Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ezra Klein: How the White House Will Sell Angry House Dems on Tax Cut Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:41 PM
Original message
Ezra Klein: How the White House Will Sell Angry House Dems on Tax Cut Deal
How the White House will sell angry House Dems on tax cut deal
By Greg Sargent

The White House is privately circulating a new chart among Congressional Democrats -- sent over by a source -- that is designed to prove to Dems that the tax deal Obama got out of Republicans is really a victory for Democrats.

It's a pretty interesting chart -- a sign that the White House is gearing up for a full court press to sell the deal to angry House Dems who are vowing to block it:



Note in particular that the chart stresses: "What Obama and Democrats got." That's an effort to persuade Dems that they can claim a stake in the good aspects of the deal: The extension of unemployment insurance and various tax credits.

more...

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/how_the_white_house_will_sell.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. How many people are touched by both sides? I think it tells it all.
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 01:45 PM by Mass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Have posted that myself. Too bad these 4.8 million are who Republicans insist be put first.
It's who they are, it's who they represent! Failed 'trickle down' economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. That is a stark difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes, particularly if you get how much in average goes to each individual in both categories,
So, it is difficult to see this proposal as positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. The attack on Social Security is the big one hidden in these scenarios...
The "payroll tax holiday" is straight out of the playbook of the Heritage Foundation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exactly. It's taking Social Security out of it's pay as you go status. It's dangerous. Tha
is chart is misleading, and misdirecting the whole issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The very liberal Robert Reich has been a long time proponent of a payroll tax holiday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. And he's wrong too...
This is a big, big mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yep
"...One of the most underreported parts of this deal is a cut to the Social Security payroll tax. In just one year, over $120 billion of revenue will be cut from Social Security under the President's compromise plan, weakening the program and virtually guaranteeing benefit cuts in the future.

Make no mistake about it. Social Security has not added one dime to the national debt and this cut will only embolden Republican attempts to privatize the program and increase the age of retirement. Social Security is a vital safety net for all Americans and a cornerstone of our commitment to protect the middle class.."

Senator Bernie Sanders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. But now the GOP can always say that the Dems are "raising taxes" when this comes up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. That article is by Greg Sargent. It isn't by Ezra Klein. Do you still have time to correct
your thread title?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. My understanding from Rachel is that a significant portion of the dems' blue column
is extension of STUFF THAT OBAMA HAD TO PUT INTO THE 2009 STIMULUS PACKAGE TO ENTICE ENOUGH GOPrs (1 or 2?) to vote for cloture!! It was republican wish list then, now it's dem wish list?

Plus, don't forget that all the beneficiaries in the red column also are beneficiaries in the blue column. Is that factored into the charts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. What Republicans get is a surrender by Democrats to their philosophy
Which is that tax cuts are always the cure for whatever ails us, and not government spending on programs that directly provide jobs and rebuild America's infrastructure. It validates the Republican position that government takes too much of our money.

Republicans WANT to starve government. They WANT to shrink it. They want government out of their way so that international corporations have few if any checks on their power. Cut government income, discredit any positive role for government, raise the Federal debt, and then demand that government shrink further because of that debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC