Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are some here arguing for those that put Republicans back in power?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:30 PM
Original message
Why are some here arguing for those that put Republicans back in power?
I'm seeing stuff like 'who can blame them for voting for Republicans', 'They've lost their jobs and are pissed, so they're taking it out on the Democrats.', and 'The Democrats didn't give them anything so they voted for Republicans or stayed home'.

Is that really the argument some of you want to make? That we shouldn't blame those that voted Democratic last time for voting Republican this time because Democrats didn't fix everything in 20 months? That putting the same people that caused the job losses are the ones that should be put back in power - because the Democrats didn't get all of our jobs back yet?

Is really how some of you think? Cause that's what many of you are saying.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why argue that the Republicans ARE in power?
They've only got the House, we still have the Senate and White House. I thought two out of three wasn't bad.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. You're right. I worded that poorly.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oooh, another thread.
It's not about blame, it's about understanding. If you don't have a fucking job then some fool telling you to be patient isn't going to help. Spend a year or more unemployed and see how patient you are.

I know there wasn't time to fix the situation. I know Obama has created jobs in the face of overwhelming odds. I voted for the man and I'll vote for him again. that doesn't mean I'm not capable of analyzing why some shit went down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Patience has nothing to do with what I'm saying.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 04:00 PM by Dawgs
I'm saying that voting for those that caused the loss of jobs over the one party that is doing everything to get them back is stupid. I don't know why I keep having to repeat myself with you.

If you don't think Democrats have done enough then I can't help you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. The largest employer in my area shut down
in April 2009 and it is still down today. The recession started with Bush but Americans want instant results and have a short memory. I talked to one of the guys that worked in that plant last week, I said if the Republicans get control of the Congress you may as well forget about any more unemployment extensions. He said he doesn't want any more unemployment extensions he wants a f-----g job. He has been laid off for a 1 1/2 years and has house and car payments and no prospects for a job paying more than minimum wage. Can you blame him for being pissed off when all he has heard for the last year is arguing about health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't blame the messenger. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Huh? I'm not. I'm blaming those that are supporting those that voted Republican. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because failing to understand what may have motivated such voters is a mistake

Sorry, but whether or not you want to stick your fingers in your ears and go "LA LA LA LA" for the next two years, it is important to find answers to the questions of why candidates like Russ Feingold and Joe Sestak did not secure a majority of votes.

The reasons why such candidates did not win may not make logical sense, but there is going to be another election in two years, and if we expect to win, then we must find out how to understand and connect with whatever motivated a lot of folks to vote against their own interests.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Where did I say we didn't need to connect with these types of voters?
I completely agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Okay

But as jumpy as we are, I try to distinguish between someone attempting an explanation versus advocating a position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree - using words you'd expect to hear from an ignorant low-information reactionary
...is not productive IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. It wasn't that they 'didn't fix everything in 20 months.' It was that they passed ineffective policy
and tried to sell people on how great it all was.

If they'd not promised that ridiculously low amount of stimulus they passed would keep unemployment at/under 8%, we'd have been in better shape. Also wasn't helpful that they spent a year after that agreeing with the deficit hawks making it impossible to ask for more stimulus. Then, after continuing to hand the banksters more money with no strings, the American people heard, "We have limited resources for this," at the jobs' summit.

Call me crazy but some people might have thought they didn't appear to care much about what happened to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. What's your counter?
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 04:39 PM by jeff47
Some loss of seats was inevitable. It's a midterm, and some seats always go.

But where this administration absolutely failed was in communication. So far, they've got a shitload done. Some could be better, but there's plenty to crow about.

But they never crowed.

Trumpeting their achievements would have damaged the moronic search for bipartisanship, so they kept quiet. Well, if you don't counter GOP lies for 2 years, you're gonna lose. Poll numbers started getting much better when Obama started campaigning in late August, but that's far too late to remove the calcified conventional wisdom. And incredibly stupid ideas like "Recovery Summer", and the continued insistence that the stimulus bill was "just right", did not help.

So yes, who can blame them for voting for Republicans, when the Republicans have been the only ones talking to them for the last two years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC