Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Weekly Address: President Obama Calls for Compromise and Explains his Priorities on Taxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:13 AM
Original message
Weekly Address: President Obama Calls for Compromise and Explains his Priorities on Taxes

Weekly Address: President Obama Calls for Compromise and Explains his Priorities on Taxes

WASHINGTON – As Congress prepares to focus on taxes when it returns to work later this month, President Obama called on both parties to work together and focus on the areas where all sides agree. First, the President underscored that middle-class families need permanent tax relief, so Congress should permanently extend tax cuts for all families making less than $250,000 a year – 98 percent of the American people. And second, he noted that, with the nation’s challenging fiscal situation, the country simply cannot afford to borrow another $700 billion on permanent tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.

The full audio of the address is HERE. The video can be viewed online at www.whitehouse.gov.

Remarks of President Barack Obama
Weekly Address
The White House
November 6, 2010


This week, Americans across the country cast their votes and made their voices heard. And your message was clear.

You’re rightly frustrated with the pace of our economic recovery. So am I.

You’re fed up with partisan politics and want results. I do too.

So I congratulate all of this week’s winners – Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. But now, the campaign season is over. And it’s time to focus on our shared responsibilities to work together and deliver those results: speeding up our economic recovery, creating jobs, and strengthening the middle class so that the American Dream feels like it’s back within reach.

That’s why I’ve asked to sit down soon with leaders of both parties so that we can have an extended discussion about what we can do together to move this country forward.

And over the next few weeks, we’re going to have a chance to work together in the brief upcoming session of Congress.

Here’s why this lame duck session is so important. Early in the last decade, President Bush and Congress enacted a series of tax cuts that were designed to expire at the end of this year.

What that means is, if Congress doesn’t act by New Year’s Eve, middle-class families will see their taxes go up starting on New Year’s Day.

But the last thing we should do is raise taxes on middle-class families. For the past decade, they saw their costs rise, their incomes fall, and too many jobs go overseas. They’re the ones bearing the brunt of the recession. They’re the ones having trouble making ends meet. They are the ones who need relief right now.

So something’s got to be done. And I believe there’s room for us to compromise and get it done together.

Let’s start where we agree. All of us want certainty for middle-class Americans. None of us want them to wake up on January 1st with a higher tax bill. That’s why I believe we should permanently extend the Bush tax cuts for all families making less than $250,000 a year. That’s 98 percent of the American people.

We also agree on the need to start cutting spending and bringing down our deficit. That’s going to require everyone to make some tough choices. In fact, if Congress were to implement my proposal to freeze non-security discretionary spending for three years, it would bring this spending down to its lowest level as share of the economy in 50 years.

But at a time when we are going to ask folks across the board to make such difficult sacrifices, I don’t see how we can afford to borrow an additional $700 billion from other countries to make all the Bush tax cuts permanent, even for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. We’d be digging ourselves into an even deeper fiscal hole and passing the burden on to our children.

I recognize that both parties are going to have to work together and compromise to get something done here. But I want to make my priorities clear from the start. One: middle class families need permanent tax relief. And two: I believe we can’t afford to borrow and spend another $700 billion on permanent tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.

There are new public servants in Washington, but we still face the same challenges. And you made it clear that it’s time for results. This a great opportunity to show everyone that we got the message and that we’re willing, in this post-election season, to come together and do what’s best for the country we all love.

Thanks.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't believe that Obama is caving in
Edited on Sat Nov-06-10 10:17 AM by MannyGoldstein
I've come to believe that he's getting exactly the results he wants. Nobody that smart could be so foolish as to believe that negotiating with today's Republicans can lead to anything at all but a headache.

If he was actually interested in ending tax cuts for the wealthiest, he'd bring up, time and again, that these cuts did nothing under Bush - our economy sucked the full time Bush was in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes, of course.
Edited on Sat Nov-06-10 10:24 AM by ProSense
It's better to read what the President actually said instead of letting RW media headlines stir up outrage.


Here is Reuters (from LBN):

But while insisting tax cuts for wealthier Americans should not become permanent because of a $700 billion impact on the deficit over the next decade, he left the door open to a temporary extension for higher income levels -- as long as it falls short of costing that much.


Ignoring the editorial assumption, there is nothing in the President's statement about "as long as."

There are other options, including this: Extend the Bush Tax Cut to the Bottom 99 Percent, But Not The Top 1 Percent.

If Republican don't agree to something, the tax cuts will expire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. How about a $10 bet on whether the Repubs get everything they want?
Edited on Sat Nov-06-10 12:55 PM by MannyGoldstein
We can base it on the cost to the tax payer - I'll bet $10 that the working Americans end up taking a hit for at least 90% of the $700 billion in question now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's what I want to see.....For him to be open but draw lines in the sand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Obama says one thing then immediately begins compromising it away,
I have no faith in him at all at this point. I disagreed strongly when folks said he shouldn't be the candidate because he was too young and too inexperienced, but to date, they have been correct, and he's been all talk about change and working for middle class families, but his lack of leadership and inability to negotiate have given away nearly all hope that anyone without $1M or more to their name matters at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Too young and inexperienced.
I haven't heard freeper talking points like that in quite some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Interesting, I remember them as Hillary talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. But that
doesn't actually mean anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Of course it doesn't mean anything to you. Fortunately, some of us
still allow reality into our spheres of opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacksonian Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I think it means this
Obama's an extremely capable man, but where he fails is in that feel for what is possible and stretchable at any moment.

An example: one of the reasons the HC thing got away from him a little is because he didn't make health the centerpiece of his campaign in 2008. Granted that would have politically risky, and he did not ignore the issue and did promise movement, but I think if you go back and watch his campaigning, you don't really get the feel that a year long fight for benefits was going to be the (nearly) whole focus of the first year.

And since that all was foreseeable, a little more setting us up for what was to come would have helped hugely. Instead of having the debate with a billion dollar ad campaign at his back and tested at polls, he relied on Faux to get his message out. It cost him capital, and came from not knowing truly what he was up against. Now he knows, experience is always the answer then the question.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. What?
"one of the reasons the HC thing got away from him a little is because he didn't make health the centerpiece of his campaign in 2008."

He campaigned on health care reform.

Health care reform passed, and Americans are fully aware that it passed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. And a word from Citizen Kane...
Edited on Sat Nov-06-10 10:31 AM by denimgirly

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. Here's an example of counter-MSM messaging

Obama: Extend middle-class tax cuts, forget borrowing for the rich

by Susan Gardner

...at a time when we are going to ask folks across the board to make such difficult sacrifices, I don’t see how we can afford to borrow an additional $700 billion from other countries to make all the Bush tax cuts permanent, even for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. We’d be digging ourselves into an even deeper fiscal hole and passing the burden on to our children.

I recognize that both parties are going to have to work together and compromise to get something done here. But I want to make my priorities clear from the start. One: middle class families need permanent tax relief. And two: I believe we can’t afford to borrow and spend another $700 billion on permanent tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.

<video>

Perfect framing.

President Obama knocked it out of the ballpark this morning in his first weekly address after a discouraging election for Democrats, advocating tax cuts for the middle class and pointing out that we'd have to borrow to extend the same tax cuts to the rich.

Bravo.

The entire address is short, sweet and to the point: He heard the message of frustration with inaction from voters, he intends to heed it, and the burden for holding up the process will clearly be passed to Republicans who will be pushing for more borrowing to reward their rich friends. It doesn't get any better than this.

His closing is a perfect grace note, acknowledging the election's results while warning that there are the same old problems awaiting solution:

There are new public servants in Washington, but we still face the same challenges. And you made it clear that it’s time for results. This a great opportunity to show everyone that we got the message and that we’re willing, in this post-election season, to come together and do what’s best for the country we all love.

Ball's in your court, Republicans. Do you cooperate and start problem solving? Or do you hold the country's problems hostage to serving millionaires and billionaires?

more

Of course, pre-emptive outrage is more fun.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC