Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will a primary challenge to President Obama in 2012 make it more likely a republican will win

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:21 AM
Original message
Poll question: Will a primary challenge to President Obama in 2012 make it more likely a republican will win
the presidency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. History tells us that when a sitting President faces a serious primary oponent...
Edited on Sat Nov-27-10 01:25 AM by Ozymanithrax
that President and that party looses the White House. This is true back to Johnson.

Of course, there is likely to be someone with the ego to say they will defy history, and a lot of people who will vote for that person.

But a stiff primary challenge against Obama is a Republican wet dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. OK, let's look at the record...
Edited on Sun Nov-28-10 12:15 AM by Joe Bacon
In 1932, France challenged Hoover. France won the popular vote in all the GOP primaries yet lost the nomination to Hoover. Hoover lost.

In 1936, Upton Sinclair challenged FDR and got wiped out. FDR won.

In 1952, Kefauver challenged Truman and defeated him in New Hampshire. Truman withdrew.

In 1964, George Wallace challenged Lyndon Johnson in Wisconsin, Maryland and Indiana, getting around 30-35% of the vote in each state against stand-ins for Johnson. Johnson won.

In 1968, Johnson beat McCarthy in the New Hampshire popular vote, but lost the delegates. Johnson withdrew before losing to Mc Carthy in Wisconsin.

In 1972, Nixon was challenged by Mc Closkey and Ashbrook. Mc Closkey actually got one delegate. Nixon won.

In 1976, Reagan challenged Ford. Ford lost

In 1980, Kennedy challenged Carter. Carter lost

In 1992, Buchanan challenged Bush. Bush lost

Who could challenge Obama in 2012. Some talk about Feingold, but that would make as much sense as France's challenge to Hoover in 1932...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Obama won't have a serious challenger from the left.
He might have a gadfly left challenger, but not anyone who can organize a serious campaign. Obama made progress on too many issues and most of the failures were the fault of the Senate. Major donors and organized left wing groups won't be foolish enough to back a losing challenger.

However, it's possible that a candidate to the right could raise the money to run a serious challenge. Evan Bayh? Nelson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. I wouldn't be surprised if Bayh challenges Obama
And our Corporate-Controlled Conservative Press will pass the "Bayh is a centrist" bullshit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Those who don't remember the past are doomed to repeat the bad parts of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Indeed, 'bipartisanship' with the GOP is a good example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. a primary challenge will suck money away from what will be needed for the general election
and thus it can only hurt our chances in the general, not help them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am more worried Bloomberg will run
and take the middle and some dems and if that happens the repubs could win no matter who is up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
37. Bloomberg has said that he will NOT consider a run. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why no choice for 'Virtually guarantee...?' n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. No difference. It is because a president is weak he gets primaried, not the other way around.\nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yup (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Right
If his approval within his own party is not solid, he's vulnerable. It's on Obama to shore up his base - or face a primary challenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Yes!
If Obama wasn't such a weak kneed appeaser who shits all over his base, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. +1
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. I will not vote for another candidate and you can pretty much forget from the black vote
To primary an outstanding president because he is not radical enough? Have fun with president Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Palin will not be the nominee
I will bet my paycheck on it.
Karl Rove, the bush family, Mitt Romney, Pawlenty, Newt, are all against her.
It will be Newt or Romney.
GOP always nominates the next in line by seniority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I actually do believe that the GOP will buck that trend this time around
...and yet, Palin will still lose. I think Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) will get the GOP nomination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. The teabaggers control the republican party now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzShellG Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. Im with you....
And thats how a lot of people I know feel. Dems never stick together and thats why we always loose. Divide and conquer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
35. And that (the black vote) is one of many reasons there will not be a primary challenge
Edited on Sun Nov-28-10 10:54 PM by stevenleser
African Americans are one of the top 5 groups in the Democratic base. You are not going to have a challenge to the first ever African American President by anyone who ever wants to win another Democratic primary ever in their lifetime. You would also guarantee that African Americans would stay home on election day should the challenge to Obama be successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. I would say they are the top group, at least proportionally speaking.
In fact, I can't think of another group where 90% votes with one party (a great thing for us, BTW).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. There should be an "Other" option. Why? Because in my view it's way too
Edited on Sat Nov-27-10 11:09 AM by Liberal_Stalwart71
early to speculate.

Besides can we afford this president at least two years in office before we starting contemplating his demise? Jeez!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Absolutely it will, and one only needs to look at 1980 for proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Anytime a sitting president is challenged from inside the party it makes it easier for the other
side. It creates a riff in the party that can't be healed by election day. Carter couldn't get enough liberal support to beat reagan in 1980. The first bush couldn't beat Clinton because he'd lost the conservatives. If somebody challenges from the left it'll keep Obama from having what liberal support he has. The only thing worse than a primary challenge to a president's re-election chances is a 3rd party candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. No difference, those who decide US elections don't even know what a
"primary challenge to President Obama" is. They probably can't even name the three branches of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. That would depend on who the General Election candidates turn out to be.
A real or fake primary, as such, means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. I voted "No difference" because...
...no matter what the Democrats do between now and
november 2012, their goose is quite thoroughly cooked.

It would take a miracle for the Democrats to hold the
Presidency and opposing Obama in a primary will make
no difference whatsoever; the Republican candidate will
win.

(Two caveats: If Obama chooses not to run, the Democrats
would be slightly closer to the required miracle. Similarly
if they replaced Obama in a contested primary, but he won't
be replaced even if there is a contested primary.)

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. It won't make it more likely, it will make it definite. n/t
Edited on Sat Nov-27-10 10:12 PM by Phx_Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-27-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. It really depends on the quality of the challenger.
Let's just say Dennis Kucinich is no Ted Kennedy.

If it is a big name it could be harmful, but if it is just some vanity campaign it will not make a difference at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
25. Our loss would be certain...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
26. Shame the question even needs to be asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GentryDixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. Herding Cats.
This is why we can get nowhere with our agenda. I cannot believe some seriously want to primary our sitting President.

This man has been in office less than 2 years. He ran and was elected on a bi-partisan agenda. Some are ready to throw him under the bus because he hasn't accomplished all they thought he would or should. He has not had a cakewalk with the party of NO. Give him time. Unless you want to see a Republican sitting in his chair in 2012.

Flame on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. I don't think it will make any difference
because I don't think there will be a "serious" challenger. They'll be some other candidates on the ballot, but none will be serious enough to prevent Obama from winning the nomination and from it affecting Obama's general election chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. From a purely financial standpoint, it does
If there's a primary challenge you have to open the warchest to defeat primary opponents. If you can save it all for the GOP you are in better shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
39. If it should happen, I doubt it would make much difference-there won't be a real liberal
challenge, and anyone more conservative would be a republican. If the media stays bought by the GOP, I believe they will win in '12 anyway-provided they are not too idiotic in Congress...

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
40. Reality People
A primary challenge will help Republicans win.And If Obama loses kiss the senate goodbye.

Q did a poll with Palin ahead among Republicans but losing against Obama.Mark my words here.
Republicans go for frontrunners.Palin may very well win the nomination Inless Huchabee and Gingrich
split the teabagger vote allowing Romney to win.Obama will face Palin or Romney In 2012.You think
they will be better than Obama.A primary challenge raises the danger of President Palin or
President romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC