President Obama has highest legislative success rate than any president ever in more than 50 years.

Below is a link to a great article.
I hope everyone takes the time to take a look ;)

President Obama stands as the only President with huge Domestic and International achievements.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/8/8/891239/-President-Obama-stands-as-the-only-President-with-huge-domestic-and-International-achievements

It's what he's been doing that we're not happy with.
such as propping up insurance companies and labelling it as "reform" and gutting public schools in favor of corporate charter schools.

Lots of pro big corporation appointees and legislation going on, but not much change

I'm just trying to be a good hostess on my thread :)

your attitude is appalling.

:sarcasm:

and there is not much hope for them being as liberal as Stevens

Stevens that even likes promoting as a liberal was considered a Republican and conservative when placed in power---you can't determine how one swings when they are voting----it's been said countless times. Which means that if there was a liberal judge, there's no proof they would be liberal during voting. That seems to be a crock.

....duh. Keep up with current events, MMkay?

more like current assumptions

have gone up, but Social Security benefits have remained the pretty much the same. Thus, in fact the benefits have gone down.

Thanks to our trade policies, the same is true for low-wage earners also. And let's don't even hope that unemployment benefits keep up with inflation.

We are told that we are having deflation. Yes, the cost of purchasing a house is lower - if you qualify for a loan, but food is more expensive, and clothing quality has declined. I suspect that the countries in which clothing is manufactured are exporting to the U.S. the clothing they used to export to much poorer countries.

after he took office. He hired Summers, Bernanke and Geithner, all pro-bank folks as his primary economic aides. Huge mistakes.

My suggestion at the time was that they fund renegotiation of the home loans. One thing they could have done was to extend the length of the leases and lower the interest rates. The banks would not have had to go through so many foreclosure and resale processes. The prices on housing would have declined less precipitously. The people being given the opportunity to refinance under the new program could have been penalized in some way that would have made the program fair. There are various ways you could do it. The priority should have been keeping as many people in their homes as possible without encouraging the values of the homes to rise. Sorry, I'm not explaining my ideas on how it could have been done very clearly. I had quite a detailed plan at the time, but it is, sadly, irrelevant now. I firmly believe my plan would have worked. It was inspired by my knowledge of the European real estate market, and especially by my knowledge of the experiences in the German legal system at the time of the great inflation.

and making preventive care available with no out of pocket costs. What planet do you live on?

at all, especially with regard to Social Security. If he can find a way to hand Social Security over to his banking buddies, he will do it. That is my opinion. I base that on his conduct thus far. Whenever he gets a chance to enrich bankers, he takes it.

As for Medicare, the Medicare Advantage plans that many of us seniors rely on for guidance in finding the medical care we need is going to become much more expensive. That means that your Aunt Mary who can't really balance her checkbook any more and pops a lot of pills will be trying to locate a heart specialist for herself. It's going to be very chaotic for a lot of older people and some will just get lost in the confusion.

Further, the Medicare Advantage plans provide a lot of preventive care for older people. I don't see how that will get done once the poorer seniors drop their Medicare Advantage plans. It's going to be a mess. And I think that instead of saving money, the straight Medicare will cost more.

So, many of them don't think he's been able to get things done. To them he's a corporatist sell out in what he has been able to get done.

providing health care SERVICES to those who need it is success, not forcing folks to buy POS policies that they can't afford, nor afford to use.

Otherwise someone might accuse that article of being hyperbole and personal opinion rather than the mathematically-calculated scientific proof that the title undisputably claims it is.

I'd like to know too.

who unrec such 'trivia'.

Where did my DU go?

I never imagined DU would be allowed to go anti-Democrat, but here we are. I think I'm going to throw up.

Unrecs are already flying.

rather than a serious assessment of Obama's legislative accomplishments...

:eyes:

:eyes:

Because I defend this president against his critics on DU, for crying out loud.

This site has become as anti-Obama as a Tea party site.

Please pass me the barf-bucket when you're done with it

Vice President Bachmann will lead the Conservative Inquisition.

secretary of state perhaps. He might get lost. OMG.

But coach, I'm doing a great job as quarterback! In each of our four plays from scrimmage, we got two yards! That's gotta be some kind of record!

YMMV might vary about what constitutes "huge". The healthcare law is the bare minimum which could conceivably do anything, and the bank reform bill stops far short of the laws which were repealed 10 years ago causing the problem.

In terms of quarterback ratings, the only one better was Steve Young. Which means that Romo and Rivers are better than Joe Montana, Tom Brady, Troy Aikman, Terry Bradshaw, Johnny Unitas, and every other QB except Steve Young.

a great legislative record. Not once has he really sent an idea to Congress that would have drastically changed anything. Obama's administration is the least inclined to suggest anything that is in the slightest unsure to get through Congress. That means he is achieving very little in terms of the change the country means. It means he isn't even trying.

in the present political climate, as so many are so quick to say whenever criticism is leveled at him for not acting on particular issues.

unmatched by any President, Democrat or Republican, in over 50 years. I understand why Republicans are so furious about this fact, so enamored as they of FUBAR, failure and "F"-Up.

mike kohr

C'mon.

:P

Economy needs to start turning around yesterday.

for the rest of us? Not much AT ALL.

Obama is supposed to change 40+ years of problems coming to a head in 2 years---how does that bloody make sense. He's got Bush problems (both Father and son), he's got a whole lot of Clinton problems like DOMA and DADT, he's got Reagan problems he's trying to fix. And yeah, it's realistic to say he's going to be able to clean them all up. And if you're implying he's causing more problems---then that's utterly false on its face.

All the while surrounding himself with the very people who caused the problems. I'm sick of the excuses.
He said to make him do it, then he turned a stone deaf ear to all those who were trying to make him do it.

You might not like the health bill but it had a lot of good things---not to mention much of the bill's passed. Such as, Lily ledbetter, the hate crimes, Native American, creating more biking spots and so on. To even imply his policies don't have or lacking is a joke.

I'm up for it. With no real regulation of health insurance rates, people are not going to be able to afford even lousy insurance with their subsidy. The lucky ones are the poor - they get Medicaid. If you have a pre-existing condition you may or may not be lucky depending on the health of your bank account. I'm one of the unlucky ones. If I discover a gold mine in the back yard, maybe I'll be able to afford the pool. Financial reform is another near waste of time. Read the latest Matt Taibbi article in Rolling Stone. Creating more biking spots???? That gets you excited??? Maybe that accounts for some of what I read on DU: low expectations.