Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Image the 12/21/2012 mania and its effect on voter turnout in Nov 2012. Why vote if you

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:35 PM
Original message
Image the 12/21/2012 mania and its effect on voter turnout in Nov 2012. Why vote if you
believe all is lost in a month? Candidates will spend their time trying to convince people the world will still be there for Christmas.

Only Palin will have a message for her followers, all others will stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting notion. But I don't believe the 2012 nonsense is mainstream . . .
fundie crapola. More like new-agey crapola. Shouldn't have much effect on rapturists and similar dimbulbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thats like saying Y2K was ignored except for only a few. n/t
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 10:55 PM by CK_John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Y2K was an issue.
Coders corrected. The IT Industry took a lot of flack for successfully solving an issue. Computers would have crashed. Dates and files would have been stored wrongly, but programers spent many hours correcting the code.

Do you wish it was not done so that you couldhave seen what the problem was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm talking about the millions who were scammed buying thousands in survival food and gear.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Mostly idiot Republicans
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 11:48 AM by TheBigotBasher
who do that for whatever reason. Some did it on the election of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Actually I never heard about "millions" buying survival food. More like . . .
A few hundred who probably would do the same if someone in Muskogee saw the image of 666 in a Breakfast Burrito and reported it to the local news.

What I do remember is full employment in the high-tech sector, with consultant programmers fixing thousands or millions of software systems that were, sure as shootin', going to fail without the upgrade. As I recall, very few did fail. You can call that a scam or a successful response to a techno-crisis, depending upon your point of view.

My point being that 2012 apocalypse folks are few and far between and have to take a number and queue up with the 2009 apocalypse nuts, and the 2010 apocalypse crazies, and the 2011 apocalypse fanatics . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. and they're STILL stuck with it all!!!
I always laugh when I think of that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, I won't be all that upset if the idiots...
...who believe in doomsday nonsense don't vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We should encourage them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. There won't be an election
Because it will already be clear to all that it would be pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Geez, don't dream up even rougher scenarios
than we will probably already face. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. IMO, this scenario will go into determining if it is worth running for a second term. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. What on earth do you mean - "if it is worth running for a second term" ?
Only those who are so gullible that they are a danger to themselves will be thinking the world will be about to end. But, since there is not a single bit of evidence or reason for anything whatsoever happening in Dec 2012, I think that even the really stupid voters will have ignored the movie and hucksters by then. There's only so many times that they can reply to "why is the world about the end?" with "just trust me, it is" before people get bored with them.

But I think that the vast majority of Democratic (or Obama-supporting, however you want to put it) voters have IQs above room temperature.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. 1) Voters need very little excuse to stay home. 2) Candidates will not be able to raise money too.
3) Why put the president in a losing situation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The dumb people vote for Republicans, or fringe candidates (Natural Law/Yogic Flying, perhaps?)
Worrying about a handful of idiots not turning out because they're crapping their pants due to some conmen is the most defeatist thing I've ever seen on DU. Anyone dumb enough to think the world is about to end will have lost all their money in other scams already, eg Nigerian emails, so it won't make any difference to fundraising.

What 'losing situation' are you forseeing? Is your attitude to elections "if it's not 100% certain we'll win, it'd be better not to stand, just in case there's a way we could lose?" If it is, then you'd never win anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You haven't a clue how things really work. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Educate me, then, wise one -WTF does "Why put the president in a losing situation" mean?
What is that, if not a ridiculous moan of "I don't really care about winning elections"?

What is your estimate of the number of thick-as-pigshit Republican voters, compared to thick-as-pigshit Democratic voters? I feel the number of idiot Republicans who said they were stocking up on ammo and guns in 2008 is an indication there are more stupid Republicans who can be fooled into thinking they're Going To Loose It All.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. IMO, Obama will not seek a second term because the polls will be to low to win. So
why stand for reelection and lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. So you're saying he'll be unpopular for some other reason
What reason? And isn't 2009 a bit early for defeatism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Depending on the 2010 elections is one area. Another is July 2011 troop withdrawal.
We will probably lose 5 senate seats in 2010. Will unemployment be still around 10%.

Will we need to go for a draft to relieve the army, I think so. None of which bodes well for a second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. This poster has been floating the "Obama shouldn't run in 2012" weirdness for a while.
This is just another way to "worry" that maybe he should step down so that we have a chance. You know, against Palin, the candidate with a MESSAGE!

:crazy:

It's simple: People who don't get off their asses to vote get the government they deserve, and forfeit their right to complain about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. 2012, the movie, is worse than any possible scenario on 12/21/2012
Either the planet will split in half or the aliens will force us to watch that fucking movie over and over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Really, it was that bad?
Can you give me a reference point of comparison? Were the special effects at least neat to watch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. A friend who saw it says it's worth seeing the special effects but otherwise not...
She's my movie-buddy, but as she likes action films and I don't, she has to give me the reviews on them. She did get me in to see District 9, though, and we agreed that the plot carried that one well.

But jeez-louise, I don't get these people that think a freakin' movie like 2012 is some kind of prophecy from a Mayan calendar or a 1st-century AD fiction writer. How dumb do you have to be?

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. For the Republicans to have a viable shot at the White House in 2012 they
would have to plan to lose the election.

That is to say, to be viable they would have to cut the malignant tumor of the Far Right fundie nutbags and teabaggers out of their flesh and then hobble on to some kind of recovery by redefinition in a far more moderate, problem-solving, cool-browed modality. If they try to remove the malignancy, it likely will kill the patient. Their other choice is to let the tumor grow and kill the patient over a longer period with far more pain.

They should -- but cannot -- implement a no-teabagger, no nutbag, no fundie rule and nominate people who are in the Chuck Percy mode of Republican politics, if they can find one or two to slap onto a ticket.

Very frankly I don't think that has any chance of happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Unquestionably the dumbest political analysis to ever grace this board
Congratulations!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. Oh we could only fucking HOPE that turnout will be low because of those fears.
All those religious zealots on the right and ... how to put this gently ... "naive and gullible" people on the left who buy into the nonsense staying home because they think the world will end a month after the 2012 election? That scenario would be nothing but a EPIC WIN for the rational people who show up at polls.

And by the way, some scholars believe the calendar we use (supposed to be based off the birth of Jesus) is off by about 4-6 years, which would make this 2013-2015, not 2009. Just some lol for thought. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Conversely people may say since it doesn't matter anyway I'll vote for Palin or her stand-in. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I imagine a lot of write-ins will read "Jesus"... Expect many undervotes that year. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
29. Encourage them to stay home and pray for The Rapture. It'll keep them out of the voting booths...
... which would not be a bad thing. If Palin has them all ginned up to vote for her because they think she'll be leading them through the End Times, that *would* be a bad thing unless she is splitting the Repub Party, in which case it would be a good thing.

The rest of us, who are not insane, will be checking our list of candidates and starting our Christmas shopping. We'll also be making appointments on our January 2013 calendar page.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
30. Most of those stupid enough to actually believe the 2012 stuff will vote Republican.
I hope they all stay home, and in '10, too.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC