Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boehner claims he'll hold debt limit hostage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:06 PM
Original message
Boehner claims he'll hold debt limit hostage

Boehner claims he'll hold debt limit hostage

by Jed Lewison

Reuters:

U.S. House Speaker John Boehner said on Thursday that any move to increase the United States' $14.3 trillion debt limit must be accompanied by spending cuts.

"The American people will not stand for such an increase unless it is accompanied by meaningful action by the President and Congress to cut spending and end the job-killing spending binge in Washington," Boehner said in a prepared statement.

Boehner is doing his best to pretend that he has a strong hand, but let's not forget, if he were to actually carry out his threat and block an increase in the debt limit, the United States would go into default on its debt. Not only would it create severe credit crisis, it would also force the shutdown of most of the Federal government. So unless Boehner's absolutely insane, he's running a complete bluff.

Even if he is bluffing, Boehner's declaration raises the stakes. House Republicans have pledged a twenty percent reduction in non-defense discretionary spending. That's never going to happen, nor will anything close to it. But Boehner continues to fuel the expectations of his base that it will.

If Boehner ultimately goes along with a hike in the debt limit without securing the spending cuts that he promised to the tea party, teahadists will be furious. On the other hand, if Boehner decides to block the debt limit increase, sending the United States into default and shutting down the federal government, the rest of the country will be even angrier.

For Boehner, the only way out of this is to level with his base and tell them that the full faith and credit of the United States is not a political football, and that the battles to enact their agenda should be fought on other fields. Given his support for TARP, that's probably what he believes. But as long as he panders to them, he's playing with fire.

Cry Boehner should pick one and go for it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. The big corporate donors would be really pissed about this
I doubt they want to see US financial collapse,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. This has probably been done and I missed it, but where is a breakdown
of what portion of the debt is from the Bush Administration/Wars and which part from the Obama Administration.

If it lays out like I think it does, then the Obama Admin. should be hammering those facts into the citizens' heads...day after day after day until they have them memorized.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadbear Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Call his bluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. +1........call them on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Agree, Call that slimeball Boehner on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. WORD. "Line in the sand" time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Or will the Dems, afraid they'd soil pants over a pub-inspired default, cave as they have almost
every time pubs take them hostage by threatening to bring ruin on the country? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That's my worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. And so it begins
Trying to please "both" sides of this issue are not going to work, and Mr. Boehner is going to tick off one side or the other, and that won't be good for the republicans! Corporate america does not want him to shutdown the government, teabaggers do, so he has to make a choice, I wonder which side he will chose? The big money side or the big "blowhards" side!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. The White House must shout out Loud that the republicans will create a disaster with that vote.
If they keep quiet, and the vote is to deny the credit limit increase, Obama will get the blame for causing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Repugs are just a bunch of scenery eating ham actors. All show and no go.
Edited on Thu Jan-06-11 05:27 PM by Monk06
The refusal to raise the debt ceiling is an empty threat.

The dollar and the Dow would go right through the floor all
the way to the basement if they try it.

Like Gingrich's Contract with America; the teabagger version,
Contract FROM America, (it's all in your choice of preposition)
and the much vaunted but defeated Balanced Budget Amendment; all
are just minor soliloquies in a second rate play by an amateur theater
company called the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's bluffing! My guess is that he's testing the Dems to see if they'll cave on
anything, but will end up voting to the increase anyway.

It's up to the Dems NOT to cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC