes Ty Cobb at the Human Rights Campaign, the “language in the funding announcements for federal sexuality education dollars” urges states designing their sexual education programs to consider the needs of LGBT and questioning youth:

As States design their programs, ACF also encourages them to consider the needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning youth and how their programs will be inclusive of and non-stigmatizing toward such participants. Under this announcement, funds are available for projects operating in one or multiple sites that target impacts on key sexual behavioral outcomes for youth.

The funding announcement funnels $55 million to the new Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) — “which supports comprehensive, evidence-based efforts to prevent teen pregnancy and reduce sexually-transmitted infections” — and $50 million to abstinence-only programs. Since marriage equality is not recognized in most states, abstinence-only-until-marriage programs often exclude LGBT students and do not fully address their needs. However, HHS does require that both PREP and abstinence programs are “medically accurate,” which is a huge step in the right direction for LGBT-inclusive sex education.

Still, past attempts to embrace LGBT-inclusive sexual education have, unsurprisingly, attracted considerable conservative vitriol. When the Minnesota legislature considered comprehensive sexual health education appropriate for its straight and LGBT students in March, the state’s right-wing Minnesota Family Council was quick to testify that comprehensive sex education would advance “homosexual behavior, anal or oral sex, things like that.”

And in June, after pressure from parents, officials in Johnson County, KS reversed their decision to accept a $300,000 comprehensive sexual education grant involving Planned Parenthood. Last month, a broad K-12 health and nutrition education proposal in Helena, MT emphasizing tolerance, safe sex, and anti-bullying caused the right-wing to go apoplectic over the curriculum as a weapon to promote a homosexual agenda.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh my gosh. Great news. So many forget the youth in this.
Thanks Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any comments in opposition to this? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Amazing
I am shocked that the Perpetually Pissed caucus hasn't found an excuse to gripe about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. They'll Just Ignore It Because These Type Of Things Shatter Their Whole Meme
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 10:16 AM by Beetwasher
And Obama does stuff like this all the time, under the radar and there is absolutely NO reason for the Obama admin. to do this type of stuff except that it's the RIGHT thing. It would mean they would have to question their preconceived notions about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. This will drive the Religious bigots insane.
"The Kenyan Communist is trying to teach Sodomy to our childrens!!!" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. This is something I would expect them to riot over n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. so let me get this straight, so to speak
47.6% of the money is still being spent on abstinence only programs, and this is a huge victory? Incidently the medically accurate only refers to the PREP programs and not the abstience only ones. I actually looked at the link that both they and you provide. Is this a step in the right direction, yes. Is it something as someone who works with gay youth as part of my job I am satisified with, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "and this is a huge victory?" First
the President made comprehensive education the goal and funded it. Republicans did slip amendments into the bill, that one belongs to Orin Hatch.

Second, you don't think that, in addition to an administration determined to focus on comprehensive sex education, LGBT-Inclusive Sexual Education is a victory?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. It is if you are a kid in the about 52% of classes that aren't abstinence
only. I am not saying it isn't a victory at all but it surely isn't a great victory that your OP suggests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. "I am not saying it isn't a victory at all but it surely isn't a great victory that your OP suggests
So because a Republican got an amendment in to fund abstinence programs, funding LBGT-inclusive education is less of a victory?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. yes it is
A miniscule less than half the money spent on sex ed in this country will be on abstinence only. Oh, and Obama was quick to threaten a veto when money was being spent on a plane he didn't want (and I agree with him on that) but no such threat accompanied this. I suspect that most of this money will be spent in states that are already hospitable to this kind of sex ed and not in states where they aren't. I doubt a gay kid in say Texas will learn anything now he wouldn't have the day before this bill passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Your argument is simply to diminish the fact that this is a huge victory while
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 11:56 AM by ProSense
ignoring the reality of the administration's position and the fact that they are in charge:

"However, HHS does require that both PREP and abstinence programs are “medically accurate,” which is a huge step in the right direction for LGBT-inclusive sex education."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. that statement is baldly false
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 12:00 PM by dsc
I read the link that supposedly backed that up since I had no idea how an abstinance only program could be medically accurate. Turns out that the medically accurate clause only refers to the PREP program not the abstinence only ones. It is a pdf so I can't cut and paste but it is in there in section III vii. Oh, and I pointed that out already in my first post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Denial?
The administration doles out the funds. You can sit here and argue about the abstinence programs all day, but it doesn't change the facts of the announcement, which is: "In Historic Move, HHS Encourages LGBT-Inclusive Sexual Education"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. you are the one in denial
I don't care who signs the checks. Abstinence only has a very defined meaning. If half the money is going to that crap, then half the country will be not one whit better off than before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Here:
The fall of abstinence-only

According to the council's "Sexuality Education and Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Programs in the States" report (say that seven times in a row), $190 million has been poured into real live sex education in the many months since Obama took office. Initiatives like the Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP), offered up by Democrat Sen. Max Baucus as part of the Obama healthcare package, fund education about sex that is complete, non-religious and, you know, based on facts. The great news is that it's not just the feds doing their part -- states, cities, and individual school districts are starting to forge ahead with more comprehensive sex ed as well.


Feel free to read the rest of the article.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I agree with much of this article
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 12:38 PM by dsc
but funny how you left out the parts about GA and TX which, it should be noted, are the heart of my problem. The last sentence sums it up.

But it's better than nothing.

It is, as the title said, a step in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Beautiful Move, Absolutely Beautiful
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Freakishly enough some people on this thread don't think so. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. "I just don't think it is as good as you and the OP state."
The OP has nothing to do with whether or not abstinence programs still exists. It has everything to do with the fact that the Obama administration supports and is funding LBGT-inclusive education.

You introduced your objection to the existence of abstinence programs simply to reject the important and historic nature of the announcement.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That is like when a student says they should get an A because they answered
questions 6 through 10 correct, never mind they missed 1 - 5. It would be one thing if the funding weren't nearly equal. I do give A's to students who get questions 2-10 correct but miss question 1. I could live with a 90/10 split but this is 52/48. That is not a humungous victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. No, it's not
Edited on Tue Aug-03-10 01:07 PM by ProSense
The OP answers one question: Is LGBT-inclusive education now part of the program?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Oh gee
then maybe you should have chosen a different article to quote. Clearly they felt the split was relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC