Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Obama to do pre-Super Bowl interview with Fox's O'Reilly"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 11:47 PM
Original message
"Obama to do pre-Super Bowl interview with Fox's O'Reilly"
Obama to do pre-Super Bowl interview with Fox's O'Reilly
By Michael O'Brien - 01/06/11 03:45 PM ET

President Obama will sit down with Fox News host Bill O'Reilly in an interview set to air on Super Bowl Sunday.

A Fox News spokeswoman confirmed reports that the president would sit down with the conservative pundit for a pre-game interview before the Super Bowl on the Fox broadcast network.

The sit-down will be a moment of outreach between Obama and the network, which his administration has clashed with during the past two years over the network's coverage of the White House.

It's also the second straight year Obama will use one of the most watched television events of the year to advance his message. He sat down last year with Katie Couric on CBS, the network that hosted the NFL championship game, which took place during the height of the healthcare battles in Congress.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/136479-obama-to-do-pre-super-bowl-interview-with-foxs-oreilly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. O'Reiley is like a steamroller in an interview
It will be a miracle if he lets the president answer a question fully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Did you see their interview in '08?
The President more than held his own. O'Reilly tried to cut him off several times and he ....... THE HAND! lol .... Obama wouldn't let him. "Now, now now, now wait a minute Bill..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let me guess
Edited on Fri Jan-07-11 12:23 AM by MannyGoldstein
Obama will say that we have to be responsible adults, and that the extremists are unhelpful.

And then he'll cut Social Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. "And then he'll cut Social Security." Yup,
that's a guess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Are you ready to bet $20 on it yet?
Easy money for you, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Will it
ever become apparent that this doesn't work?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. That *what* doesn't work?
Thanks.

Night-night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
42. I'm willing to bet 20 bucks on it, depending on terms.
1. Is lack of a COLA increase a cut?
2. Is changing eligibility ages a cut?
3. Is means testing a cut?
4. Is fraud reduction a cut?

What constitutes a "cut"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. what constitutes a cut?
1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. Yes.
4. In my entire life I've never heard any claims of fraud against SS, other than criminals who don't report someone dying so they can cash their checks. And, please think about it, eliminating such fraud would not be a cut by anybody's reckoning because it doesn't touch anybody's legitimate payments while at the same time preserving the funds for those who deserve them - so, why did you even mention it? Do you REALLY hear anyone saying "Save the fraud!"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. #3 is fraud, as well.
Why give money to the rich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. And THEN he'll start stealing kittens! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. You have got to be fucking kidding me...
I'm sorry, but this President who I was SO happy to see win it all, is seriously out of touch.
Maybe he can explain how the tides come in, and the tides go out, to Bill-O the clown.
Or maybe not.

I'm at my wits end with this President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. Why does everyone think..
They can tell him what to do on every decision..and why do they think they know sooooo much more than the President..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. He acknowledged as early as the inauguration
that he will not be president of the blue states vs. the red states but President of the United States of America, which is exactly what is expected of him.

And that means being occasionally available for interviews with icky people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Say it, sister!
The constant bashing of the president is getting really, really old. This is a man who knows that he is president of the entire country. I don't understand why so many people here can't understand that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. :)
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pointless. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Why?
Million of people will be tuned in for the Super Bowl. They're likely not to be O'Reilly fans, but they'll be tuned in pre-game.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Eh. No big deal in my book. May be an opportunity to counter some of the Fox hyperbole / lies.
And pre-Super Bowl will likely have a large # of viewers.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Maybe he's "coming out".. no, not as gay
Edited on Fri Jan-07-11 12:38 AM by slay
you know.. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Exactly what would he
be coming out as?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. its obvious to everyone... no real need to ask.
serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. I guess not so obvious, I join the previous poster. Come out as what? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. Apparently,
the post is inferring that the president is "coming out" as a Republican. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anAustralianobserver Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. I'd accept this if he also does a panel interview with disaffected critics from the left.
Edited on Fri Jan-07-11 02:55 AM by anAustralianobserver
You could have maybe Adam Green, Cornell West, Amy Goodman, Roseanne, Code Pink (or many others).

But I guess it's unpresidential to answer real hardball questions from the informed left - especially in a live, small group, unrushed high-feedback setting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. Maybe someone should tell him
he'll be sitting down with the worst person in the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
18. O'Reilly does not deserve to be dignified with a Presidential interview.
Edited on Fri Jan-07-11 02:36 AM by Mimosa
Dumb move on the administration's part. Fox's ratings have been declining, they've been losing corporate advertising because of Beck's antics, and now Obama's going to kibitz with that lying propagandist, O'Reilly?

And, btw, Karl Rove is on Fox News as a commentator nearly every time I click past the channel.

It can only help Fox, not help Obama. Dumb move. Our side was winning. Fox was losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. You're right. Obama going on w/ O'Leilly only serves to prop up
the myth they've created that they are 'fair and balanced'. What's next - a soul searching interview with Hannity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. You people are so....predictable!!!
This is the best move ever.

Obama is not appearing on Fox news exclusively, he will be appearing in front of all of America. O'Reilly won't be preaching to the choir. This will be watched and judged by the whole country. The republicans will be watching just because it's O'Reilly and expecting the usual Fox crap. What they will see is an intelligent, caring, dignified yet likable man. They won't see a crazy muslim socialist. They will hear what he really thinks and feels instead of his words run through the Fox meat grinder.

Anyone who thinks that all we have to do is fight the right to get our way is totally delusional. We do have to win them over. Obama knows that and if anyone can do it he can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. I agree. No need to legitimize a rightwing asshole like O'Reilly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. So Obama chooses to appear on the network
that refers to him as "Mr. Obama." Fox has everything to win and Obama has everything to lose.
I'm beginning to think he enjoys humiliating himself in the interest of bipartisianship. What a
tool he's become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Hannity always calls the Prez 'this or that GUY'! And he hasn't stopped.
Anybody who thinks the continuing goal of Fox News (led by Roger Ailes and now Karl Rove) isn't to bring down President Obama is 'delusional', to quote 'Rich Girl' in a reply to me. I exept Shep Smith from the line up of liars and creeps on Fox news. he's the one on air person who does seem 'fair and balanced'. Which only points out how bad the rest are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadbear Donating Member (799 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe they can go out a punch hippies together after the interview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. I remember that way back during the primaries, O'Reilly stalked
Obama at one of his appearances, and Obama promised that he'd give him an interview at a later date. This is a later date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. He's just going to talk to his new base
Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. Why would he provide a sexual pervert an interview?
He only provides these racist assholes a degree of credibility. I don't see any advantage. None what so ever. He could have been interviewed by a number of respectable journalists, not some clown that doesn't know his asshole from a hole in the ground. Do you think perhaps Obama will provide him some First Grade knowledge on tides? I suppose this is part of Obama's bipartisanship crap. When he is looking for a handout for the 2012 election he can look up O'Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
32. I don't know what..
Is THE BIG FUCKING DEAL? He has done it before,they can't make him say anything he doesn't want to he can handle it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scottybeamer70 Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
34. Too bad.....
Helen Thomas won't be interviewing him. Now, that I would watch!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. Thank God for casinos.......
Superbowl partys are so loud on that day you can't here the game at all.
P.S. Fuck Bill O the ass clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. K&R. Obama will kick O'Reilly's butt if he tries to be confrontational, and
he will win over older people and Independents while he's at it. Good decision!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. As pointed out, this year the Super Bowl will be on the Fox broadcast network.
If it were on NBC, he'd do the interview with someone from THERE. Some people get mad at ANYTHING Obama does. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
namahage Donating Member (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
38. Oh noes. He's talking with a conservative pundit.
Imagine how screwed he'd be if he went up against a whole group of Republicans on their home turf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
40. In other news... there's a football game going on.
BFD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anAustralianobserver Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
41. I think the optics of him yukking it up on a sports celebration day
on FOX News turf is wack. If it wasn't a celebration day and he occasionally goes on FOX News for a serious interview to co-opt the transmission that's fine, as he has done before.

In this situation if O'Reilly goes confrontational and serious on him he has to come back on him strong, which clashes with the all-American party vibe. On the other hand if O'Reilly goes wink-wink back-slappy with him then O'Reilly makes him look a tool like David Gregory dancing with MC Rove.

So unless Obama has something up his sleeve he might regret this one, no matter how 'customary' it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Is it customary for Presidents to do interviews before the Superbowl?
Not being a sports fan I don't remember any doing it previously.

What date is 'Superbowl Sunday' anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anAustralianobserver Donating Member (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Feb 6. Apparently he did one with Katie Couric last year but I'm not sure how they mix the politics
with the sports or how soon before the event the interview is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC