Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You want to see some caving? McConnell already caving to the President & the Teabaggers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:48 PM
Original message
You want to see some caving? McConnell already caving to the President & the Teabaggers

McConnell: Earmark ban won’t save any money
By Alexander Bolton - 11/07/10 12:19 PM ET
Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) said he and his Republican colleagues will discuss an earmark ban when Congress returns to Washington but gave scant support to the proposal.

McConnell, who has voted in the past for a Senate-wide earmark moratorium, is skeptical about banning earmarks just within the Senate GOP conference.

“The problem is it doesn’t save any money,” McConnell said during a Sunday interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

McConnell takes a different view of the issue than House Republican Leader John Boehner (Ohio) and some Tea Party-backed candidates who won election to Congress.

He said the debate would come up within the conference the week after next.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), an outspoken proponent of an earmarks ban, is confident he has the votes to implement it within his conference, according to aides.

McConnell, a longtime member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, noted that President Obama supports an earmark moratorium in Congress because it will give the administration more control over spending decisions.



Obama urges earmark elimination in weekly address

I agree with those Republican and Democratic members of Congress who’ve recently said that in these challenging days, we can’t afford what are called earmarks. These are items inserted into spending bills by members of Congress without adequate review.

Now, some of these earmarks support worthy projects in our local communities. But many others do not. We can’t afford Bridges to Nowhere like the one that was planned a few years back in Alaska. Earmarks like these represent a relatively small part of overall federal spending. But when it comes to signaling our commitment to fiscal responsibility, addressing them would have an important impact.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/11/13/920197/-Obama-urges-earmark-elimination-in-weekly-address



Senate GOP Leader McConnell endorses earmark ban
11/15/10

WASHINGTON — The top Republican in the Senate has reversed course and endorsed a moratorium on pork-barrel projects known as "earmarks." Those are special funding requests lawmakers slip into legislation for home-state projects.

Kentucky Republican Mitch McConnell says he's heeding the message voters sent in elections that swept Democrats from power in the House. He says he can't accuse Democrats of failing to ignore the wishes of the American people and then be guilty of the same thing.

McConnell's move gives tea party activists a win and heads off a battle with conservatives in his own party in the Senate. House GOP leaders had already endorsed a ban on the practice.

McConnell, a member of the Appropriations Committee, is a longtime defender of earmarking.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40199100/ns/politics/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fascinating that he can be caving to both at the same time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I know! It's about to do my head in....
.... half a day into the lame duck session and the parties have actually AGREED on something!!!!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. McConnell's statement....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Guess he does not want to see the underside of that bus, after all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting. I didn't think there were that many TB's in the Senate?
I know there's quqite a few in theHosue and Boner is going to have his hands full with them, but the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The two BIG ones....
... DeMint and Paul .... and probably Rubio. (obviously the last two aren't officially there yet, but they might as well be.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Again with the frickin "Bridge to Nowhere".
it isn't to "nowhere", it's to the frickin AIRPORT. people in Ketchikan have to take a ferry to get there now.

here's a GOOD EARMARK: a radar station for the NW coast of Washington. currently, the 3.5 million people in Puget Sound have no way to see storms approaching off the coast.

http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2010/10/meteorological-earmarks-and-us-senate.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC