|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:04 AM Original message |
Democrats agree to block Obama nominees by holding pro-forma sessions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Why? It makes no sense poltitically at all...?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. For the same reason they refused to hold a vote that was politically good for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 01:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
49. The Senate DID vote on tax cuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 02:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Please point to the vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:16 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I think that Republicans had the ability to force the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Maybe that's what the WH wanted. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Yes, the WH wanted the Senate to stop the President from making recess appointments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:29 AM Original message |
There will always be people on DU who will blame Obama when all evidence says otherwise. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:38 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. It makes as much sense as Senate Democrats doing it on their own initiative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ampad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Any Senate Dem that would make such a bargin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:58 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Given their behavior the past two years, should we credit the Senate Dems for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
38. Good god. The Senate does something but it's Obama's fault they did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #10 |
24. No... The WH wanted Senate Democrats to get back home to campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Not much point in making recess appointments this close to the end of a Congress, anyway. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:47 AM Response to Reply #24 |
33. Why didn't the WH just promise to not make any recess appointments until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:53 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Seems like that would be the case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:55 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. The Republicans have to say in the matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:10 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Sorry... that's simply not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #33 |
48. That's a really good question. Maybe because Turtle Face McConnell wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Oh wait..someone did manage to blame Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:55 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Yes, didn't take long. This place is disgusting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. Did you read the follow-up a few posts below it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #39 |
50. Actually, I don't hate Obama at all. I find it both infantile and telling that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ampad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. The admin of this board needs take a closer look at some members |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:52 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Wow. You're the one over the edge. All I was suggesting is that this might have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
40. No, that's not all you were suggesting, as you showed in one reply above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:52 AM Response to Reply #17 |
34. If you think that someone is violating DU rules, you should alert the moderators |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 10:09 AM Response to Reply #6 |
23. That makes no logical sense. If the WH didn't want to appoint recess positions, all they have.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. This way, the Senate Dems get cussed at for a day. The other way, some folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
41. Nobody's buying your "innocent" explanation. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fruittree (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
28. Oh of course!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
30. Another DUer suffering from Obama Derangement Syndrome? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newfie11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. SHIT! I guess it makes no difference who we vote for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Agreed and it's these people Obama is fighting against. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
43. Note that this is the Senate. And it's the Senate who screwed up healthcare. But Obama gets the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
4. Deleted message |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:08 AM Response to Reply #4 |
27. Um, friend? It's "Democratic". With an "ic" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golddigger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
29. It's Democratic and Republican't! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
44. Ah, would you be here to suppress the vote by chance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
8. Senators don't want to give up their ability to approve or reject nominees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
9. I'm surprised people arent' blaming Obama. He of course can control the Senate...right?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
45. Oh, just look up thread. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
13. It appears they have taken their brains out and are playing with them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
14. You see the crap Obama has to deal with????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
16. They allowed Bush to recess appoint a Swift Liar enabler |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
22. If you read the Hill article, you will understand why they agreed to this 'deal.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thelordofhell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. I'm sure McConnell double pinky sweared to not do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 11:44 AM Response to Reply #22 |
32. It makes no difference. He will have to do that in January anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
46. That makes no sense. If the Pukes do that, so what? It makes them look like idiots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denimgirly (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
42. I read the article and i understand..But WAIT..Whats the diff. between Both Parties again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
47. *&*#@&#$@((&& !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
51. It is galling that people on DU blame the President for not moving things while the "Democrats" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zenlitened (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-30-10 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
53. Hey, it worked out great last summer, when they stayed in session to help the unemployed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC