Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's not 'infighting', it's not 'lack of support'...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:49 PM
Original message
It's not 'infighting', it's not 'lack of support'...
it's a passionate debate about the direction of our nation.








And that's not a bad thing.O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. It goes past "passionate debate" every time someone says "Obama = Bush"
Or comes anywhere close to it.

It also goes past passionate debate when one side absolutely refuses to acknowledge anything good that's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't like it either...
but that's why it has to be include. You can't deny people the right to free speak just because you don't like/agree with what they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No one is denying any rights.
But that doesn't mean people like Gibbs can't call them out on what they are saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. And that's not a bad thing.
Apparently the elites who control our country consider it a bad thing, which is why the WH sent Gibbs out to make those statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. As long as it's civil.....
...name calling, and petty accusations do not constitute debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It would be a nice start....
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kjackson227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is a lack of support, when debaters clearly state that they're withdrawing support...
because their issues aren't being met fast enough. The discussion/debate is killed at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC