Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LIBERALS aren't going to shut up and take it this time!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:09 PM
Original message
LIBERALS aren't going to shut up and take it this time!
First of all, KUDOS to Speaker Pelosi for boldly standing her ground, both in terms of continued leadership and in clearly saying NO to Republican bullies regarding tax cuts for the wealthy.


And second, today's Washington Post had two pieces about liberals and where we are right now - so good to know that liberal groups aren't about to shut up or go away!


Excerpt from: "Liberals will urge Obama not to cave to Republicans" by Perry Bacon Jr.

"Democrats are not going to be a rubber stamp for deals cuts with the Republicans in the House or the Senate," said Rep. Raul M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.), a co-chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. "Part of the battering we got was about not being able to show our base we had done enough."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/11/AR2010111107601.html


And from: "The Party of Woe" by Eugene Robinson

"What I'm hearing is frustration, and it's getting louder. I'm hearing the view that the Obama administration, which has done much good, can do better - by speaking clearly, standing its ground - and, when pushed by bullies, shoving back."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/11/AR2010111107404.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1.  Rep. Raul M. Grijalva is a great man
I love Nancy now, at one time annoyed because on not impeaching shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bernie Sanders is on the Thom Hartmann show right now...
...saying they cannot cave - also a great man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. about time....the circular firing squad is not fun
push back against enemies, not friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You'd think all Dems would want this, but the unrecs are fast and furious - lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Seriously, that confuses the hell out of me. Great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
56. We have been invaded by moles here. I am noticing this a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. We might want to think about having to have a certain post count before members
can rec/unrec. We do it for PM's & OP's, why not rec and unrec? It might alleviate a little bit of the problem.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
66. Has all the signs of a well coordinated
infestation, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. The next front is the ability to organize, get info, the media channels. We need some way
to weed them out here. Something serious has to be done. Cannot rid DU of all of them but there a lot of them since the recent election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
61. Don't discount the possibility of tea trolls. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. the only group that needs to stand strong is congress
If we get extended Bush cuts, it will be Pelosi's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Congress needs to stop tax cuts for the rich. Obama will look stupid if he gives the GOP a free ride
Edited on Fri Nov-12-10 06:20 PM by Rosa Luxemburg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. It all rests on Pelosi
Whos performance has been less than stellar thus far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. maybe Bernie should be the opposition leader of the house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoKnLoD Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 10:54 AM
Original message
damn dupes
Edited on Sat Nov-13-10 10:55 AM by LoKnLoD
damn dupes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoKnLoD Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
47. bernie sanders is a senator not in the house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #47
69. oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Really? Which leader managed a version of the HCR bill with a PO?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. stupak ammendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
39. Pelosi fought HARD.
Edited on Sat Nov-13-10 12:16 AM by Mimosa
And 'Blue Dogs' ripped at her legs to tear her down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #39
45. i agree but getting them under control was her job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. Ahhh - he's got the scapegoat all lined up.
Sorry, it won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. why didn't you include the quote from Obama where he repeats his opposition
to extending tax cuts for Rich Bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Still mad about primary
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. it's amazing how long some will hold a grudge. amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Agreed. Kudos to Pelosi, but not the President for repeating his stance? Ohhh-kay...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsPithy Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
63. Permanently!
Obama said he is against PERMANENTLY extending the tax cuts for the rich. Huge difference! From Obama's permanent position of bending over in front of Republicans he will push for a two year extension of the tax cuts for the rich, which will magically (right before the 2012 election) turn into permanent tax cuts for the rich. Then like Claude Rains, Obama will be SHOCKED!

My God! For the sake of all that is holy! Force the Republicans to face their hypocrisy for demanding huge tax cuts for the rich (which haven't created jobs) which add billions to the deficit, and their craven demands to decrease the deficit! Cut Social Security to pay for tax cuts for the fucking rich?? Geeeeze! Put Chance the Gardener on the podium behind the presidential seal and even he could make the case which should be a no brainer for a Democratic president!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the end result of that will be?
Edited on Fri Nov-12-10 03:35 PM by stray cat
the tea partiers say the same thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Two refocused parties? Four parties? Only time will tell. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. the LIBERALS stayed at home on Nov 2nd
no bigger voice than voting and they pissed it away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Dems & indies stayed home - where is your link showing more liberals stayed home...
...than centrists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. The TV does not provide links, sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #25
38. Nice try. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Uncola Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
43. If you are using "TV" for your ..
.. source, it's no wonder why you buy silly propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #43
58. I don't think he is really buying as much as he seems to be selling...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
73. stop watching fox ffs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. Not here they didn't.
Dem Governor. Dem Senator. Destroyed three conservative amendments by more than 70%.

We didn't stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
57. Actually no, liberals voted in similar percentages as previous elections
Edited on Sat Nov-13-10 12:47 PM by liberation
and did so overwhelmingly for the Democrats.

It was your peeps, you know those high and mighty "centrists" and "moderates," who did show the biggest percentile swing towards the GOP.


But of course, that will not stop you "moderates" from blaming "liberals" for your own gross mistakes and behavior. Which is funny, because throwing rocks around is not really that advisable for those of you living in those massive glass temples of projection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepCAblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
60. That's B.S. Every liberal I know voted. That's why CA & progressives won so big...
...and why the Blue Dog candidates lost so gloriously.

Eat that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stormpilot Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #60
76. As I did
and those in my circle here in Cali as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #60
81. I don't believe we have any Blue Dogs left in AZ.
The Dems really took a beating here in AZ. The few Dems we managed to hang onto here are liberals like Grijalva, Gifford. I don't think any other state was hit as hard as ours. Very depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
82. The Dems lost independent voters 59-41. That's how we lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. The fire has to be aimed at "ourselves."
The cancer is within nominally Democratic ranks. It is exemplified by the failure to aggressively protect Social Security and Medicare, failure to politically make the case for a public option, and, crucially, a failure to restore Glass-Steagall and clean the financial house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. LIBERALS aren't going to shut up and take it .....? Never happened in the first place.
Since Obama has been President, there is not one time that anyone has shut up
about any of it....right, wrong, whispered, rumored, whatever......
the yelling has been going on for a long, long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Ms. Pelosi was talking about the soon-to-be majority party.
If the G.O.P. could pick our party's leaders, they would not pick Nancy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
80. I couldn't get by the false premise either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. Indeed, kudos are in order.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/11/pelosi-gives-bush-tax-cut-compromise-the-big-n-o.php
Speaker Nancy Pelosi will not give ground on her opposition to extending the Bush tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans, even as the White House and other Democrats have signaled that it might be time to compromise.

"It's too costly. It's $700 billion," Pelosi told NPR this morning. "One year would be around $70 billion. That's a lot of money to give a tax cut at the high end. And I remind you that those tax cuts have been in effect for a very long time, they did not create jobs."



I think I'll send her a thank-you. We need to let her know we've got her back on this one, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. damn right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
55. Tax cuts "did not create jobs" is the message that needs to be...
drilled into Americans' heads. It's very simple. Has Obama said the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. liberals haven't shut up and taken anything, and a huge majority of us support the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. yeah, keep telling yourself that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I like to hear your definition of "liberal." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. This is the great .............
thing about self applied labels, you can apply them to yourself even when you don't know what they mean.

Liberals don't support tax cuts for the rich, no matter how temporary.

Liberals don't settle for HCR without addressing the core problem of cost.

Liberals don't accept financial regulations that fail to close loopholes that caused our economic meltdown.

People who accept centrist legislation might call themselves liberals, but we others know where they really fall on the spectrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Classical liberals would
You know, the 19th century form of it. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Welcome to the new millennium. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. Exilednight, do you see what I see?
Many of the 'sensible centrists' posting at D.U. would actually have been very comfortable as John Lindsay and Nelson Rockefeller 'liberal Republicans.' There is no place for truly secular liberal Republicans in today's rightwing nearly fascist Republican Party. So they have no 'home'.

They have entered the right fringe of the Democratic Party. They are still laissez faire globalist semi-conservatives. They are not comfortable with the FDR/Truman Democratic policies.

And they are fighting to make FDR Democrats appear to be the 'Commies' and marginilise us.

I wish they'd GO BACK to their home party and reform it. Because they are dragging Democrats into a sinkhole which alienates the working class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. I love that analysis. I do agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Uncola Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Spot on.
Let them go deal with the Teabaggers that they have much more in common with than they do REAL Democrats, ie: Liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. are you calling me a republican?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #49
67. No one called you a Republican. We just wonder what your definition of liberal is. There are .....
plenty of Dems who are neither liberal nor progressive. You sound more like a neo-liberal, which isn't the same thing as a liberal or progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. personally, i am to the left of the administration. i am not happy with everything that's going on
however, i realized a long time ago this country is not going to elect politicians very far to the left. therefore i am not going to go into a rage because the democratic party is center-left.

i think a lot of the rage here is hyperbolic, and many people are projecting their worst feelings about the political situation directly onto the president, while giving the make-up of both the electorate and congress a pass.

a quick example would be the health care bill and single payer. while that was MY personal preference, according to bernie sanders it had around 5 votes in the senate. so while i support the fact we made some progress with what was passed, i don't think it was that good of a bill. but i'm not going to declare obama the second coming of reagan, and quit the Dems over it.

i also think people are going off half cocked over the tax and deficit commission issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #70
77. Let's take a look at the health care bill.
First, I would love single payer, but liberals and progressives knew that it wasn't a reality. What was a possibility was a public option. How much of a possibility? Good enough that 77% of the public backed such an idea. I am also against mandates. But I am for imported generic drugs from countries like Canada.

Who ran on that platform? Obama did.

Now, as leader of the Democratic party, it is Obama's job to sell the message. But this bill was a foreshadowing of how Obama would handle his legislative agenda.

Not only did Obama fail to sell the message, he allowed the Republicans to frame the message and dominate the conversation. He kept waiting for Congress to get it done, that is until he figured out that Congress wasn't going to get it done. By the time Obama finally opened his mouth his 77% support had evaporated to less than 40%. Obama had also lost all control of the message.

Let us also not forget all the backroom deals with corporations that were made for the HCR bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #40
50. +10 Excellent Insight!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. + 1 MILLION!! well said and stated! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
72. John Lindsay was much more liberal than Rockefeller & much more liberal than
most of today's Dems. Among other things, he was a champion of the bill of rights and, in fact, had the first victory in Congress against the House Un-American Activities Committee. Much like what we're seeing now, committee chair Francis Walter tried to weasel his Industrial Securities Bill through the House. Under it, certain government workers could be accused & fired with no recourse -- no appeals, no right to confront their accusers, etc.

As Nat Hentoff wrote:

Walter tried to get the bill passed by putting it on the "consent calendar," by which the House would adopt it automatically if no member objected. Lindsay was the only congressman to object. Later, Walter brought the bill up again under suspension of the rules, which required only that two-thirds of the members actually present on the floor at the time vote yes. But by then, Lindsay had rounded up allies.

The Industrial Security Bill passed the House 247-132—six votes short of a two-thirds majority. It was the first time, John Lindsay told me with satisfaction, that the Un-American Activities Committee had ever been defeated in a floor fight.


Shit, we could use more with that kind of chutzpa now!

He was at the forefront of civil rights, he was against the Vietnam war when it was unfashionable to be against it. As his incredibly inaccurate NY Times obituary (he wasn't broke at his death, among other things....this NY Times piece REALLY pissed his family off because it was so untrue!) noted, "Unlike politicians who criticized antiwar protests and civil rights marches, he joined them." That much is true, as is the paragraph below:

In Congress over the ensuing seven years, Mr. Lindsay affirmed his independent-liberal credentials again and again, often voting with the Democrats on civil rights, immigration, housing, school construction, foreign aid and other issues. In 1960, he introduced a bill to set up a federal Department of Urban Affairs; in 1962, he proposed legislation embodying Gov. Nelson A. Rockefeller's plan for a federal program of medical care for the aged. He also was re-elected three times, by successively larger margins.


I remember when the kids were killed at Kent State. Lindsay suffered the wrath of the right when he lowered the flags over city hall to half-staff.

He and Rockefeller were constantly butting heads -- it's inaccurate to put them in the same "liberal" class.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
71. People who accept centrist legislation might call themselves liberals, but we others know where they
Yeah, just 'cause the cat has her kittens in the oven doesn't mean we call them biscuits! They're still kittens.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. LMFAO!!
sad. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. obama's "much good" = bones and crumbs.
no red meat, not even rice and beans, or a good salad, for that matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
37. What I'm hearing is frustration too, Gene.
Both on the micro and macro levels.

NNNGU!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
46. No, we are not.
I have had it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. Second that
I just lost my job and am over all this bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
48. HUGE K & R !!!
:patriot:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsharp88 Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
52. I'm not so sure. Obama has been saying he won't support a PERMANENT tax cut for the wealthy.
I hate it, but it sounds like he's setting us up for a temporary extension of tax cuts for the wealthy. How long? Two years until the 2012 election? Another ten years? I don't know, but I'm afraid it's coming.

I really, really hope I'm wrong about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
53. Hopefully Pelosi will continue to stand this ground
and not play the progressives. I am sick of the bait and switch. Pelosi comes back to the progressives and says something like, 'We just don't have the votes for progressive legislation, we have to hold our noses and vote for a severely compromised piece of crap bill or we won't get anything at all.' I am sick to death of this tactic, and will only believe her when I see the proof in her actions. Remember Health Insurance Deform? We have got to hold her feet to the fire and deliver real consequences to sellouts.

Liberals haven't shut up, they've just been marginalized and it's time to do something about it.

Click here to go back to the main forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
59. +10000000000!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
64. The POTUS better open his ears to the party not to his advisors..
there is frustration mounting from within. When I see Dems trying to tear down Pelosi it makes me even more suspicious as to who's side they really are on. Mr President the balls in your court, use it or lose it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colsohlibgal Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
65. Yes! Enough Is Enough!
Obama apologists drive me nuts. I'm not saying he hasn't done some good things around the edges but all in all he's been Mr. Triangulator, out Clintoning Clinton. This is a man who right out the gate shot straight right across the political spectrum with his high profile appointments. That's continued without a doubt, look at some of the wingnuts on the recent Debt Commission.

So...good on Pelosi, Grijalva, Sanders and others who are standing strong, power to the people. It would be great if Obama joined in but I'd faint if he did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moostache Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
68. I want to see THREE tax proposals.
1) Lapse ALL Bush era tax cuts.

2) Lapse ALL under $250K (remembering that they already got the same tax cuts UNDER this point as everyone else...)

3) Lapse ALL under $1M (remembering that they already got the same tax cuts UNDER this point as everyone else...)

Let the thugs defend tax cuts for the millionaires. Let them cry about "job killing agendas" and let them try to present the plan to hack away at Social Security and Medicare while leaving tax cuts for the rich and unfettered defense spending sacrosanct.

Make them vote on it too, if they threaten a filibuster, BREAK THE FILIBUSTER! Make them stand on the floor of the Senate and read the Bible or the phone book or the list of millionaires that are demanding additional tax cuts above and beyond what everyone else gets. Then hit record and start running it in a non-stop loop, every night as a campaign ad with the sub-title "Mr. Boehner, where are the jobs?"

Seeing as none of this is going to happen, its pretty goddamn clear who is REALLY in power and its not "Obama the uber-liberal" as the noise machine at that channel that shall not be named would have you believe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
75. Just like Pelosi stuck to her ground before?
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/8/20/17111/5223

Pelosi: “There’s no way I can pass a bill in the House of Representatives without a public option”

I now prepare myself for the inevitable..."we tried but we just don't have the votes" or momentum/loud enough voices/stamina/ability to communicate our position properly to at least embarass the Repukes into defending their "just say no" mantra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
78. When have liberals ever shut up? They've been complaining for two years.
Edited on Sat Nov-13-10 07:02 PM by Phx_Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angee_is_mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
79. and yet progressives want hoyer 2nd in command
Wonder want he is going to do? Wonder what the bluedogs are going to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC