The "Obama is like Bush" professional Left

can kiss my ass.
They are actively working undoing everything I've worked for.
They do not nor will they ever speak for me. period.

They certainly don't speak for me and mine either. Thankfully, most of the people I know have never heard of the major whiners.

1) Those who think Obama is pretty much the same as Bush; and

2) Those who insist that (1) don't exist.

there are one or two big things that I wish he had done or is doing MORE differently than what the b*sh whitehouse did...

Obama said the troops are coming home from Afghanistan, Iraq. He's trying to close Gitmo except he has so much opposition. A big majority in both houses would allow us to proceed with healthcare towards a single payer. I could go on. I don't see Obama like Bush. I wish Obama had gone ahead and had Bush jailed!

Obama said the troops are coming home from Afghanistan, Iraq

Obama campaigned on reducing the troop levels in Iraq and increasing them in Afghanistan. The Bush administration negotiated a drawdown in troop levels in Iraq, which Obama has continued on schedule. A hypothetical President McCain would have had to reduce Iraq troop levels at the same rate (or renegotiate a status of forces agreement -- long odds with the current Iraqi government). Bush showed no inclination to increase troop levels in Afghanistan; this is in fact a difference between Obama and Bush, and one that Obama campaigned on. I totally understand antiwar people protesting the increase in Afghanistan, but this is one thing that nobody can conceivably call a "betrayal", since he's done exactly what he said he would in Afghanistan, and exactly what Bush negotiated we had to do in Iraq.

He's trying to close Gitmo except he has so much opposition.

He's commander in chief of the armed forces; he could hand Gitmo back to Raul tomorrow if he wanted to. I totally dig the "he doesn't have a magic wand" point on a lot of things, but on where military detainees are kept he actually does have the closest thing on earth to a magic wand. He could put them on a brig ship in the middle of the Atlantic. He could put them in Leavenworth. He could put them on Diego Garcia. It is clearly and without question in his power to stop holding detainees in Gitmo, and he has chosen not to do that, despite promising in the campaign he would.

A big majority in both houses would allow us to proceed with healthcare towards a single payer

That remains to be seen, since we haven't had a big enough majority yet. As it is, we ended up with a plan written 15 years ago by the American Enterprise Institute.

To the extent there is an argument that "Obama is Bush", it's about continuing some very specific and dangerous precedents set by Bush: warrantless surveillance, renditions, assassinations of US citizens, etc.

So, if what you care about (and admit it or not, we all do have "majors" here) is civil liberties and the curtailment of executive power, then there is something of that argument there.

The terms themselves date back to who sat where in Louis XIV's court (seriously).

We're in the middle of a party realignment in the US (we have one every 40 years or so) so a lot of things aren't going to line up with old labels. I think Obama is closing out a long line of conservative Presidents, a lot like how Nixon closed out a long line of liberal Presidents.

dream on if you think that party realignment is going to be established in the USA.

Our last one happened during the 70s, the one before that was in the early 30s, before that the turn of the century or so, before that the Civil War, and before that the breakup of the Democratic-Republican party after Madison.

And, no, I don't know what you meant. I don't predict right-wing government, I just pointed out that people who are concerned about executive power have some basis for equating this administration with the last one.

Big difference between closing the prison and closing the naval base.

It's a very important base for a lot of strategic reasons (none of which, oddly enough, have to do with Cuba itself).

Obama never said the soldiers were coming back from Afghanistan. Some people really weren't paying any attention to his campaign policies.

And yes, this drives me crazy. Obama campaigned on increasing troop levels in Afghanistan and he did so.

Obama campaigned on getting troops out of Iraq in 16 months but W essentially beat him to the punch by negotiating a status of forces agreement with a longer timetable; once that was signed Obama was pretty much stuck with it unless he wanted to reopen that whole can of worms with an Iraqi government that is less friendly to us daily.

Obama=Bush is going to far in rhetoric.

only because Obama is blaming Bush (which he should) A fine mess you got me in Stanley).

They can kiss my ass, as well!

More straw people.

But, I'm not sure to whom.

:eyes:

and I doubt any liberal, professional or otherwise has EVER said that.

I guess I don't go to those posts. I have seem people ask another poster "So you think Bush and Obama are the same?" and then the flame war is on. That is different than the current fire storm. Maybe Gibbs read it on the DU. I don't fucking know. I've never heard any one say it.

"What drug would make someone say Obama is the same as Bush?"

Most common answer: Truth serum/sodium pentathol

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8914091&mesg_id=8916253

that thread, a couple of people complained that he was continuing some of Bush's policies. That does not mean they think they are the same. Perhaps it was deleted.:shrug:

Others see what they want to be there.

said it a lot. I quit counting how many time he typed it after 20. I got bored with the whole bullshit RW talking point.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8883047&mesg_id=8883350

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8869989&mesg_id=8874740

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8869989&mesg_id=8875356

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8869989&mesg_id=8872081


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8866781&mesg_id=8872930

I can find plenty more....

I'm tired of this game on this board. Thank's for posting those.

They're like children. "Uh, uh. No one ever said that. I didn't see that anywhere. Prove it."

It's no skin off of their noses if someone else said it so what is the point of pretending like no one has? It really makes you wonder about what exactly is going on here.

Talk about games.

I guess I wonder why you are offended by somebody pointing that out. What do you care if you haven't said it? It doesn't change the fact that its been said many times for well over a year. Why would someone make that up?

They say it, they are proud when they say it and then they want to pretend like they never did when it suits their purpose. I consider it to be childish game playing by a small group of people on this board. If they can't stand by their words than they shouldn't post them. But there is absolutely nothing I despise more than people who intentionally refuse to communicate honestly.

An honest mistake is one thing, but a pattern of intentionally saying something and then denying it and trying to weasel out of it when someone mentions it is pathetic at best. They need to grow up and own it or, as they like to say we tell them to do, STFU because they aren't worth listening to.

Just to be clear, I am not accusing you of anything.

link # 1,2,3,4, are links to ONE thread. I made the comment "Fascinating read" about what Chris Hedges had written. Sorry I must have missed the part where he said Obama and Bush are the same.

Thread #5 was when President Obama directed his Health and Human Services Secretary Sebelius, to issue a regulation for healthcare reforms high-risk insurance pools. Totally a suck up move to the republicans that was not necessary and a slap in the face to women. I never said OR read in those TWO threads that Obama and Bush are the same, of course when I see some names,I just skip over and don't read what they say. I'm sure you will find a lot of my comments, even (gasp) a few nice ones about Obama.

Your stress over the criticism of the President is bad for your health. He a grown man and I'm sure he can handle it.
I have heard that chanting can relieve stress. You should try it sometime.

Hedges is known for his "OBama is like Bush" Comparisons, if you didn't know.

Those are just your every day DU members.

who want to make sure that Obama doesn't give them a shiver down their leg.
It's like being tougher on Obama is the in thing. Kind of like the way the MSM
is called "liberal". :eyes:


FDL - Obama Administration Follows Bush/Cheney On Politicization Of DOJ
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/07/04/obama-administration-follows-bushcheney-on-politicization-of-doj/


David Sirota: Like Bush, Obama Moves to Bury Bad Economic Data
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/like-bush-obama-moves-to_b_484721.html


The Atlantic: On National Security, Is Obama Just Like Bush?
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/On-National-Security-Is-Obama-Just-Like-Bush-3183


Alternet: Under Obama, Like Bush, Immigrant Suspects Face Injustice ...
http://www.alternet.org/immigration/141118/under_obama,_like_bush,_immigrant_suspects_face_injustice/



Talkleft: Enemy Combatants And Criminal Trials: Is Obama Like Bush ...
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2010/1/5/11168/85336



MotherJones: Obama=Bush?
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2009/03/obamabush



Counterpunch: Obama and Duncan's Education Policy: Like Bush's, Only Worse.
http://www.counterpunch.org/weil08242009.html



Ted Rall: Obama doesn't talk like Bush; he just acts like him ...
http://www.sj-r.com/opinions/x1331535931/Ted-Rall-Obama-doesn-t-talk-like-Bush-he-just-acts-like-him



Christian Science Monitor: Obama touts withdrawal in Iraq war. Does he sound like Bush ...
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2010/0802/Obama-touts-withdrawal-in-Iraq-war.-Does-he-sound-like-Bush



NPR: Obama's Homeland Security Looks A Lot Like Bush's : The Two-Way
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2009/07/obamas_homeland_security_to_lo.html



"Little difference" between Obama, Bush in substance
www.chomsky.info/interviews/20090624.htm


Of course, there's more.

Guess we're a week behind on the loyalty tests, as if I give a crap.

and who the "fake" ones are?

That purity test?

I don't give a crap either, mainly cause I don't do loyalty tests.

The post was deleted, the evidence is here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x403190#403296

Good enough for ya?

I must confess I don't read every thread and every reply. Some people whose opinions I don't value I skip right over them. That is a silly thing to say. "treasonous fucking piece of shit " is way beyond the line.

If Hillary were President, they'd be doing it to her, too. Maybe then you would have noticed the obvious.

to say. She is totally irrelevant to this, she was the one who lost the election. I happen to believe there is a difference in saying that Obama is continuing Bush's policies (and I have seen that said a lot, and in some instances I agree) and saying Bush and Obama are the same.

You are just a waste of my time. Have a nice day

Fake Democrats can kiss my fucking ass.
They are actively working to undermine our president by allowing bad policy decisions to go unchallenged. I want my President to be the best President he can be, so I refuse to stay quiet when he does the wrong things. I want him to be great.

Those that dont challenge the President want to promote the status quo and dont want our President to be great, go fuck yourselves.

I agree with that statement.

about challenging our President when he makes idiotic decisions and panders to the right? Are you willing to challenge him to be the best President he can be? Or are you going to sit on the sidelines and watch.

and I also get to decide what is idiotic, and what is pandering and what is the art of the possible, and all of that shit! I get to decide for myself who cries like a baby anytime criticism is aimed at them, but yet, they are the first one out of the gate ignoring anything good, cause for them, it ain't about the policies, it is about their dislike for a particular personality.

Have you heard about me? I'm one of those who supports the President 90% of the time,
and therefore the 10% time I'm pissed, I try not to scream too too loud, cause my aim is to
get some progress, not to be catered to, or have my ass kissed so much.

You know... like the public option. That is something worth screaming about.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

+100000

But, seeking to undermine and delegitimize is something else.

President Obama has enacted most liberal agenda since LBJ. That isn't status-quo. Yeah, I suppose someone could argue that it's actually Nixon. That person would be a douche.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/

The most left around here need to get their expectations calibrated with reality and the presidents performance. Not happy with those compromises? Guess what, neither are most people around here, but the "Sensibles"TM don't all give ourselves wedgies over it every day.

Havent seen that since about an hour ago, you can never say you guys aren't predictable.

and some unnamed sources. Plueazzze! :eyes:

:eyes:

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

From the rules: - Broadly suggesting that there is no difference between Barack Obama and George W. Bush, or that there is no difference between Democrats and Republicans.


"Ralph Nader Was Right About Barack Obama," by Chris Hedges

Pick any article by Hedges, a favorite among those who advance the "Obama = Bush" meme, and the theme is still the same.

At least they've been shamed into silence, to this site's benefit.

But, yeah, the next time some malcontent posts one of Hedges's "Obama=Bush" rants, we can be sure to document it.

The rules of this site do not prohibit a poster from saying, because it is entirely true, that Obama has retained damaging policies from the Bush era and he is, therein, like Bush in embracing the same policies. Continuing to misconstrue those arguments into some cartoonish "Obama is Bush" rhetoric with an = sign does not change any of that.

offers nothing more than Bush's policies wrapped up in a new package.

Except the second part, which I didn't say. Anyone who wants to know what I did, can read it.

that's where I draw the line. Maybe a bit before that even. One thread suggested such today.

In the same way the pain inflicted by a friend or loved one is worse than that inflicted by a stranger, being let down by the leadership of one of your own can be felt more than being predictably disgusted by a Republican/Conservative.

who are you fucking trying to fool? :eyes:

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

nothing more than open bashing of the President--holding him personally responsible for generations of failure of locally-controlled school districts.


I mean, we all know that Arne Duncan is the devil, and Obama, therefore, for hiring him is a minion of Satan, and Satan incarnate is Cheney......and it goes from there....

ridiculous, but effective for those with an agenda.
It's an excuse, and that's all some folks need.

agenda.

K&R

PS Carlos you have to change your evil ways baby

:hippie: :toast: :patriot:

What, exactly? :shrug:

although I didn't expect all fucking change.

indirectly allow the Republicans to take back power.
In fact, for them, it will serve the Administration
or some bullasshit like that.

So they are working to undo the fact that I worked hard for years
to get someone who would set this country back a bit straighter....
and I believe that is what has been happening.

I believe that the excuse has been "Holding his feet to the fire"....
but what is happening now, is that many wouldn't mind one bit "burning the motherfucking house down to the ground".

I disagree that the goal of the Left is to put Republicans back in power--whether directly or indirectly.

You're within your rights to join Mr. Emmanuel in calling the Left's tactics of holding Obama's feet to the fire on issues "fucking retarded," but that criticism of tactics shouldn't be confused with the goals and purpose of those tactics.

more than anything.

Number one, I am the fucking Left. Keep that fact in mind when you articulate.

Number two, I don't need you telling me that I'm within my right about anything! Who in the hell do you think you are?

Number three, Holding fire to Obama's feet is not what I'm seeing the Independent/extreme far Nader voting Left fringe do. What I see them doing is never giving Obama credit for shit, Blaming him for every fucking thing wrong (even if it took 30 to 40 years in the making)and pouncing on anything that might be an excuse to dog him out, including twisting quotes, omitting nuance, and playing 6 degrees of separation in order to show Obama as evil. In fact, they are just like the fucking right, and they need to be fucking criticized for what they are doing, cause they aren't helping a damn thing, and in particular, they are not helping us pass any meaningful policies....
cause their asses are too busy being critical about this President to get anything else fucking done. Do they praise the School lunch nutrition bill that just passed? hell the fuck no! Do they clap about the 20 billion state aids package that will save the jobs of the very critical teachers? Hell the fuck no! Do they discuss anything good that Obama has done and put all of those policies in context. Why should they? Especially when their aim to criticize, and do nothing more.

I'm not quite sure what I've done to make you so very mad. I don't believe I was uncivil to you in the slightest.

Perhaps you could try re-reading my post later, when you're less angry? :shrug:

You spoke to me as if you spoke for the Left. You don't.
You then put words in my mouth.

I gave you the truth, and you saw it as angry.
I saw it as factual and on point.

We obviously don't see things the same way.
That's ok too.

Yeah, that's precisely what you did:

Well, if by "the truth" you mean "FrenchieCat's opinions," then sure, I guess. Personally, I'd call it "angry anti-intellectualism."


Nope. I opined on the goals of the Left. If you disagree with my assertion that the Left's goal is not "to put Republicans back in power," yet you self-identify as a Leftist, I'd say you've got some 'splainin' to do.


Where? I try hard not to do that, so please support your claim. Thanks.

---

Again, I think you should try re-reading my post above when you're less angry at ... well, whatever it is you're angry at. I certainly haven't given you cause to speak to me this way.

"You're within your rights to join Mr. Emmanuel in calling the Left's tactics of holding Obama's feet to the fire on issues "fucking retarded,"


I didn't call anyone fucking retarded, and I am part of the Left.

But perhaps I can reconstruct the grammar of the sentence in a format less likely to rouse your ire:



Hopefully that makes it crystal clear that I put no words in your mouth, and that it was not my intention to play "No True Scotsman" with you.

Now can we move past this petty bickering? I'd like to hear your non-incensed response to my argument regarding tactics vs. goals.

(An apology for flying off the handle at me without cause and engaging in personal attacks would be nice, too, but I won't hold my breath.)

But silly me, I still expect people to directly address the points I make in each post without the incessant team-sports "haters vs. cheerleaders" bullshit.

Not very pragmatic of me, I fear. :shrug:

Swoop in squawking and making a lot of noise, crap all over everything, and fly away.

Quelle surprise. :eyes:

Thanks for the teensy-tiny dogpile, though. :hi: In your case, however, at least I know what I've done to make you so angry that you feel compelled to stalk me.

I've seen rank and file people say any and everything. Never heard that on cable. Plus, Gibbs went off on Single Payer advocates, peace advocates, and current candidate Democrat Dennis Kucinich and his supporters.
Like Gibbs, you fail to say who these cable professionals are, what they actually said. Just more barfing broadly at 'them'.

Either that, or you know and are just too special to tell the rest of us.

I know which option I choose....

...the only time Obama is compared to Bush (and that's largely true even around here) is when the administration continues a Bush policy.

In which case...

Well said.

AMATEUR LEFT!

Sorry, Keith Olbermann just said that.


And it's TRUE!

fucking sad.

I'll try to do better next time, K?
What do I know? I'm just a kid,
and you know, you have all of that
experience in the real world dealing
with real situations of real life and shit,
an doing real things that help real people....


Now, can I have that lollipop you promised me?
Hey, can I....can I? Please, oh please.

:P

is to pretend it doesn't exist. I've seen plenty of it, it ususually comes in the form of posts within an OP.

Must be a thread over at that site that can't be named cause they plot against DU
at all times, when they aren't talking about me. :rofl:

I'm not going to let a collection of petulant brats and dimestore wannabe revolutionaries screw up the causes I've spent the last two decades fighting for.

Color me delighted to piss in you Wheaties.

I've served on my city committee, my state central committee, the Young Dems national committee, in my legislature's Democratic caucus, and as a Dem city councilor that gutted our schools, libraries, and public transit while giving fat subsidies to connected cronies. I worked 20 hour days for Joe Biden, Paul Simon, Paul Tsongas, and countless local candidates.

But thanks for playing.

it's that they are willing to accept nothing if they don't get it, and on their terms.

fucking shame on you.


FUCK.

:nuke:

but they like to pretend they speak for all

Those screaming the loudest about Gibbs are those who've been doing exactly what he called them out for.

They don't like that one bit.

Welcome to the Ignore list, btw.

It's no secret, btw.

Dennis Kucinich broke the 1% threshhold in exactly one state. Let's be generous and throw in some of Edward's supporters. That might get you up to about 2%.

The other 98% just aren't as crabby and noisy.

and so should you.

How about that?

If you are part of the Professional Left who likes to compare Obama to Bush,
then you know what to do. K? :)

embrace that inner woodchuck

That's exactly why Gibbs was correct in calling out those
who for months have been talking about spine, cowards, wimps,
sell outs and all of that shit. Folks can criticize all they want,
but acting surprised that someone would have something to say
about it at some point; well that's priceless.

so I don't know what it's all about; but no one can deny that there have been a massive numbers of posts here on DU where people are in essence saying just that. I think the President has done an outstanding job and when references are made that President Obama is like Bush I find it disgusting.

I'm disappointed in you. I thought you could do better!

(projection, perhaps? :hide: )

and I will hint to your authoritarian tone,
as though you know better than me what's up.....

There.

(not)

needs their heads examined.

It's one thing to say Obama is not a socialist. Saying he is no different from Bush is inexcusable.

So many of Bush's policies are still in place, with no change on the horizon...

Of course Obama is better than Bush, how can one not be, when you set the bar that low?

It's just that with all his lofty campaign promises, we expected more, so much more... if he can't get his agenda passed with a Democratic congress, how's he going to get anything done with a Republican one, if indeed they do take back over in a few months? The window of opportunity is fast closing, if he would only seize the moment and really push through change and give us all that hope that we long for.

Best to ignore them and blame one man....
that's so much easier, and takes absolutely no work...
none.

USING that bully-pulpit to help nudge Congress along, instead of constantly capitulating before the fight has even begun.

Believe me, I want to see Obama succeed. I really do. It just seems like he's giving up on the agenda he himself laid out in the campaign without even trying for it, most of the time.

Blame the Republicans all you want, but that won't change the fact that if we had more bold leadership, our morale would be higher and we might actually be able to WIN seats instead of LOSE them this November.

Many of his critics here stated a long time ago they weren't watching him anymore,
cause it was all about action and not words.
Now it's about words.

What it is is about just not supporting him in general
cause he can't do miracles.

As for your morale, you did it to yourself,
complaining all of the damn time,
and never seeing the nuance and complexities in the make up of our government,
and ignoring good news like the fucking plague!
It was never writing to the Republicans and shitting on them....
because that would be too hard.....
and expecting Obama to do the heavy lifting by himself.

Generalize much? I love how you lump everyone together like that. Bra-freaking-vo

I thought only right wingers could do that kind of stuff.

We shit on them all the time, we wrote angry LTTE's, we phoned, we made our voices heard.

I supported this President during the primaries and beyond. We had the perfect chance to roll back most of the worst excesses of the Bush Administration, and it was squandered. No, I don't blame the President alone in this, but he has been complicit.

We could be out of Iraq by now. We could be out of Afghanistan by now. But in the latter case, we're not even moving in the right direction! Bush's legacy lives on, almost 2 years after he was shown the door... at some point we have to quit blaming Bush and ask ourselves what needs to be done NOW to change course in this country.

Can't we at least move in the right direction? Health Care "Reform" that strengthened the private insurance conglomerates, failure to restore our civil liberties, throwing so many loyal groups under the bus (as much you may hate that phrase)... what does he expect will happen come November 2012, let alone November 2010?

They don't matter cuz she isn't screaming about them.

You wrote:

It was never writing to the Republicans and shitting on them....
because that would be too hard.....

It would have been nice if Mr. Gibbs had actually applied his comments to the Rethugs and not to members of his own party.

-PLA

k&R

This in not about you or me. Many of us, not just you, have worked very hard and we will continue to work for what we believe in. And we are all entitled to our opinions and those of us who are disappointed in Obama will *not* kiss your ass. Thank you. And I don't presume to speak for you. But I will continue to speak for myself.

so be it!

:kick:

K&R

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

but yourself and more importantly in being right.
Each and everyone of your post demonstrate a certain
ugliness that can't even be bought.....

Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

I'm a moderate democrat, not a leftist. Frenchiecat, you do not come across as a leftist. And your impassioned defenses of everything Obama does comes across as a 'personal' love for the man. As far as I've noticed you haven't been explaining why you think the policies and legislative actions are progressive. Sunday I was dining with a couple of friends who are MOR republicans, not particularly political. Obama's actions regarding the war and failures on health care reform were too much like Bush even for them. And the Cat Food Commission scares them, too.

http://open.salon.com/blog/kevin_gosztola/2009/05/14/obama_employs_bush_administration_tactic_blocks_photos

Excerpt:



On Wednesday, Obama said he “would try to block the court-ordered release of photos showing U.S. troops abusing prisoners.” The release, which was to be the result of a Freedom of Information Act request made by the ACLU, had been reasonable in the final weeks of April, but today, Obama chose to come out against the release.

According to the Associated Press, “out of concern the pictures would "further inflame anti-American opinion" and endanger U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan” Obama planned to block them.

Obama intends to block the release of the photos because they may negatively impact American empire and American military adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. Gen. Ray Odierno, a prime architect of “the surge” in Iraq, and Gen. David Petraeus influenced Obama’s decision after informing the administration that they were afraid the photos will “cost American lives.”

Obama suggested that the “photos had already served their purpose in investigations of "a small number of individuals” and "the individuals who were involved have been identified, and appropriate actions have been taken."

Also, Obama made the argument that "these photos that were requested in this case are not particularly sensational, especially when compared to the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib."


When choosing to make a “mockery” out of his “promise of transparency and accountability” (as one member of the ACLU put it), Obama is fine with contending that if information requested does not show something worse than said previous atrocity or does not show that something more inhumane happened the information should not be released.

They sure have been busy unreccing your post. Whatcha gonna do? Haterz gonna hate.

Julie

As Sen. Bernie Sanders has said on several occasions now; America is already an Oligarchy. Your side has won.

http://blog.buzzflash.com/contributors/3546

:applause::applause::applause:

EOM

two full days of moaning, groaning, snot slinging, hand-wringing, tit-for-tat, batshit crazy accusations, lies, cries of disappointment, frustration, and alienation.

I'm beginning to believe more and more each day that Gibbs was right.

Thank you.

Yet they sneer at liberal journalists.

Why are you okay with that?

Thank you Frenchie.

IMO, Gibbs was more right than some will ever admit. Yapping from the cheap seats is easy.

We have seen them here. Folks who have been on the attack since day one while ignoring the Republicans.

OK, there are some things I'm disappointed about, among them the retaining of some Bush unconstitutional policies and the failure to prosecute Bush admin officials (including Bush and Cheney themselves) for designing and implementing them.

Nevertheless, Obama is not Bush. The stimulus package is not Bush. The jobs bill is not Bush. Even this weak health insurance reform is not Bush.

Right wing billboards in some parts of the country display the grinning face of the Frat Boy with the caption "Do you miss me yet?" No, I don't and it's going to take a lot more disappointment in Obama than I'm feeling before I do.

This is just a strawman and you've just been suckered by Rahm Breitbart and his hippie haters.

If the left is sooooooo irrelevant and that our votes don't count, then have fun trying to replace our votes with Republican ones.