The sad tale of the Democrats who hated the unemployed

And Heath Shuler thinks he should be Minority Leader?

:rofl:

I never thought of that. Aren't they, in effect, fired?

:hi:

cushy pensions and their nice, fat, cadillac, no-hassles-little-expense health plans for life, very much unlike the rest of us, you know, the ones WHO PAY FOR IT FOR THEM.

The only problem is that, for the most part, the ones who replaced them are going to be far worse when it comes to these things, especially the needs of the unemployed and desperate. Like the hateful vindictive completely clueless Palin-clone dipshit who replaced my own congress critter, Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin. She is going to be an absolute nightmare, much, much worse than Sandlin. She's also a hypocrite extraordinaire. She screams and rants about cutting spending and the deficit, but she and her family farm enjoy nice, fat federal farm subsidies that have added up to millions of dollars. She's made it clear she has no intention of giving those up or allowing them to be changed. She also won't refuse the nice, cushy benefits congress critters receive even though she's against health care reform and doesn't care about those of us in this state who can't afford insurance or care. IOW, I've got mine, fuck you. Oh, my subsidies and benefits are paid for by you? Thank you very much and FUCK YOU.

The only consolation is that she barely squeaked by, she by no means has a mandate at all. She barely made it by two percent, which means that at least 52 percent of people had some sense and saw the repuke for who she really is.

"The only problem is that, for the most part, the ones who replaced them are going to be far worse when it comes to these things, especially the needs of the unemployed and desperate."

I would rather see Heath Shuler than a Republican in his seat if it helps Dems to keep the majority.

These Democrats helped to block benefits for two months. Republicans have a clear majority in the House, it will be on them to extend benefits. Let's see if they have the guts to deny unemployement benefits for their constituents.

they will do it proudly then run back to their bankster masters and boast about it, while sitting around making even more outlandish statements about how "lazy" and "undeserving" the unemployed are, while sitting around collecting salary and benefits paid for by the very people they're screwing and putting down.

will it position them to keep their 2010 election gains in 2012?

:rofl: