Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So when the very rich don't get a tax break 'it is called raising taxes'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 02:18 PM
Original message
So when the very rich don't get a tax break 'it is called raising taxes'
Edited on Sat Nov-13-10 02:19 PM by Rosa Luxemburg
Do the Republicans agree with giving the very rich a tax break? Yes they do.

The majority of the public does not agree with giving the rich a tax break or bonuses.

This was not made clear during the November elections.

It is about time Democrats got the message out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats need to get the message themselves....
..before they can get it out to the people. But they're so insulated in their beltway, 24 hour cable news chattering head lifestyle, all of which is occupied by wealthy people that they just don't understand that themselves. Or I should say not enough of them do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Perhaps someone should have a quiet word with them
and tell them to get their act together?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. THEY ARE GETTING A tax break, just not an out of proportion one!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wish we could flash your chart on TV every morning and evening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I have been using it in FaceBook. Notice the difference between the proposed tax cuts
in what would be the largest constituency amongst those experiencing the most increase, i.e. $200-$500K. Apparently Republicans are perfectly willing to enslave all future generations to, for example, our War spending excesses, for something over $400. a year in their taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. the Republicans should be exposed
pity we couldn't pay for a few ads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That's true.
But I bet my wife's 3% raise increase a couple of years ago was bigger than my neighbor's 3% raise--and a lot less than my mother's lawyer's 3% raise. Was this difference fair? Why not have all raises be in equal dollar amounts?

Well, I bet if your income's $200,000 an inflation rate of 2% costs you a lot more than it costs my family with its $60k/year income and a whole lot more than my neighbor's with their $35k/year income.

Similarly, if you look at the amount of taxes paid you'd see that the amounts for brackets look more like the right-hand "column" than the left. By that token, you already pay little but you get a big tax cut (in %), but if you already pay a lot then the tax reduction is very small and the effect is that in percentage terms you pay even more.

We use % or absolute values discrimately to buttress what we want to convince others of. What "good" is "common" is easily reduced--often cynically--to a function of the means used to display the data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Your post reads like an argument for a flat tax rate.
Which I think would be fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama should run on this in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The GOP will insist that the very rich will have big cuts in taxes, so yes
Obama can say a lot about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And upwards of 60% of Americans want to see taxes on those who make over $250,000. So it is
Something Obama could run on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. yes, he could up it to $300,000 for a married couple and then bingo
the rich guys above $300,000 could be taxed a lot. Especially those over $500,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Don't forget "Class Warfare" It's only class warfare though
if something affects exorbitant profits of the wealthy. Their raping of the middle class, of course, is something different--more natural.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC